E-Commerce Dispute Resolution Through Online Dispute Resolution
), Fe Fikran Alfurqon(5)
(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari, Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari, Indonesia
(5) School of Law, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The rapid growth of the e-commerce industry has brought significant economic benefits. Still, it also raises challenges regarding dispute resolution that is efficient, fair and meets the needs of all parties.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine and analyze the use of Dispute Resolution in E-commerce (Electronic Commerce) through the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) mechanism as a solution to provide easier and faster access to justice in the context of online business transactions.
Methods of the Research This study uses doctrinal legal research with a statute and conceptual approach. It uses primary legal materials that are authoritative and binding, such as laws and regulations, and secondary legal materials. This study uses legal interpretation techniques as analysis techniques.
Results of the Research: The results of this study are expected to provide deeper insight into the potential of ODR in handling e-commerce disputes and its impact on access to justice for all parties involved. This research can also provide recommendations to the government, the e-commerce industry, and other relevant institutions to consider and develop a better framework for integrating ODR in e-commerce dispute resolution to ensure fairness and satisfaction of online businesses.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v31i2.2865
Published
2025-07-01
How To Cite
@article{SASI2865,
author = {Jusman Dg. Takenang and Ma'ruf Akib and Sudirman Sudirman and Wahyudi Umar and Fe Alfurqon},
title = {E-Commerce Dispute Resolution Through Online Dispute Resolution},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {31},
number = {2},
year = {2025},
keywords = {E-Commerce; Dispute Resolution; Online Dispute Resolution.},
abstract = {Introduction: The rapid growth of the e-commerce industry has brought significant economic benefits. Still, it also raises challenges regarding dispute resolution that is efficient, fair and meets the needs of all parties.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine and analyze the use of Dispute Resolution in E-commerce (Electronic Commerce) through the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) mechanism as a solution to provide easier and faster access to justice in the context of online business transactions.Methods of the Research This study uses doctrinal legal research with a statute and conceptual approach. It uses primary legal materials that are authoritative and binding, such as laws and regulations, and secondary legal materials. This study uses legal interpretation techniques as analysis techniques.Results of the Research: The results of this study are expected to provide deeper insight into the potential of ODR in handling e-commerce disputes and its impact on access to justice for all parties involved. This research can also provide recommendations to the government, the e-commerce industry, and other relevant institutions to consider and develop a better framework for integrating ODR in e-commerce dispute resolution to ensure fairness and satisfaction of online businesses.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {117--129} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v31i2.2865},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/2865}
}
Abbasli, Taleh. “Can Online Dispute Resolution Prevail Over the Traditional Methods of Resolution?” Baku State University Law Review 8, no. 1 (2022): 21–43.
Association, American Arbitration. “About American Arbitration Aassociation.” ADR.org, 2023.
———. “American Arbitration Aassociation Rules, Forms & Fees.” ADR.org, 2023.
Atsiq, Athaya, and Amelia Husna. “E-Commerce Dispute Settlement Through Online Arbitration in Indonesia.” International Journal of Ethnoscience Bio-Informatic Innovation Invention and Techno-Science 1, no. 02 (2022). https://doi.org/10.54482/ijebiiits.v1i02.176.
Aziz, Muhammad Faiz, and Muhamamd Arif Hidayah. “Perlunya Pengaturan Khusus Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Di Indonesia Untuk Fasilitasi Penyelesaian Sengketa E-Commerce.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 9, no. 2 (2020): 275. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i2.449.
Barnett, Jeremy, and Philip Treleaven. “Algorithmic Dispute Resolution-The Automation of Professional Dispute Resolution Using AI and Blockchain Technologies.” Computer Journal 61, no. 3 (2018): 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxx103.
Benton, Gary L, and Steven K Andersen. “Technology Arbitration Revisited.” Dispute Resolution Journal 74, no. 4 (2019): 1.
BRIN/Bappenas/KemenpanRB. “Cetak Biru Ekosistem Pengetahuan Dan Inovasi,” 2021.
Cashman, Peter, and Eliza Ginnivan. “Digital Justice: Online Resolution of Minor Civil Disputes and the Use of Digital Technology in Complex Litigation and Class Actions.” Macquarie Law Journal 19 (2019): 39–79.
CIETAC. CIETAC Arbitration Rules (2015).
Commission, China International Economic and Trade Arbitration. “CIETAC.” casettle.odrcloud.cn, 2023.
Effendi, Fauzan, Vince Ratnawati, and Yesi Mutia Basri. “Penentuan Target, Strategi Dan Faktor- Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Optimalisasi Pajak Daerah.” Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia 04, no. 02 (2021): 95–116.
Ermakova, Elena P., and Evgenia E. Frolova. “Using Artificial Intelligence in Dispute Resolution.” Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies 254 (2022): 131–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_11.
Exon, Susan Nauss. “Ethics and Online Dispute Resolution: From Evolution to Revolution.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 32, no. 4 (2017): 609–64.
Frey, Martin A. “Does ADR Offer Second Class Justice?” Tulsa Law Journal 36, no. 4 (2000): 727–66.
Gerarita Sitompul, Meline, M Syaifuddin, and Annalisa Yahanan. “Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): Prospek Penyelesaian Sengketa E-Commerce Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Renaissance 1, no. 2 (2016): 75–93.
Habib, Ahmad, Al Fikry, and Nurul Fibrianti. “Online Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Dispute Settlement in the Digital World.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies 3, no. 1 (2022): 2022.
Hadi Alamri. “Kedudukan Keterangan Ahli Sebagai Alat Bukti Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.” Lex Privatum 5, no. 1 (2017): 31–38.
Hendrayana, Yayan. “Peran Keterampilan Negosiasi Terhadap Manajemen Konflik Melalui Intermediasi Efektivitas Komunikasi.” Parameter 5, no. 1 (2021): 113–26. https://doi.org/10.37751/parameter.v5i1.144.
Hidayat, Dudung. “Formalisasi Mediasi Sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata.” Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 7, no. 9 (2022): 15438–56.
Hudiyanto, Sabar Wahyono, Sarwin Kiko Napitupulu, Aryanti Dwi Rachmawati, Aldi Firmansyah Rubini, and Riri Lastiar Situmorang. Kajian Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan: Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). Departemen Perlindungan Konsumen. no. 1. Jakarta, 2017.
———. “Online Dispute Resolution – ODR.” In Kajian Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan: Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). Jakarta: Departemen Perlindungan Konsumen, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781526511355.chapter-016.
Iswara, Vizta Dana. “Analisis Pentingnya Implementasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Online Di Indonesia.” Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 13, no. 1 (2021): 15. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v13i1.245.
Karim Benyekhlef, and Fabien Gélinas. “Online Dispute Resolution.” Lex Electronica 10, no. 02 (2005): 87–96. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch006.
Larosa, Wardaniman. “Application of Online Arbitration to Dispute Resolution E-Commerce Business in Indonesia (In Academic Discourse and Practice).” Ajesh 2, no. 3 (2023): 228–46. https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v2i3.56.
Latifah, Emmy, Anis H Bajrektarević, and Moch N Imanullah. “Digital Justice in Online Dispute Resolution: The Shifting From Traditional to the New Generation of Dispute Resolution.” Brawijaya Law Journal 6, no. 1 (2019): 27–37. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2019.006.01.02.
Mania, Karolina. “Online Dispute Resolution: The Future of Justice.” International Comparative Jurisprudence 1, no. 1 (2015): 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icj.2015.10.006.
McCafferty, Anne. “Internet Contracting and E-Commerce Disputes: International and United States Personal Jurisdiction.” In The Global Business Law Review, 2:95, 2011.
Nada Rohani, and Rani Apriani. “Efektifitas Negosiasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Penerapan Online Dispute Resolution Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19.” Jurnal Kertha Semaya 10, no. 11 (2022): 2609.
Nation, Association of Southeast Asian. “ASEAN Launches Guideline on Online Dispute Resolution for Consumers - ASEAN Main Portal.” asean.org/, 2022.
Paypal. “Dispute Resolution Process for Sellers | PayPal AI.” Paypal.com, 2023.
Putri, Dheka Ermelia. “Application of Online Dispute Resolution (Odr) in International and Indonesia Domain Names Disputes.” Lampung Journal of International Law 1, no. 1 (2020): 19. https://doi.org/10.25041/lajil.v1i1.2021.
Rifdah, Ayudia Nur, Mulyani Zulaeha, and Yulia Qamariyanti. “Commercial Business Dispute Settlement Through Online Non-Litigation Dispute Settlement in Indonesia.” Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2021): 267–87. https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v6i2.247.
Rizkiana, Rina Elsa. “The Future of Online Dispute Resolution: Building A Framework for E-Commerce Dispute Resolution in Indonesia.” The Lawpreneurship Journal 1, no. 2 (2021): 114–38. https://doi.org/10.21632/tlj.1.2.114-138.
Rule, Colin. “Designing a Global Online Dispute Resolution System : Lessons Learned from EBay.” University of St. Thomas Law Journal 13, no. 2 (2017): 354–69.
Sagala, Lusiona M, and Devi S H Marpaung. “Penegakkan Hukum Serta Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Online Marketplace Melalui Mekanisme Online Dispute Resolution.” Widya Yuridika 4, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v4i2.2414.
Sela, Ayelet. “The Effect of Online Technologies on Dispute Resolution System Design: Antecedents, Current Trends, and Future Directions.” Lewis & Clark Law Review 21, no. August (2017): 635–80.
Tan, Vivi. “Online Dispute Resolution for Small Civil Claims in Victoria: A New Paradigm in Civil Justice.” Deakin Law Review 24, no. 9505781573 (2019): 101–38. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2019vol24no1art873.
Tang, Zheng. “An Effective Dispute Resolution System for Electronic Consumer Contracts.” Computer Law and Security Report 23, no. 1 (2007): 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2006.11.002.
Thompson, Darin. “Addressing ‘New’ Challenges to ODR Implementation.” Scl.org, 2023.
Turel, Ofir, and Yufei Yuan. Online Dispute Resolution Services: Justice, Concepts, and Challenges. Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation: Second Edition, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49629-6_25.
UN Commission on International Trade Law. United Nations Uncitral Technical Notes on Online Dispute Resolution (2016).
Vacek, Václav. “ODR: A Look at History.” Klinicka Mikrobiologie a Infekcni Lekarstvi 10, no. 1 (2004): 3–4.
Verma, Deepak, Anshu Banwari, and Neerja Pande. “Online Dispute Resolution.” In Intech Open, 13, 2018.
Wahid, Soleh H. “Formulation of a Risk-Based Online Dispute Resolution Model for E-Commerce in Indonesia: Legal Framework and Its Application.” International Journal of Arts and Humanities Studies 3, no. 2 (2023): 9–23. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijahs.2023.3.2.2.
Wang, Yuan. Introduction and Comparison of Chinese Arbitration Institutions. School of Law, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 2013.
White, Nicola. “Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mediation and Conciliation.” Law Reform Commission, 2010.
Widayanti, Rahayu. “Layanan E-Commerce Mendominasi Pasar Ekonomi Digital Indonesia Halaman All - Kompas.Com.” money.kompas.com, 2023.
Wilson-Evered, Elisabeth, and John Zeleznikow. “Artificial Intelligence and Online Family Dispute Resolution.” Law, Governance and Technology Series 45 (2021): 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64645-5_2.
Winarta, Frans Hendra. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa- Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia & Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika Offset, 2011.
: 75 times
Download : 24 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | E-Commerce Dispute Resolution Through Online Dispute Resolution |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Jusman Dg. Takenang; Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country |
Ma'ruf Akib; Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Sudirman Sudirman; Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country |
Wahyudi Umar; Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Kendari; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Fe Fikran Alfurqon; School of Law, Australian National University, Canberra; Australia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | E-Commerce; Dispute Resolution; Online Dispute Resolution. |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: The rapid growth of the e-commerce industry has brought significant economic benefits. Still, it also raises challenges regarding dispute resolution that is efficient, fair and meets the needs of all parties.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine and analyze the use of Dispute Resolution in E-commerce (Electronic Commerce) through the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) mechanism as a solution to provide easier and faster access to justice in the context of online business transactions.Methods of the Research This study uses doctrinal legal research with a statute and conceptual approach. It uses primary legal materials that are authoritative and binding, such as laws and regulations, and secondary legal materials. This study uses legal interpretation techniques as analysis techniques.Results of the Research: The results of this study are expected to provide deeper insight into the potential of ODR in handling e-commerce disputes and its impact on access to justice for all parties involved. This research can also provide recommendations to the government, the e-commerce industry, and other relevant institutions to consider and develop a better framework for integrating ODR in e-commerce dispute resolution to ensure fairness and satisfaction of online businesses. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2025-07-01 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/2865 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/sasi.v31i2.2865 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | SASI; Volume 31 Issue 2, June 2025 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
License: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2025 Jusman Dg. Takenang, Ma'ruf Akib, Sudirman Sudirman, Wahyudi Umar, Fe Fikran Alfurqon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
