Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perikanan (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan)

Astuti Nur Fadillah; Muhammad Insan Anshari Al Aspary

doi:10.47268/sasi.v26i2.280

Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perikanan (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan)

Astuti Nur Fadillah⁽¹⁾, Muhammad Insan Anshari Al Aspary⁽²⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
(2) Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

For the fisheries sector in Indonesia, Law No. 31 of 2004 Jo. Law No. 45 of 2009 concerning Fisheries and in the Philippines the 1998 Philippine Fisheries Code applies, which is a regulation governing prison administration. Indonesian fisheries law has not yet enacted a ban on rare and endangered species. The Philippine fisheries law does not yet impose legal sanctions to cancel permit documents. The formulation of an emergency prison sentence or a Philippine fisheries law fine is relatively heavier than Indonesia. For the concept of accountability of the court by the two countries still imposes court responsibility only on corporate management. Law enforcement in the field of fisheries in Indonesia and the Philippines can be more effective on the prohibition of certain activities or activities related to liability related to relationships that can be accounted for, so that they can be accounted for in the right way, to help and overcome problems related to fisheries.

Keywords

Fisheries Crime; Criminal Law Enforcement; Criminal Liability

DOI

10.47268/sasi.v26i2.280

Published

2020-06-04

How To Cite

APA: Fadillah, A.N., & Al Aspary, M.I. (2020). Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perikanan (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan). SASI, 26(2), 225-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i2.280.

IEEE: A.N. Fadillah, and M.I. Al Aspary, "Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perikanan (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan)", SASI, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 225-241, Jun. 2020. Accessed on: Apr. 24, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i2.280

Harvard: Fadillah, A.N., and Al Aspary, M.I., (2020). "Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perikanan (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan)". SASI, Volume 26(2), pp. 225-241. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i2.280 (Accessed on: 24 April 2024)

Chicago: Fadillah, Astuti Nur, and Muhammad Insan Anshari Al Aspary. "Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perikanan (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan)." SASI 26, no. 2 (June 4, 2020): 225-241. Accessed April 24, 2024. doi:10.47268/sasi.v26i2.280

Vancouver: Fadillah AN, Al Aspary MI. Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perikanan (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan). SASI [Internet]. 2020 Jun 4 [cited 2024 Apr 24];26(2):225-241. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i2.280

MLA 8th: Fadillah, Astuti Nur, and Muhammad Insan Anshari Al Aspary. "Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perikanan (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan)." SASI, vol. 26, no. 2, 4 Jun. 2020, pp. 225-241, doi:10.47268/sasi.v26i2.280. Accessed 24 Apr. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{SASI280,
		author = {Astuti Fadillah and Muhammad Al Aspary},
		title = {Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perikanan (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan)},
		journal = {SASI},
		volume = {26},
		number = {2},
		year = {2020},
		keywords = {Fisheries Crime; Criminal Law Enforcement; Criminal Liability},
		abstract = {For the fisheries sector in Indonesia, Law No. 31 of 2004 Jo. Law No. 45 of 2009 concerning Fisheries and in the Philippines the 1998 Philippine Fisheries Code applies, which is a regulation governing prison administration. Indonesian fisheries law has not yet enacted a ban on rare and endangered species. The Philippine fisheries law does not yet impose legal sanctions to cancel permit documents. The formulation of an emergency prison sentence or a Philippine fisheries law fine is relatively heavier than Indonesia. For the concept of accountability of the court by the two countries still imposes court responsibility only on corporate management. Law enforcement in the field of fisheries in Indonesia and the Philippines can be more effective on the prohibition of certain activities or activities related to liability related to relationships that can be accounted for, so that they can be accounted for in the right way, to help and overcome problems related to fisheries.},
				issn = {2614-2961},		pages = {225--241}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v26i2.280},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/280}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Buku

[1] Amiruddin & Asikin, H. Z. (2008). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.

[2] Adji, I. S. (2011). Pergeseran Hukum Pidana, Jakarta : Diadit Media Press.

[3] Arief, B. N. (2011). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta : Rajawali Pers..

[4] Bouman, P. J. (1961). Sosiologi Pengertian Dan Masalah. Semarang: Yayasan Kanisius.

[5] Cruz, P. D. (1993). A Modern Approach to Comparative Law. Boston : Kluwer.

[6] Fauzi, A. (2005) Kebijakan Perikanan dan Kelautan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

[7] Krier, J. E. dalam Hardjasoemantri, K. (1993). Hukum Tata Lingkungan Edisi Kelima Cetakan Kesepuluh. Yogyakarta : Gadjah Mada University Press.

[8] Muladi & Priyatno, D. (2007). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta : Kencana.

[9] Parthiana, I W. (2003). Hukum Pidana Internasional Dan Ekstradisi. Bandung : Yrama Widya.

[10] Pakes, F. (2010). Comparative Criminal Justice. Cullompton : Willan Publishing.

[11] Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : UI-Press.

[12] Syaukani, I & Thohari, A. (2004). Dasar-Dasar Politik Hukum, Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.

[13] Surachman, R. M, & Maringka, J. S. (2015). Peran Jaksa Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Kawasan Asia Pasifik. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.

[14] Surachman, R. M. Dkk. (2015) Eksistensi Kejaksaan Dalam Konstitusi Di berbagai Negara. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.

[15] Widodo, J dan Suadi. (2006). Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Perikanan Laut. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

[16] Wijayanta, T & Firmansyah, H. (2011). Perbedaan Pendapat Dalam Putusan Pengadilan. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Yustisia.

Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi dan Lain-Lain

[17] Santoso, T. (2007). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Depok: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Indonesia.

Online/World Wide Web

[18] http://www.fish.govt.nz/ennz/Press/Southland+company+and+director+sentenced+on+fishing+reporting+charges.htm. (Diakses pada tanggal 3 Mei 2019).

[19] https://psa.gov.ph/fisheries-situationer. (Diakses pada tanggal 3 Mei 2019).

[20] http://www.pulauseribu.co/2011/10/krisis-perikanan-dunia.html. (Diakses pada tanggal 3 Mei 2019)

[21] Sandra Conchie (Ed), $22.500 Fine For illegal Market’s Fish, <http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10833319>. (Diakses pada tanggal 3 Mei 2019).

Full Text: PDF