Constitutional Ethics Rooted in Customary Values: Comparative Analysis between Indonesia and Russia
), Ildar Rustamovich Begishev(2)
(1) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 66 Kendari, Kendari, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law, Kazan Innovative University, Moskow, Russian Federation
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Constitutional ethics reflect the moral dimension that guides the administration of the state based on the cultural and historical values of the nation. Every country in the global context has a root value that shapes the character of its constitution. Indonesia and Russia are interesting examples because they both place local ethics, culture, and traditions as the basis for constitutional legitimacy.
Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze and compare how customary and cultural values affect the formation and implementation of constitutional ethics in Indonesia and Russia. Through this study, it is hoped that a deeper understanding of the relationship between culture, ethics, and the constitution as the main pillars of morality in modern governance can be found.
Methods of the Research: The research method used is qualitative and comparative with normative and socio-cultural approaches. Data was obtained through literature studies of constitutional documents, legal texts, and the results of previous research. The analysis was carried out in a descriptive-comparative manner to explore the similarities and differences between the two legal systems in internalizing customary-based ethical values into constitutional principles and state practices.
Results of the Research: The findings show that both Indonesia and Russia have strong constitutional ethics rooted in the traditions of their people. Indonesia emphasizes social harmony, mutual cooperation, and social justice based on Pancasila, while Russia emphasizes the values of loyalty, national solidarity, and spirituality. Although they differ in their source of value, they show that the constitution is not just a legal document, but a reflection of the nation's moral and cultural identity that strengthens the state's legitimacy and social integrity.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v32i1.3493
Published
2026-03-24
How To Cite
@article{SASI3493,
author = {Fakhry Amin and Ildar Begishev},
title = {Constitutional Ethics Rooted in Customary Values: Comparative Analysis between Indonesia and Russia},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {32},
number = {1},
year = {2026},
keywords = {Constitutional Ethics; Customary Values; Legal Comparison.},
abstract = {Introduction: Constitutional ethics reflect the moral dimension that guides the administration of the state based on the cultural and historical values of the nation. Every country in the global context has a root value that shapes the character of its constitution. Indonesia and Russia are interesting examples because they both place local ethics, culture, and traditions as the basis for constitutional legitimacy.Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze and compare how customary and cultural values affect the formation and implementation of constitutional ethics in Indonesia and Russia. Through this study, it is hoped that a deeper understanding of the relationship between culture, ethics, and the constitution as the main pillars of morality in modern governance can be found.Methods of the Research: The research method used is qualitative and comparative with normative and socio-cultural approaches. Data was obtained through literature studies of constitutional documents, legal texts, and the results of previous research. The analysis was carried out in a descriptive-comparative manner to explore the similarities and differences between the two legal systems in internalizing customary-based ethical values into constitutional principles and state practices.Results of the Research: The findings show that both Indonesia and Russia have strong constitutional ethics rooted in the traditions of their people. Indonesia emphasizes social harmony, mutual cooperation, and social justice based on Pancasila, while Russia emphasizes the values of loyalty, national solidarity, and spirituality. Although they differ in their source of value, they show that the constitution is not just a legal document, but a reflection of the nation's moral and cultural identity that strengthens the state's legitimacy and social integrity.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {72--88} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v32i1.3493},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/3493}
}
Adnyani, Ni Ketut Sari, Made Sugi Hartono, Ni Putu Ega Parwati, and Sergio Salles. “The Constitutional Law in Contemporary Times: Comparison of India and Indonesia.” Jurnal Suara Hukum 6 (2024).
Afrianti, Pipit, and Desie Andreastuti. “Integration of Religious Values in Public Ethics in a Multicultural Society.” Journal of Religion and Social Transformation 2, no. 2 (2025). doi:10.24235/gmd8n231.
Aisahrani, Nurul, Salwa Raudhatul Nurjannah, Intan Nadia Putri, and Amit Kumar Kashyap. “The Constitutional Protection of Freedom of Artistic Expression: A Comparison between Indonesia, Iran and the United States.” Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law 2, no. 1 (2025).
Ardhana, I. Ketut, and Ni Wayan Radita Novi Puspitasari. “Adat Law, Ethics, and Human Rights in Modern Indonesia.” Religions 14, no. 4 (2023). doi:10.3390/rel14040443.
Ashri, Abdul Munif. “Divergence of Human Rights In-Terpretations: Between the In-Donesian Constitution and In-Ternational Regime Perspectives.” Journal of Interdisciplinary Law and Legal Issues 2, no. 1 (2024): 1.
Hale, Henry E. “The Value of Values for Autocrats: Traditional Morality and Putin’s 2020 Term-Limit Contravention.” Perspectives on Politics, 2025. doi:10.1017/S1537592725102132.
Iskandar, Pranoto. “Is There an Indonesian Constitutional Democracy? Welcoming The War on The Tradition of Meaning.” The Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2024. http://wwwijil.org.
Khabrieva, T. Ya. “Constitutional Reform in Russia: Searching for National Identity.” Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 90, no. 3 (2020): 273–82. doi:10.1134/S1019331620030028.
Manurung, Hendra, and Arry Bainus. “Indonesia-Russia Strategic Partnership in Southeast Asia Region.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional 17, no. 1 (2021): 77–96. doi:10.26593/jihi.v17i1.3488.77-96.
Natalia, Shaptala, Kaminska Nataliia, Kalynovskyi Bohdan, Ivanochko Iryna, and Kulyk Tetiana. “Constitutionalism As a Philosophical and Legal Category and A Socio-Political Phenomenon.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 23 (2020).
Prasetyo, Yogi. “Indonesian Integral Law Based on Pancasila.” Pancasila and Law Review 3, no. 1 (2022): 1–12. doi:10.25041/plr.v3i1.2443.
Rafiqi, Ilham Dwi. “Perbandingan Konstitusi Negara Indonesia Dan Rusia.” Widya Yuridika 5, no. 1 (2022): 1. doi:10.31328/wy.v5i1.3561.
Rudy, Rudy, Ryzal Perdana, and Rudi Wijaya. “The Recognition of Customary Rights by Indonesian Constitutional Court.” Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 10, no. 3 (2021): 308–18. doi:10.36941/AJIS-2021-0086.
Santy, Santy. “Exploring the Intersection of Pancasila and Human Rights in Indonesian Law.” Sinergi International Journal of Education 2 (2024).
Sergiienko, Larysa, Mykola Pugachov, Oleh Ihnatiuk, Nataliia Serohina, and Ruslan Panchyshyn. “Constitutional and Municipal Law: Analysing Constitutions and Their Societal Implications.” Multidisciplinary Reviews 7, no. 10 (2024). doi:10.31893/multirev.2024197.
Setyawan, VIncentius. “Pancasila Sebagai Sumber Hukum Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies 1, no. 1 (2023): 21. https://juna.nusantarajournal.com/index.php/juna.
Shaik, Jahan, Harpreet Kaur, G Vaishnav Kumar, Sayantani Ghosh, Rupesh Kumar Upadhyay, and Abhijit Aditya. “Law, Culture, And Social Norms: Understanding Customary Practices in Conflict with Constitutional RightS.” Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management 2025, no. 3 (2025): 2468–4376. https://www.jisem-journal.com/.
Suharsono, Agus. “Comparative Study of Human Rights Protection: An Analysis between Germany and Indonesia.” Indonesian Comparative Law Review 7, no. 1 (2024): 26–45. doi:10.18196/iclr.v7i1.24224.
Thontowi, Jawahir, Erna Wati, Abdul Jamil, and Nurjihad Nurjihad. “Transformation of Pancasila and the Rule of Law: A Comparative Study and Analysis of National Development Before and After Government Reformation.” SHS Web of Conferences 204 (2024): 07011. doi:10.1051/shsconf/202420407011.
Ulum, Muhammad Bahrul. “Indonesian Democracy and Political Parties After Twenty Years of Reformation: A Contextual Analysis.” Indonesia Law Review 10, no. 1 (2020): 29–44. doi:10.15742/ilrev.v10n1.577.
Vasyaev, Alexander. “Lawyers’ Disciplinary, Corporate, and Professional Liability in the EU: Applicability to the Russian Legal System.” Public Organization Review 22, no. 4 (2022): 1297–1311. doi:10.1007/s11115-021-00575-9.
Wardhani, Baiq, and Radityo Dharmaputra. “Indonesia’s Ambivalence in the Russia-Ukraine War: Balancing Equal Sovereignty Norms with a Familial Approach.” Contemporary Security Policy 45, no. 4 (2024): 627–42. doi:10.1080/13523260.2024.2397926.
Winanti, Ni Putu, and Ni Putu Widyastuti. “The Foundation of Ethical and Moral Dimensions for Indonesian Future.” Life and Death: Hournal of Eschatology 1, no. 2 (2024): 69–78. https://journal-iasssf.com/index.php/LaD.
Windari, Ratna Artha, and Yetty Komalasari Dewi. “Evaluating Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Policies and Sustainability Development Goals Achievement in Indonesia.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 13, no. 1 (2024): 1–26. doi:10.20961/yustisia.
: 14 times
Download : 2 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Constitutional Ethics Rooted in Customary Values: Comparative Analysis between Indonesia and Russia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Fakhry Amin; Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 66 Kendari, Kendari; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country |
Ildar Rustamovich Begishev; Faculty of Law, Kazan Innovative University, Moskow; Russian Federation |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Constitutional Ethics; Customary Values; Legal Comparison. |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: Constitutional ethics reflect the moral dimension that guides the administration of the state based on the cultural and historical values of the nation. Every country in the global context has a root value that shapes the character of its constitution. Indonesia and Russia are interesting examples because they both place local ethics, culture, and traditions as the basis for constitutional legitimacy.Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze and compare how customary and cultural values affect the formation and implementation of constitutional ethics in Indonesia and Russia. Through this study, it is hoped that a deeper understanding of the relationship between culture, ethics, and the constitution as the main pillars of morality in modern governance can be found.Methods of the Research: The research method used is qualitative and comparative with normative and socio-cultural approaches. Data was obtained through literature studies of constitutional documents, legal texts, and the results of previous research. The analysis was carried out in a descriptive-comparative manner to explore the similarities and differences between the two legal systems in internalizing customary-based ethical values into constitutional principles and state practices.Results of the Research: The findings show that both Indonesia and Russia have strong constitutional ethics rooted in the traditions of their people. Indonesia emphasizes social harmony, mutual cooperation, and social justice based on Pancasila, while Russia emphasizes the values of loyalty, national solidarity, and spirituality. Although they differ in their source of value, they show that the constitution is not just a legal document, but a reflection of the nation's moral and cultural identity that strengthens the state's legitimacy and social integrity. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2026-03-24 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/3493 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/sasi.v32i1.3493 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | SASI; Volume 32 Issue 1, March 2026 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
License: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2026 Fakhry Amin, Ildar Rustamovich Begishev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
