KRITERIA BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA YANG DIBERIKAN HAK MONOPOLI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA

Rory Jeff Akyuwen

doi:10.47268/sasi.v22i2.166

KRITERIA BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA YANG DIBERIKAN HAK MONOPOLI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA

Rory Jeff Akyuwen⁽¹⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Analysuing the position of monopoly State-Owned Enterprises in the perspective of
business competition law which could potentially give rise to barriers in business competition
in particular concerning control over production branches are considered important and
master his life much. Though it is excluded in law number 5 of 1999 concerning the
prohibition of Monopolies and Anticompetitive Business practices are unhealthy, but that
should not be considered a monopoly owned by the State-Owned Enterprises at the same time
have the power over the market, and all the power over its own market not obliging him to
carry on the practice of healthy competition. Criteria for State-Owned Enterprises can be given a monopoly in business competition law perspective, just look at the functions and Government intervention in the economy aimed at the earliest possible time the prosperity of the people. Criteria for State-Owned Enterprises can be given a monopoly should be seen from the form and objectives of the establishment of State-Owned Enterprises as well as the magnitude of the ownership of the Government's stake in it.

Keywords

Criteria State Owned Enterprises; Monopoly

DOI

10.47268/sasi.v22i2.166

Published

2016-12-13

How To Cite

APA: Akyuwen, R.J. (2016). KRITERIA BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA YANG DIBERIKAN HAK MONOPOLI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA. SASI, 22(2), 30-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v22i2.166.

IEEE: R.J. Akyuwen, "KRITERIA BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA YANG DIBERIKAN HAK MONOPOLI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA", SASI, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 30-42, Dec. 2016. Accessed on: May. 11, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v22i2.166

Harvard: Akyuwen, R.J., (2016). "KRITERIA BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA YANG DIBERIKAN HAK MONOPOLI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA". SASI, Volume 22(2), pp. 30-42. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v22i2.166 (Accessed on: 11 May 2025)

Chicago: Akyuwen, Rory Jeff. "KRITERIA BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA YANG DIBERIKAN HAK MONOPOLI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA." SASI 22, no. 2 (December 13, 2016): 30-42. Accessed May 11, 2025. doi:10.47268/sasi.v22i2.166

Vancouver: Akyuwen RJ. KRITERIA BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA YANG DIBERIKAN HAK MONOPOLI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA. SASI [Internet]. 2016 Dec 13 [cited 2025 May 11];22(2):30-42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v22i2.166

MLA 8th: Akyuwen, Rory Jeff. "KRITERIA BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA YANG DIBERIKAN HAK MONOPOLI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA." SASI, vol. 22, no. 2, 13 Dec. 2016, pp. 30-42, doi:10.47268/sasi.v22i2.166. Accessed 11 May. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{SASI166,
		author = {Rory Akyuwen},
		title = {KRITERIA BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA YANG DIBERIKAN HAK MONOPOLI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA},
		journal = {SASI},
		volume = {22},
		number = {2},
		year = {2016},
		keywords = {Criteria State Owned Enterprises; Monopoly},
		abstract = {Analysuing the position of monopoly State-Owned Enterprises in the perspective ofbusiness competition law which could potentially give rise to barriers in business competitionin particular concerning control over production branches are considered important andmaster his life much. Though it is excluded in law number 5 of 1999 concerning theprohibition of Monopolies and Anticompetitive Business practices are unhealthy, but thatshould not be considered a monopoly owned by the State-Owned Enterprises at the same timehave the power over the market, and all the power over its own market not obliging him tocarry on the practice of healthy competition. Criteria for State-Owned Enterprises can be given a monopoly in business competition law perspective, just look at the functions and Government intervention in the economy aimed at the earliest possible time the prosperity of the people. Criteria for State-Owned Enterprises can be given a monopoly should be seen from the form and objectives of the establishment of State-Owned Enterprises as well as the magnitude of the ownership of the Government's stake in it.},
				issn = {2614-2961},		pages = {30--42}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v22i2.166},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/166}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Abrar Saleng. Hukum Pertambangan. UII Press. Jogjakarta. 2004.

Aminuddin Ilmar. Privatisasi BUMN di Indonesia. Hasanuddin University Press. Makasar. 2004.

Astim Riyanto, Teori Konstitusi, Yapemdo, Bandung. 2000.

Donald. J. Moon. The Future of Welfare State. England-The USA-Australia. 1964.

Friedman. Milton. Monopoly and The Social Responbility of Business an labour. In: Edwin Mansfield (ed). Monopoly

Power and Economic Performance An Introduction To A Current Issue of Public Policy. W. W. Norton. New York. 1994.

John Rawls, A Theorie of Justice ; Teori Keadilan, dasar-Dasar Filsafat Politik untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Sosial dalam Negara, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2006.

Johnny Ibrahim, Hukum Persaingan Usaha: Filosofi, Teori dan Implikasi Penerapannya di Indonesia, Bayu Media Publishing, Malang. 2007.

Jimmly Asshiddiqie. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Menuju Negara Hukum yang Demokratis. Konstitusi Ekonomi.Konstitusi Pers. Kompas Media Nusantara. Jakarta.

---------------------------, Menuju Negara Hukum yang Demokratis, Bhuana Ilmu Populer, Jakarta. 2008,

Kementrian BUMN. Target Kinerja BUMN. Proyeksi Kinerja dan Agenda Implementasi Program. Master Plan BUMN Tahun 2002-2006. Jakarta, 2002.

Marthen Arie, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum dalam Penanaman Modal, Arus Timur, Makassar. 2012.

Susanti Adi Nugroho. Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia Dalam Teori Praktik Serta Penerapan Hukumnya. Kencana Prenada Media Group. Jakarta. 2012.

T. Mulya Lubis. Hukum dan Ekonomi. Sinar Harapan Jakarta. 1992.

Tony Prasentiantono. BUMN Indonesia. PT. Elex Media Komputindo. Jakarta. 2005.

Utrecht. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia. Unpad. Bandung. 1960.

Velasquez. Manuel G. Businness Ethics : Concept and cases.Singapore: Prentice-Hall. 1997.

W. Friedmann, The States and The Rule of Law in a Mixed Economy, Steven and Son, London.

Full Text: PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 2240 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) icon PDF

Download : 665 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	KRITERIA BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA YANG DIBERIKAN HAK MONOPOLI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Rory Jeff Akyuwen; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Criteria State Owned Enterprises; Monopoly

4.	Description	Abstract	Analysuing the position of monopoly State-Owned Enterprises in the perspective ofbusiness competition law which could potentially give rise to barriers in business competitionin particular concerning control over production branches are considered important andmaster his life much. Though it is excluded in law number 5 of 1999 concerning theprohibition of Monopolies and Anticompetitive Business practices are unhealthy, but thatshould not be considered a monopoly owned by the State-Owned Enterprises at the same timehave the power over the market, and all the power over its own market not obliging him tocarry on the practice of healthy competition. Criteria for State-Owned Enterprises can be given a monopoly in business competition law perspective, just look at the functions and Government intervention in the economy aimed at the earliest possible time the prosperity of the people. Criteria for State-Owned Enterprises can be given a monopoly should be seen from the form and objectives of the establishment of State-Owned Enterprises as well as the magnitude of the ownership of the Government's stake in it.

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2016-12-13

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/166

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/sasi.v22i2.166

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	SASI; Vol 22, No 2 (2016): Volume 22 Nomor 2, Juli - Desember 2016

12.	Language	English=en	id

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) License: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.