Famari (Penghinaan Berujung Pada Tradisi Yang Mampu Menyebabkan Sanksi/Denda Adat, Tradisi Pada Masyarakat Misool Barat, Kepulauan Raja Ampat)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.225Keywords:
Famari, Traditions, IndigenousAbstract
One of the traditions that exist in the people of the West Misool islands is the Famari tradition. This tradition is usually carried out when someone from another village humiliates people from another village. This tradition is a tradition from generation to generation, but is only an oral story and has never been written into a written story. This study aims to determine the implementation model of the Famari tradition in communities in West Misool District, Raja Ampat Islands, and the methods used by indigenous peoples to maintain the Famari tradition in West Misool District, Raja Ampat Islands. This research is a qualitative descriptive study using a social phenomenological paradigm. Sources of data for analyzing research problems were obtained from two sources, namely: primary data and secondary data. The results show that the origin of the Famari tradition was created by the ancestors of the West Misool community in creating order, in which there are universal values such as the principle of mutual cooperation, human social function and property in society, consent as a general power, the principle of representation and deliberation. What causes the emergence of the Famari tradition is that in restoring moral balance, it creates collective awareness from community groups to neutralize differences. The Famari tradition does not see the time when it must be carried out, the form of fines in the Famari tradition is determined based on an agreement, the number of people who follow the tradition has no clear limit. Customary fines payment techniques in the Famari tradition are carried out after the party. Without an official invitation, residents came and got involved, to take part in Famari activities. The Famari tradition was created to avoid degrading other social groups, where there are sanctions as punishment for those who are guilty and restore moral balance in society.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
[1] Apriyani, Rini. (2018). Keberadaan Sanksi Adat Dalam Penerapan Hukum Pidana Adat. Jurnal Hukum Prioritas, 6 (3), 227-246. https://trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/prioris/article/view/3178.
[2] Dewantara, Asep. (2013). Peran Elit Masyarakat: Studi Kebertahanan Adat Istiadat di Kampung Adat Urug Bogor, Buletin Al-Turas, 19 (1), 89-117. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v19i1.3703.https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v19i1.3703
[3] Humaeni, Ayatullah. (2015). Tabu Perempuan Dalam Budaya Masyarakat Banten. Jurnal Humaniora, 27 (2), 174-185. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v19i1.3703.https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v19i1.3703
[4] Hartini, Agnesia., Linda, Veronoka. (2017). Pembukuan Kasus Hukum Adat Sebagai Upaya Mengkonsistenkan Sanksi Adat Bagi Masyarakat Di Dusun Empaong Kecamatan Sekadau Hulu Kabupaten Sekadau. Jurnal PEKAN, 2 (1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.31932/jpk.v2i1.195.
[5] Harahap, Anwar Sadat., Hasibuan, Ahmad Laut., Siregar, Taufik. (2018). Kearifan Lokal Dalam bentuk Sanksi Hukum Bagi Pelanggar Pada Masyarakat Adat Batak Bagian Selatan. Anthropos: Jurnal Antropologi Sosial dan Budaya, 3 (2), 122-130. https://doi.org/10.24114/antro.v3i2.8791https://doi.org/10.24114/antro.v3i2.8791
[6] Hardiman, Yogi., Kotijah, Siti., Sina, La. (2019). Restorative Justice Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Ringan Yang Telah Diberi Sanksi Adat. Mulawarman Law Review. l4 (1), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v4i1.48.https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v4i1.48
[7] Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra. (2016). Hukum (Sanksi) PidanaAdat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45 (2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.2.2016.123-130.https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.2.2016.123-130
[8] Mulyono, Sutrisno Purwohadi. (2014). Kebijakan Sinoptik Penerapan Hukum Adat Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. Jurnal Yustisia, 3 (2), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11096.https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11096
[9] Rahman, Abdul., Jamhuri., Irwansyah. (2018), Sanksi Adat Bagi Pelaku Kekerasan Fisik Ditinjau Menurut Hukum Pidana Islam. Jurnal Petita, 3 (2), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v3i2.49.https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v3i2.49
[10] Dillistone, F.W. (2002). Daya Kekuatan Simbol, The Power Of Symbols, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
[11] Jenks, Chris. (2013). Cultur, Studi Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
[12] Muhammad, Bushar. (2006). Azas-Azas Hukum Adat, Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
[13] Ritzer, George., Goodman, Douglas J. (2011). Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
[14] Scharf, Betty R. (2004). Sosiologi Agama. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
[15] Turner, Bryan S. (2012). Teori Sosial Dari Klasik Sampai Postmodern. Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Muhamad Yusuf, Muhammad Syukri Nawir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but it does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
