Comparison of the Legal Regulation of Adultery as Social Control in Society: A Comparison Between Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam, and Turkey
), Maisa Maisa(2), Abdul Manan(3)
(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu, Palu, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu, Palu, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu, Palu, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Differences in adultery regulations in various countries in the world can be different, one of which is due to the ideology adopted by each country. Regulations related to adultery actually have relevance to state ideology and the values held and lived by society, including religious values.
Purpose of the Research: This research aims to analyze and compare adultery regulations based on the values and ideology that apply in a country by comparing adultery regulations between Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam, and Turkey.
Method of Research: This research is normative legal research by prioritizing historical, conceptual, legislative and comparative approaches.
Results of Research: The results of the research confirm that the development of adultery regulations in Indonesia has not been substantively facilitated since it was regulated in the WvSNI and even passed into the Criminal Code in 1946. This is because what is regulated in the Criminal Code as an official translation of Dutch criminal law is only an overspel that if translated into Indonesian is closer to the act of infidelity and not adultery. The regulation of adultery in the new national criminal law is officially regulated in the New Criminal Code, especially in Article 411 of the New Criminal Code, which is actually in accordance with the meaning of the offense of adultery in accordance with the values and culture of Indonesian society. Differences in the regulation of adultery in each country, especially countries with a majority Muslim population. This is a necessity because differences in adultery regulations in each country depend on the ideology adopted by each country. However, in general, in societies where the majority are Muslim, adultery is classified as a disgraceful act that deserves criminal sanctions as applied in Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei Darussalam, whereas Turkey, even though the majority of the population is Muslim, is based on a secularist view, only regulating adultery within the realm of law. private.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v30i2.2049
Published
2024-06-28
How To Cite
@article{SASI2049,
author = {Ida Lestiawati and Maisa Maisa and Abdul Manan},
title = {Comparison of the Legal Regulation of Adultery as Social Control in Society: A Comparison Between Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam, and Turkey},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {30},
number = {2},
year = {2024},
keywords = {Comparative Law; Adultery; Crime.},
abstract = {Introduction: Differences in adultery regulations in various countries in the world can be different, one of which is due to the ideology adopted by each country. Regulations related to adultery actually have relevance to state ideology and the values held and lived by society, including religious values.Purpose of the Research: This research aims to analyze and compare adultery regulations based on the values and ideology that apply in a country by comparing adultery regulations between Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam, and Turkey.Method of Research: This research is normative legal research by prioritizing historical, conceptual, legislative and comparative approaches.Results of Research: The results of the research confirm that the development of adultery regulations in Indonesia has not been substantively facilitated since it was regulated in the WvSNI and even passed into the Criminal Code in 1946. This is because what is regulated in the Criminal Code as an official translation of Dutch criminal law is only an overspel that if translated into Indonesian is closer to the act of infidelity and not adultery. The regulation of adultery in the new national criminal law is officially regulated in the New Criminal Code, especially in Article 411 of the New Criminal Code, which is actually in accordance with the meaning of the offense of adultery in accordance with the values and culture of Indonesian society. Differences in the regulation of adultery in each country, especially countries with a majority Muslim population. This is a necessity because differences in adultery regulations in each country depend on the ideology adopted by each country. However, in general, in societies where the majority are Muslim, adultery is classified as a disgraceful act that deserves criminal sanctions as applied in Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei Darussalam, whereas Turkey, even though the majority of the population is Muslim, is based on a secularist view, only regulating adultery within the realm of law. private.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {183--197} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v30i2.2049},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/2049}
}
Journal Article
Alhakim, Abdurrakhman. “Integral Approach To Cultural Reform: An Indonesian Criminal Justice System.” Legal Spirit 6, no. 1 (2022): 10–17. https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v6i1.3650.
Bahori, A., Mat Rashid, A., Yahya, M. A., Saifuddin, S., Mat Salleh, M. K. “Evidence and Prosecution of Out-of-Wedlock Pregnancies: A Legal Perspective of Syariah Criminal Offences in Malaysia.” UMM Journal of Legal Studies 14, no. 1 (2023): 1–30.
Basri. “Legal Review of Adultery Crimes.” Majority Science Journal 2, no. 1 (2024): 254–59.
Disantara, Fradhana Putra, Bayu Dwi Anggono, and A’An Efendi. “Mendudukkan Norma Etika: Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat Terhadap Relasi Etika Dan Hukum.” Rechtsidee 10, no. 2 (2022): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v10i0.773.
Flora, Henny Saida. “Restorative Justice in the New Criminal Code in Indonesia: A Prophetic Legal Study.” Rechtsidee 11 (December 2022). https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.836.
Friwarti, Sri Dwi, and Eka Fadhlianti. “Perbandingan Sanksi Bagi Pelaku Perzinahan Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dan Qanun Jinayat.” At-Tasyri’: Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Muamalah 15, no. 2 (2023): 205–24. https://doi.org/10.47498/tasyri.v15i2.2341.
Fuad, Zainul, Surya Darma, and Muhibbuthabry Muhibbuthabry. “Wither Qanun Jinayat? The Legal and Social Developments of Islamic Criminal Law in Indonesia.” Cogent Social Sciences 8, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2053269.
Ghosh, Yashomati, and Anirban Chakraborty. “Secularism, Multiculturalism and Legal Pluralism: A Comparative Analysis Between the Indian and Western Constitutional Philosophy.” Asian Journal of Legal Education 7, no. 1 (January 2020): 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/2322005819859674.
Hangabei, Sinung Mufti, Khudzaifah Dimyati, Absori, and Akhmad. “The Ideology of Law: Embodying the Religiosity of Pancasila in Indonesia Legal Concepts.” Law Reform 17, no. 1 (2021): 77–94.
Hapsoro, Widya Dwi. “The Law Enforcement against Adultery Crime Actors.” Ratio Legis Journal 1, no. 4 (2022): 1030–37.
Haris, Rifki Wahyudi. “Act Of Settlement By Investigators Against Alleged Adultery.” Estudiante Law Journal 3, no. 2 (2021): 309–20. https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v3i2.15822.
Haryadi, Wahyu. “Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Ruu Kuhp) Di Indonesia Perspektif Teori Pembaharuan Hukum.” Veritas 6, no. 1 (2020): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.34005/veritas.v6i1.566.
Irawatu, Arista Candra. “Politik Hukum Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana (Ruu Kuhp Asas Legalitas) Arista.” Adil Indonesia Jurnal 2, no. 1 (2019): 1–12.
Januarsyah, Mas Putra Zenno, Dwidja Priyatno, Somawijaya, and Widiada Gunakaya. “The Renewal Policy of the Adultery Concept in Article 411 of the Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Indonesian Criminal Code.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 1 (2023): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n1.a1.
Kurniawan, Kukuh Dwi. “Porn Videos as Evidence of Adultery: A Comparative Study of Indonesian Criminal Law and Islamic Law.” Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 30, no. 2 (2022): 166–81. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v30i2.20808.
Mahendra, Agustya Catur. “Ambiguity of Adultery Concept (Zina) in Criminal and Justice System (A Comparison between Indonesia, Pakistan, and Turkey).” IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) 4, no. 1 (2019): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v4i1.19614.
Minardi, Anton, Rini Afriantari, and Maesuroh Maesuroh. “The Implementation of Islamic Penal Law in Brunei Darussalam and International Society.” Socio Politica : Jurnal Ilmiah Jurusan Sosiologi 11, no. 1 (2022): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15575/socio-politica.v11i1.7961.
Mujamil, Ashari, and Ali Wafa. “Relevance of Verses on Politics in the Quran With the Constitution in Indonesia; Thematic Pancasila, Uud I945, and Controversial Articles in Criminal Code (Kuhp).” Istinbath 22, no. 2 (2023): 221–34. https://doi.org/10.20414/ijhi.v22i2.549.
Nasution, Nurul Isnina Syawalia Arifah. “Politik Hukum Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Dalam Rkuhp.” Khazanah Multidisiplin 2, no. 1 (2021): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.15575/km.v2i1.11636.
Negara, Tunggul Ansari Setia. “Normative Legal Research In Indonesia: Its Origins And Approaches.” ACLJ 4, no. 1 (2023): 5.
Nor, Mohd Roslan Mohd, and Muhammad Khalis Ibrahim. “From Separation between State and Religion to Religion-Freeing State: The Changing Faces of Secularism in Turkey.” Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies 13, no. 1 (2023): 85–114. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v13i1.85-114.
Prasetio, Dicky Eko. “Pancasila Sebagai Pengembangan Moral Virtual Dalam Perspektif Living Ideology.” Pancasila : Jurnal Keindonesiaan 3, no. 2 (2023): 127.
———. “Sejarah Dan Eksistensi Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah.” Sol Justicia 5, no. 2 (2022): 151.
Rasyid, Arbanur. “Expulsion for Adultery Perpetrators Muhshan at Panyabungan: An Islamic Law Perspective.” Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 55, no. 2 (2022): 265. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1157.
Rizki Maulana, Dhiauddin Tanjung. “Crime In Marriage : Juridical Analysis Of The Crime Of Domestic Infidelity Committed By Husbands And Mistresses.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 19, no. 1 (2024): 126–35.
Satriawan, Iwan, and Tanto Lailam. “Open Legal Policy Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 3 (October 2019): 559. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1636.
Simon Butt. “Indonesia’s New Criminal Code: Indigenising and Democratising Indonesian Criminal Law?” Griffith Law Review 32, no. 2 (2023): 97–108.
Srirejeki, Joko Setiyono, and Master. “Formulation of Restorative Justice Concept in Criminal Law Reform.” International Journal of Social Science Research and Review 5, no. 1 (2022): 159–65.
Sudarti. “Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Perzinaan Di Malaysia Dan Brunei Darussalam.” El-Mashlahah 11, no. 1 (2021): 78–96. https://doi.org/10.23971/elma.v11i1.2643.
Suprayogi, Rizqi. “Understanding Zina Law In Indonesia (After the Ratification of the Criminal Code Bill Becomes Law Number 1 of 2023 About the Criminal Code).” Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 5, no. 1 (2023): 291–304. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2363.
Topan, Muhammad. “Adultery as a Complaint Offense in Overcoming Free Sex Behavior.” International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources 3, no. 1 (2023): 38–45. https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.64.
Trini Hastuti, Luthfiyah. “Navigating Legal Boundaries: A Cross-Jurisdictional Comparison of Qanun Jinayat on Non-Muslims in Aceh and Brunei Darussalam.” Diktum: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 21, no. 2 (2023): 147–58. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v21i2.5339.
Wahyuningsih, Nunung Dian. “Perbandingan Hukum Perzinahan Dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Dengan Hukum Islam.” Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization 11, no. 2 (2023): 98.
Wan Ismail, Wan Abdul Fattah, Zuriatunfadzliah Sahdan, Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin, Lukman Abdul Mutalib, Nik Salida Suhaila Nik Saleh, Zulfaqar Mamat, Syh Noorul Madihah Syed Husin, and Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias. “Keruntuhan Institusi Kekeluargaan Dan Perzinaan Remaja Muslim Di Malaysia.” Kanun Jurnal Undang-Undang Malaysia 35, no. 1 (2023): 19–38. https://doi.org/10.37052/kanun.35(1)no2.
Widyawati, Anis. “Criminal Policy of Adultery in Indonesia.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 5, no. 1 (2020): 171–86. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i1.36786.
Yanto, M. “Juridical Study of the Criminal Act of Defamation Article 310 Paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Law Code (KUHP) M.” Journal of Law Science 5, no. 1 (2023): 40–52.
Book
Diantha, I Made Pasek. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2008.
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo. Dari Hukum Kolonial Ke Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: HuMA, Van Vollenhoven Institute, KITLV, Epistema Institute, 2014.
Thesis, Online/World Wide Web and Others
Muhammad Yasin, Normand Edwin Elnizar. “Mereka Yang Berjasa Dalam Penerjemahan ‘Resmi’ KUHP.” www.hukumonline.com, 2019. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mereka-yang-berjasa-dalam-penerjemahan-resmi-kuhp-lt5d536a5960acc/.
The Guardian. “Turkey Officially Changes Name at UN to Türkiye,” 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/03/turkey-changes-name-to-turkiye-as-other-name-is-for-the-birds.
: 414 times
Download : 249 times
Copyright (c) 2024 Ida Lestiawati, Maisa Maisa, Abdul Manan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
