UPAYA HUKUM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE DI PENGADILAN

Pieter Radjawane

doi:10.47268/sasi.v22i2.165

UPAYA HUKUM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE DI PENGADILAN

Pieter Radjawane⁽¹⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

In today's borderless business era, arbitration is a very popular dispute settlement
institution used by businesses. However, it is not uncommon for business people, especially
those who win cases, to be frustrated when faced with the implementation of arbitration
rulings involving the courts. The process of dispute resolution at the National Arbitration
Institute, as it is commonly known in the Court, dispute resolution will lead to a decision
(National Arbitration Award). Article 70 of Law no. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative
Dispute Settlement, affirming that the arbitral award can only be canceled if it is suspected to
contain elements of fake Letter / Document, or found documents hidden by the opponent or a
judgment taken from the guile by one of the parties in Examination, but the fact in practice the
court still receives the request and cancels the arbitration decision outside the context of that
article which is the basis of the reference for the cancellation of the arbitral award.

Keywords

Cancellations; Verdict; Arbitration

DOI

10.47268/sasi.v22i2.165

Published

2016-12-13

How To Cite

APA: Radjawane, P. (2016). UPAYA HUKUM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE DI PENGADILAN. SASI, 22(2), 21-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v22i2.165.

IEEE: P. Radjawane, "UPAYA HUKUM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE DI PENGADILAN", SASI, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 21-29, Dec. 2016. Accessed on: Nov. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v22i2.165

Harvard: Radjawane, P., (2016). "UPAYA HUKUM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE DI PENGADILAN". SASI, Volume 22(2), pp. 21-29. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v22i2.165 (Accessed on: 22 November 2024)

Chicago: Radjawane, Pieter. "UPAYA HUKUM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE DI PENGADILAN." SASI 22, no. 2 (December 13, 2016): 21-29. Accessed November 22, 2024. doi:10.47268/sasi.v22i2.165

Vancouver: Radjawane P. UPAYA HUKUM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE DI PENGADILAN. SASI [Internet]. 2016 Dec 13 [cited 2024 Nov 22];22(2):21-29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v22i2.165

MLA 8th: Radjawane, Pieter. "UPAYA HUKUM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE DI PENGADILAN." SASI, vol. 22, no. 2, 13 Dec. 2016, pp. 21-29, doi:10.47268/sasi.v22i2.165. Accessed 22 Nov. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{SASI165,
		author = {Pieter Radjawane},
		title = {UPAYA HUKUM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE DI PENGADILAN},
		journal = {SASI},
		volume = {22},
		number = {2},
		year = {2016},
		keywords = {Cancellations; Verdict; Arbitration},
		abstract = {In today's borderless business era, arbitration is a very popular dispute settlementinstitution used by businesses. However, it is not uncommon for business people, especiallythose who win cases, to be frustrated when faced with the implementation of arbitrationrulings involving the courts. The process of dispute resolution at the National ArbitrationInstitute, as it is commonly known in the Court, dispute resolution will lead to a decision(National Arbitration Award). Article 70 of Law no. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and AlternativeDispute Settlement, affirming that the arbitral award can only be canceled if it is suspected tocontain elements of fake Letter / Document, or found documents hidden by the opponent or ajudgment taken from the guile by one of the parties in Examination, but the fact in practice thecourt still receives the request and cancels the arbitration decision outside the context of thatarticle which is the basis of the reference for the cancellation of the arbitral award.},
				issn = {2614-2961},		pages = {21--29}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v22i2.165},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/165}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Bambang Sutiyoso, 2008, Hukum Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Gama Media, Yogyakarta.

Frans Hendra Winarta, 2013, Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Gatot Soemartono, 2006, Arbitrase dan Mediasi Di Indonesia, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Gunawan Widjaja, 2008, Arbitrase Vs Pengadilan: Persoalan Kompetensi Absolut yang Tidak Pernah Selesai, Kencana, Jakarta.

Gunawan Widjaja dan Ahmad Yani, 2001, Seri Hukum Bisnis : Hukum Arbitrase Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Joni Emirzon, 2001, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

M. Husseyn Umar, Supriyani Kardono, 1995, Hukum dan Lembaga Arbitrase di Indonesia, Jakarta, Komponen Hukum Ekonomi, Elips Project, Jakarta.

Munir Fuady, 2006, Arbitrase Nasional: Alternatif Penyelesaian sengketa Bisnis, Citra Aditya, Bandung.

Nazarkhan Yasin, 2008, Mengenal Klaim Konstruksi & Penyelesaian Sengketa Konstruksi, PT Gramedia Pustaka

Utama, Jakarta.

Suyud Margono, 2014, ADR & Arbitrase Proses Pelembagaan dan Aspek Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor.

Full Text: PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 2786 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) icon PDF

Download : 1380 times

Cited-By:

1. Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision
Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri, Ratih Lestarini
Jurnal Konstitusi vol: 20 issue: 3 first page: 406 year: 2023
Type: Journal [View Source]

2. Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision
Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri, Ratih Lestarini
Jurnal Konstitusi vol: 20 issue: 3 first page: 406 year: 2023
Type: Journal [View Source]