Traditional Community Participation Model in Conflict Resolution among Two Mining Companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v31i4.3408Keywords:
Social Conflict Resolution, Traditional Community Participation Model, Impactsof Mining Companies.Abstract
Introduction: Mining operations in North Sumatera Province have generated both economic opportunities and socio-environmental challenges for surrounding traditional communities. The coexistence of PT. Agincourt Resources in Batangtoru and PT. Sorikmas Mining in Naga Juang has triggered land disputes, environmental degradation, and social polarization, reflecting the tension between corporate expansion and the preservation of customary (adat) values.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to map and classify sources of social conflict between mining companies and local adat communities, examine the dynamics of traditional institutions, and develop a participatory conflict resolution model that integrates local wisdom and community empowerment.
Methods of the Research: Using a mixed-method design, this research combines quantitative surveys with qualitative approaches, including in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation. Data were analyzed using parametric statistics and qualitative matrix analysis to identify socio-cultural dynamics, conflict patterns, and the institutional role of adat in mediating disputes.
Results of the Research: The findings show that mining activities have disrupted social cohesion and traditional governance structures, particularly regarding ulayat (customary) land rights. Nonetheless, the study introduces a Traditional Community Participation Model emphasizing adat leaders as mediators in conflict resolution. This model reinforces social capital, restores trust, and enhances collaboration between companies, communities, and government institutions. The research offers a novel integrative framework linking customary institutions with sustainable conflict management and responsible mining governance in Indonesia.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Ambarita, Ledy Yakin. “Consequences of PT. Sorikmas Mining on Social Economic Polarization of Tarutung Panjang Village Community, Naga Juang Sub-District, Mandailing Natal Regency.” Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2013.
Bailey, Kenneth D.. Methods of Social Research. Minnesota: Free Press ; Collier Macmillan, 1982.
Cerya, Efni, and Afriva Khaidir. “Implementasi Hukum Pengelolaan Tambang Galian C Di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Literatur.” JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) 6, no. 1 (2021): 56. https://doi.org/10.29210/3003755000.
Creswell, John W.., and J. David Creswell. Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, 1994.
Febrian, and Aldri Frinaldi. “Penguatan Lembaga Masyarakat Adat Dan Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Pertambangan Timah Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 3 Tahun 2020 Di Bangka Belitung.” Vol. 06, 2024. https://journalversa.com/s/index.php/jhm.
Glass, Gene V., Barry. McGaw, and Mary Lee. Smith. Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Sage Publications, 1981.
Glesne, Corrine., and Alan. Peshkin. Becoming Qualitative Researchers : An Introduction. SAGE Publication, 1992.
Jacobs, Susie. “Agrarian Reforms.” Current Sociology 61, no. 5–6 (2013): 862–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113486660.
Kerlinger, Fred N. Foundation of Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964.
Krekshi, Laila El. “Indigenous Peoples’ Perspectives on Participation in Mining the Case of James Bay Cree First Nation in Canada,” 2009.
Mahargita, Refina, Ahmad Baikuni Perdana, and Muhammad Yusuf Syaifullah. “Comparative Analysis of Land Management Approaches for Public Development on Customary Land: Emphasizing Cooperative Land Banking (CLB) in the Minangkabau Case Study.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 24, no. 3 (2024): 307–20. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2024.V24.307-320.
Mandailing Post. “The Suspect of Mandailing Natal Riots Increased .” Mandailing Post, 2012.
Nugroho, Bambang Daru. Hukum Adat: Hak Menguasai Negara Atas Sumber Daya Alam Kehutanan Dan Perlindungan Terhadap Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Refika Aditama, 2015.
Rahayu, Derita Prapti, and Faisal Faisal. “Eksistensi Pertambangan Rakyat Pasca Pemberlakuan Perubahan Undang-Undang Tentang Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 3 (2021): 337–53. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i3.337-353.
Salam, and Abdul. “The Impact of Mining Industry towards Local Community,” 2004.
Spradley, James P.. Participant Observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1980.
Sproull, Natalie L.. Handbook of Research Methods : A Guide for Practitioners and Students in the Social Sciences. Scarecrow Press, 1988.
Suharto, dkk. Poverty and Social Function in Indonesia. Bandung: STKS Press, 2003.
Sulton, Ali. “Dampak Aktivitas Pertambangan Bahan Galian Golongan c Terhadap Kondisi Kehidupan Masyarakat Desa (Analisis Sosio-Ekonomi Dan Sosio-Ekologi Masyarakat Desa Cipinang, Kecamatan Rumpin, Kabupaten Bogor, Jawa Barat).” Institut Pertanian Bogor, 2011.
Tjoa, Marthina, Mersiana Sahureka, and Arfandy Renyaan. “The Role Of Customary Institutions In Natural Resource Management In Kailolo, Haruku Island.” Tropical Small Island Agriculture Management 1, no. 1 (2021): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.30598/tsiam.2021.1.1.19.
Yevendri, Yevendri. “The Existence and Urgency of Customary Land In West Sumatra Province.” Asian Journal of Social and Humanities 2, no. 2 (2023): 1777–83. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v2i2.184.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurhamidah Gajah, Henry Sitorus, Marlon Sihombing, Arifana Arifana, Safran Efendi Pasaribu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but it does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
