Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Menjadi Objek Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 Dan Undang-Undang MD3)


*Paman Nurlette - Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
CrossMark

Abstract

The style of building our constitutional legal system today is very varied, it has implications for the shifting functions and rights of the State organs including the State organs of the Republic of Indonesia House of Representatives. To understand the conception of the functions and rights of the organs of the Republic of Indonesia Representative Council (DPR RI), it is seen as two sides of a coin (two sides of one coin). The DPR RI's inquiry right is a supervision that must be carried out on policies implemented by the executive. The KPK is an organ that is within the executive family, because it carries out investigations, investigations and prosecutions of corruption cases, such as those carried out by the Prosecutors' Office and the Police. Thus if the KPK is referred to as part of the judiciary. The task of investigation, investigation and prosecution is the task of the executive, not the legislative and judiciary. In addition, the KPK has been an institution that uses the State budget, so it should be overseen by the DPR. if the DPR cannot exercise the right to question the KPK on the grounds of independence. The reason is, it is not right to refuse the right to question the KPK. With the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) in the main essence of the decision which positions the KPK in institutions that are in the realm of power, the executive for carrying out the task of investigation, investigation and prosecution in corruption, which is actually the same as the authority of the police and prosecutors. The KPK is a state institution that is within the executive power cluster, so the KPK can be the object of using the DPR's questionnaire right as the people's representative who carries out the supervisory function. But the use of the questionnaire right by the DPR cannot be applied in the case that the KPK is carrying out its investigative, investigative and prosecution tasks. This means that the KPK cannot be carried out while the KPK is carrying out its duties.

Keywords

Corruption Eradication Commission; Questionnaire Rights; People's Representative Council

How To Cite


APA: Nurlette, P. (2020). Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Menjadi Objek Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 Dan Undang-Undang MD3). SASI, 26(1), 75-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i1.213.
IEEE: P. Nurlette, "Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Menjadi Objek Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 Dan Undang-Undang MD3)", SASI, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 75-88, May. 2020. Accessed on: Sep. 19, 2021. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i1.213
Harvard: Nurlette, P., (2020). "Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Menjadi Objek Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 Dan Undang-Undang MD3)". SASI, Volume 26(1), pp. 75-88. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i1.213 (Accessed on: 19 September 2021)
Chicago: Nurlette, Paman. "Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Menjadi Objek Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 Dan Undang-Undang MD3)." SASI 26, no. 1 (May 19, 2020): 75-88. Accessed September 19, 2021. doi:10.47268/sasi.v26i1.213
Vancouver: Nurlette P. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Menjadi Objek Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 Dan Undang-Undang MD3). SASI [Internet]. 2020 May 19 [cited 2021 Sep 19];26(1):75-88. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i1.213
MLA 8th: Nurlette, Paman. "Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Menjadi Objek Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 Dan Undang-Undang MD3)." SASI, vol. 26, no. 1, 19 May. 2020, pp. 75-88, doi:10.47268/sasi.v26i1.213. Accessed 19 Sep. 2021.
BibTeX:
@article{SASI213,
			author = {Paman Nurlette},
			title = {Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Menjadi Objek Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat             (Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi  Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 Dan Undang-Undang MD3)},
			journal = {SASI},
			volume = {26},
			number = {1},
			year = {2020},
			keywords = {Corruption Eradication Commission; Questionnaire Rights; People's Representative Council},
			abstract = {The style of building our constitutional legal system today is very varied, it has implications for the shifting functions and rights of the State organs including the State organs of the Republic of Indonesia House of Representatives. To understand the conception of the functions and rights of the organs of the Republic of Indonesia Representative Council (DPR RI), it is seen as two sides of a coin (two sides of one coin). The DPR RI's inquiry right is a supervision that must be carried out on policies implemented by the executive. The KPK is an organ that is within the executive family, because it carries out investigations, investigations and prosecutions of corruption cases, such as those carried out by the Prosecutors' Office and the Police. Thus if the KPK is referred to as part of the judiciary. The task of investigation, investigation and prosecution is the task of the executive, not the legislative and judiciary. In addition, the KPK has been an institution that uses the State budget, so it should be overseen by the DPR. if the DPR cannot exercise the right to question the KPK on the grounds of independence. The reason is, it is not right to refuse the right to question the KPK. With the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) in the main essence of the decision which positions the KPK in institutions that are in the realm of power, the executive for carrying out the task of investigation, investigation and prosecution in corruption, which is actually the same as the authority of the police and prosecutors. The KPK is a state institution that is within the executive power cluster, so the KPK can be the object of using the DPR's questionnaire right as the people's representative who carries out the supervisory function. But the use of the questionnaire right by the DPR cannot be applied in the case that the KPK is carrying out its investigative, investigative and prosecution tasks. This means that the KPK cannot be carried out while the KPK is carrying out its duties.},
					issn = {2614-2961},			pages = {75--88}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v26i1.213},
					url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/213}
		}
		
RefWorks:

Citation format: 

Buku

[1] Logemann, J.H.A, (1985). Over De Theorie Van Enn Stelling Staatrecht, Jogyakarta : Gajah Mada.

[2] Isra, Saldi. (2010). Pergeseran Fungsi Legislatif Menguatnya Model Legislasi Parlementer Dalam Sistem Presidensial Indonesia, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

[3] Manan, Bagir. (2005). DPR, DPD, dan MPR dalam UUD 1945 Baru, Yogyakarta: FH-UII Press.

[4] Soemantri, Sri. (1993). Tentang Lembaga-lembaga Negara Menurut UUD 1945, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

[5] Arifin, Firmansyah, dkk. (2005). Lembaga Negara dan Sengketa Kewenangan Antar Lembaga Negara, Jakarta: Konsorsium Reformasi Hukum Nasional.

[6] Indrayana, Denny. (2016). Jangan Bunuh KPK, Malang: Intrans Publishing.

[7] Alrasid, Harun. (1999). Pengisian Jabatan Presiden, Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

[8] Wahyudi, Zaid. (2017). Penyelagunaan Kekuasaan : Gagalnya Sistem Kendali Diri, Rumah Pengatahuan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

[9] S.S.T, Arifin. (1998). Fungsi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Menurut UUD 1945, Suatu Studi Analisis Mengenai Pengaturannya Tahun 1966-1997. Jakarta: Sekolah Tinggi.

Jurnal dan Lain-Lain

[10] Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2013). Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Setelah Perubahan Keempat UUD Tahun 1945, Makalah dalam seminar Pembangunan Hukum Nasional VIII, Denpasar 14-18 Juli 2013.

[11] Manan, Bagir. (2018). Hak Angket Sebagai Kekuasaan Pengawasan DPR. Jurnal Varia Peradilan XXXIII (387): 6-23.

[12] Hak Angket DPR, KPK dan Pemberantasan Korupsi 126 | Volume 4 Nomor 2, Desember 2018

[13] Miranda, R.A. (2009). Kedudukan Komisi Independen Sebagai Auxiliary Institutions dan Relevansinya Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, kerja sama MK dan PSKN FH Universitas Padjadjaran 1 (1): 53-71. KPK. 2018. Tanggapan KPK Atas 10 Rekomendasi Pansus Hak Angket DPR.

[14] https://kumparan.com/@kumparan-news/tanggapan-kpk-atas-10-rekomendasi-pansus-hak angket-dpr. 28 Juli 2018 (22.30). KPK. 2018. KPK Sebut Lembaga Pengawas Usulan Pansus Angket Mengada-ada.

[15] Teori dan Politik Konstitusi, Yogyakarta: FH UII Press. DPR. 2017. Paripurna DPR Sahkan Usulan Hak Angket KPK.

[16] http://www.berita-satu.com/nasional-kpk/427713-paripurna-dprsahkan-usulan-hak-angket kpk. html. 20 Juli 2018 (19.05). DPR. 2017. Ini Sederet Alasan DPR Gulirkan Hak Angket KPK.

[17] https://news.detik.com/berita/d3486828/ini-sederet-alasandpr-gulirkan-hak-angket-kpk. 15 Juli 2018 (15.00). DPR. 2018. Empat Rekomendasi Pansus Angket DPR Untuk KPK.

[18] http://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2018/02/14/empatrekomendasi-pansus-angket-dpr-Laporan Panitia Angket DPR RI Tentang Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Yang Diatur Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

[19] Soerjono, S. 2007. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta.

[20] Yusril, I.M. 2018. Menurut Yusril Hak Angket Bisa Ditujukan Untuk Semua Lembaga. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/09/14/17595501/menurut-yusril-hak-ang-ket bisaditujukan-untuk-semua-lembaga. 15 Juli 2018 (20.00).

[21] Hak Angket DPR, KPK dan Pemberantasan Korupsi Volume 4 Nomor 2, Desember 2018 | 127 Peraturan Perundangan-Undangan dan Putusan Hakim.

194 times.
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) Views: 150 times.






Copyright (c) 2020 Paman Nurlette

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.