1. Home
  2. Vol 22, No 1 (2016)
  3. Fataruba

KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN AGAMA DAN KEKHUSUSAN BERACARANYA PASCA AMANDEMEN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1989 TENTANG PERADILAN AGAMA

Sabri Fataruba(1email)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Absolute competency Religious Courts after the amendment of Law Number 7 of 1989 both according to Act Number 3 of 2006 on the amendment of Act Number 7 of 1989, and according to Act Number 50 of 2009 on the Second Amendment Act Number 7 of 1989 on
Religious Courts become increasingly widespread with the presence of a special Courts in the province of Nangroe Aceh Darussalam, the competence not only in the field of civil law of Islam, but also including Islamic criminal law as well as other competencies stipulated in the by laws. The Religious Courts Competence to grow wider with their competence and
adjudicates disputes zakat, infaq, and economic syari’ah, then, specifically with regard to
the absolute competence Religious Competency Courts in examining and deciding disputes
syari’ah economy, the parties to the dispute are not only people who are Muslims, but
potencialy also for those non-Muslim who voluntary submit himself to the laws of Islam. In
addition, with the elimination of the option rights, the Religious Courts also authorized to
examine and decide property disputes and other civil cases related to the object of the dispute is set out in article 49 of Act Number 3 of 2006, when the subject of the dispute is between those who are Muslims. Specificity associated with litigation, with the potential for
non-Muslim people as a subject for dispute resolution in the syari’ah economy on the basis of voluntary submission to Islamic Law, then, the position of the principle of personality to
Islamization as a procedural specificity on the Religious Courts as a contained in article 1
paragraph 1 of Act Number 7 of 1989 is not absolute again. Another thing that is necessary
and should be regulated, but it is not regulated at all, both in the first amendment , namely Act Number 3 of 2006, and the second amendment, namely Act Number 50 of 2009 on amendment of Act Number 7 of 1989 about Religious Courts relating to the specificity of the hearing of the Religious Courts is a problem charging the case, but with the expansion of its jurisdiction as set forth in Article 49 in conjunction with article 50 of Act Number 3 of 2006, the provisions on court fees, as contained in Article 89 paragraph (1) of Act Number 7 of 1989 is no longer relevant, so if the judge would still apply, it is devinitely potentially also apply to the judge in the case decide imposition of court fee is not fair to the parties, especially for led by won in a yudicial decision.


Keywords


Competency; Specificity Proceedings; Religious Courts


DOI


10.47268/sasi.v22i1.178

Published


2016-06-15

How To Cite


APA: Fataruba, S. (2016). KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN AGAMA DAN KEKHUSUSAN BERACARANYA PASCA AMANDEMEN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1989 TENTANG PERADILAN AGAMA. SASI, 22(1), 59-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v22i1.178.
IEEE: S. Fataruba, "KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN AGAMA DAN KEKHUSUSAN BERACARANYA PASCA AMANDEMEN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1989 TENTANG PERADILAN AGAMA", SASI, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 59-73, Jun. 2016. Accessed on: Jun. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v22i1.178
Harvard: Fataruba, S., (2016). "KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN AGAMA DAN KEKHUSUSAN BERACARANYA PASCA AMANDEMEN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1989 TENTANG PERADILAN AGAMA". SASI, Volume 22(1), pp. 59-73. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v22i1.178 (Accessed on: 19 June 2025)
Chicago: Fataruba, Sabri. "KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN AGAMA DAN KEKHUSUSAN BERACARANYA PASCA AMANDEMEN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1989 TENTANG PERADILAN AGAMA." SASI 22, no. 1 (June 15, 2016): 59-73. Accessed June 19, 2025. doi:10.47268/sasi.v22i1.178
Vancouver: Fataruba S. KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN AGAMA DAN KEKHUSUSAN BERACARANYA PASCA AMANDEMEN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1989 TENTANG PERADILAN AGAMA. SASI [Internet]. 2016 Jun 15 [cited 2025 Jun 19];22(1):59-73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v22i1.178
MLA 8th: Fataruba, Sabri. "KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN AGAMA DAN KEKHUSUSAN BERACARANYA PASCA AMANDEMEN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1989 TENTANG PERADILAN AGAMA." SASI, vol. 22, no. 1, 15 Jun. 2016, pp. 59-73, doi:10.47268/sasi.v22i1.178. Accessed 19 Jun. 2025.
BibTeX: 
@article{SASI178,
		author = {Sabri Fataruba},
		title = {KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN AGAMA DAN KEKHUSUSAN BERACARANYA PASCA AMANDEMEN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1989 TENTANG PERADILAN AGAMA},
		journal = {SASI},
		volume = {22},
		number = {1},
		year = {2016},
		keywords = {Competency; Specificity Proceedings; Religious Courts},
		abstract = {Absolute competency Religious Courts after the amendment of Law Number 7 of 1989 both according to Act Number 3 of 2006 on the amendment of Act Number 7 of 1989, and according to Act Number 50 of 2009 on the Second Amendment Act Number 7 of 1989 onReligious Courts become increasingly widespread with the presence of a special Courts in the province of Nangroe Aceh Darussalam, the competence not only in the field of civil law of Islam, but also including Islamic criminal law as well as other competencies stipulated in the by laws. The Religious Courts Competence to grow wider with their competence andadjudicates disputes zakat, infaq, and economic syari’ah, then, specifically with regard tothe absolute competence Religious Competency Courts in examining and deciding disputessyari’ah economy, the parties to the dispute are not only people who are Muslims, butpotencialy also for those non-Muslim who voluntary submit himself to the laws of Islam. Inaddition, with the elimination of the option rights, the Religious Courts also authorized toexamine and decide property disputes and other civil cases related to the object of the dispute is set out in article 49 of Act Number 3 of 2006, when the subject of the dispute is between those who are Muslims. Specificity associated with litigation, with the potential fornon-Muslim people as a subject for dispute resolution in the syari’ah economy on the basis of voluntary submission to Islamic Law, then, the position of the principle of personality toIslamization as a procedural specificity on the Religious Courts as a contained in article 1paragraph 1 of Act Number 7 of 1989 is not absolute again. Another thing that is necessaryand should be regulated, but it is not regulated at all, both in the first amendment , namely Act Number 3 of 2006, and the second amendment, namely Act Number 50 of 2009 on amendment of Act Number 7 of 1989 about Religious Courts relating to the specificity of the hearing of the Religious Courts is a problem charging the case, but with the expansion of its jurisdiction as set forth in Article 49 in conjunction with article 50 of Act Number 3 of 2006, the provisions on court fees, as contained in Article 89 paragraph (1) of Act Number 7 of 1989 is no longer relevant, so if the judge would still apply, it is devinitely potentially also apply to the judge in the case decide imposition of court fee is not fair to the parties, especially for led by won in a yudicial decision.},
				issn = {2614-2961},		pages = {59--73}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v22i1.178},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/178}
		}
RefWorks:

   

Abdul Ghafur al-Anshari, Peradilan Agama di Indonesia Pasca UU No. 3 tahun 2006, Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2007.

Abd. Shomad, Hukum Islam: Penormaan Prinsip Shari’ah dalam Hukum Indonesia, Cet I. ( Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2010.

Abdul Ghafur al-Anshari, Peradilan Agama di Indonesia Pasca UU No. 3 tahun 2006, Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2007.

Cik Hasan Bisri, Peradilan Agama di Indonesia, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Ke-3, 2000.

Mardani, Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama & Mahkamah Syariah, Sinar Grafika, Cetakan Pertama, 2009.

Muhammad Daud Ali, Hukum Islam, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Islam di Indonesia, Edisi Keenam,, PT. RadjaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta 2000.

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 3706 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) icon PDF Download : 4811 times



 

Cited-By:

 

1. Kesesuaian Putusan Pengadilan Agama Ambon Nomor 220/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.Ab Tentang Izin Berpoligami
Iftin Yuninda Hart, La Ode Angga, Sabri Fataruba
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum  vol: 3  issue: 6  first page: 555  year: 2023  
Type: Journal [View Source]

 

2. Conceptualization of Gender Equality as the Protection of Women in Family Law Cases
Rizky Silvia Putri, Amar Ma'ruf
KnE Social Sciences  year: 2024  
Type: Journal [View Source]

 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN AGAMA DAN KEKHUSUSAN BERACARANYA PASCA AMANDEMEN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1989 TENTANG PERADILAN AGAMA
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Sabri Fataruba; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Competency; Specificity Proceedings; Religious Courts
 
4. Description Abstract Absolute competency Religious Courts after the amendment of Law Number 7 of 1989 both according to Act Number 3 of 2006 on the amendment of Act Number 7 of 1989, and according to Act Number 50 of 2009 on the Second Amendment Act Number 7 of 1989 onReligious Courts become increasingly widespread with the presence of a special Courts in the province of Nangroe Aceh Darussalam, the competence not only in the field of civil law of Islam, but also including Islamic criminal law as well as other competencies stipulated in the by laws. The Religious Courts Competence to grow wider with their competence andadjudicates disputes zakat, infaq, and economic syari’ah, then, specifically with regard tothe absolute competence Religious Competency Courts in examining and deciding disputessyari’ah economy, the parties to the dispute are not only people who are Muslims, butpotencialy also for those non-Muslim who voluntary submit himself to the laws of Islam. Inaddition, with the elimination of the option rights, the Religious Courts also authorized toexamine and decide property disputes and other civil cases related to the object of the dispute is set out in article 49 of Act Number 3 of 2006, when the subject of the dispute is between those who are Muslims. Specificity associated with litigation, with the potential fornon-Muslim people as a subject for dispute resolution in the syari’ah economy on the basis of voluntary submission to Islamic Law, then, the position of the principle of personality toIslamization as a procedural specificity on the Religious Courts as a contained in article 1paragraph 1 of Act Number 7 of 1989 is not absolute again. Another thing that is necessaryand should be regulated, but it is not regulated at all, both in the first amendment , namely Act Number 3 of 2006, and the second amendment, namely Act Number 50 of 2009 on amendment of Act Number 7 of 1989 about Religious Courts relating to the specificity of the hearing of the Religious Courts is a problem charging the case, but with the expansion of its jurisdiction as set forth in Article 49 in conjunction with article 50 of Act Number 3 of 2006, the provisions on court fees, as contained in Article 89 paragraph (1) of Act Number 7 of 1989 is no longer relevant, so if the judge would still apply, it is devinitely potentially also apply to the judge in the case decide imposition of court fee is not fair to the parties, especially for led by won in a yudicial decision.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2016-06-15
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/178
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/sasi.v22i1.178
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) SASI; Vol 22, No 1 (2016): Volume 22 Nomor 1, Januari - Juni 2016
 
12. Language English=en id
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

License: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


Copyright (c) 2019 Sabri Fataruba

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

Cited-By:

 

1. Kesesuaian Putusan Pengadilan Agama Ambon Nomor 220/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.Ab Tentang Izin Berpoligami
Iftin Yuninda Hart, La Ode Angga, Sabri Fataruba
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum  vol: 3  issue: 6  first page: 555  year: 2023  
Type: Journal [View Source]

 

2. Conceptualization of Gender Equality as the Protection of Women in Family Law Cases
Rizky Silvia Putri, Amar Ma'ruf
KnE Social Sciences  year: 2024  
Type: Journal [View Source]