Kekuatan Mengikat Surat Penunjukan Penyedia Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah dalam Kontrak Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah di Masa Pandemi Covid-19


*Merry Tjoanda - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
CrossMark

Abstract

The process of determining the auction winner for a goods / services procurement project ends with the issuance of SPPBJ by PPK. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legally binding force of the Goods / Services Provider Appointment Letter (SPPBJ) in government procurement contracts of goods / services, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. The results showed that before the contract for the procurement of goods / services was signed by the PPK and the provision of goods / services, the SPPBJ that had been issued by the function of executing the auctioned work provided that there were no objections from other participants and the rebuttal period had ended. SPPBJ acts as a binding contract, where SPPBJ is very much needed because the contract may be canceled or transferred due to refocusing of activities and relocation of budgets due to the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic as it is today. There needs to be a more stringent regulation in the SPPBJ issuance process to deal with irregularities that may still occur, which is carried out by PPK.

Keywords

SPPBJ Binding Strength; Goods / Services Procurement Contracts; Impact of the Pandemic; covid-19

How To Cite


APA: Tjoanda, M. (2020). Kekuatan Mengikat Surat Penunjukan Penyedia Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah dalam Kontrak Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. SASI, 26(3), 403-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i3.396.
IEEE: M. Tjoanda, "Kekuatan Mengikat Surat Penunjukan Penyedia Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah dalam Kontrak Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah di Masa Pandemi Covid-19", SASI, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 403-414, Sep. 2020. Accessed on: Dec. 6, 2021. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i3.396
Harvard: Tjoanda, M., (2020). "Kekuatan Mengikat Surat Penunjukan Penyedia Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah dalam Kontrak Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah di Masa Pandemi Covid-19". SASI, Volume 26(3), pp. 403-414. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i3.396 (Accessed on: 6 December 2021)
Chicago: Tjoanda, Merry. "Kekuatan Mengikat Surat Penunjukan Penyedia Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah dalam Kontrak Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah di Masa Pandemi Covid-19." SASI 26, no. 3 (September 9, 2020): 403-414. Accessed December 6, 2021. doi:10.47268/sasi.v26i3.396
Vancouver: Tjoanda M. Kekuatan Mengikat Surat Penunjukan Penyedia Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah dalam Kontrak Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. SASI [Internet]. 2020 Sep 21 [cited 2021 Dec 6];26(3):403-414. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i3.396
MLA 8th: Tjoanda, Merry. "Kekuatan Mengikat Surat Penunjukan Penyedia Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah dalam Kontrak Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah di Masa Pandemi Covid-19." SASI, vol. 26, no. 3, 9 Sep. 2020, pp. 403-414, doi:10.47268/sasi.v26i3.396. Accessed 6 Dec. 2021.
BibTeX:
@article{SASI396,
			author = {Merry Tjoanda},
			title = {Kekuatan Mengikat Surat Penunjukan Penyedia Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah dalam Kontrak Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah di Masa Pandemi Covid-19},
			journal = {SASI},
			volume = {26},
			number = {3},
			year = {2020},
			keywords = {SPPBJ Binding Strength; Goods / Services Procurement Contracts; Impact of the Pandemic; covid-19},
			abstract = {The process of determining the auction winner for a goods / services procurement project ends with the issuance of SPPBJ by PPK. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legally binding force of the Goods / Services Provider Appointment Letter (SPPBJ) in government procurement contracts of goods / services, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. The results showed that before the contract for the procurement of goods / services was signed by the PPK and the provision of goods / services, the SPPBJ that had been issued by the function of executing the auctioned work provided that there were no objections from other participants and the rebuttal period had ended. SPPBJ acts as a binding contract, where SPPBJ is very much needed because the contract may be canceled or transferred due to refocusing of activities and relocation of budgets due to the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic as it is today. There needs to be a more stringent regulation in the SPPBJ issuance process to deal with irregularities that may still occur, which is carried out by PPK.},
					issn = {2614-2961},			pages = {403--414}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v26i3.396},
					url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/396}
		}
		
RefWorks:

Citation format: 

[1] Adityo, R. D. (2016). Efektifitas Kontrak Baku dalam Mobilitas Bisnis (Perspektif Hukum Progresif). Mahkamah, 1 (1): 111-119.

[2] Butarbutar, R. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah di Bidang Konstruksi. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas, 9 (1): 51-55.
https://doi.org/10.31479/jphl.v9i1.31

[3] Fajarini, D. P. (2019). Subkontrak Dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Mimbar Keadilan, 12 (1): 67-84.
https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v12i1.2168

[4] Listiyanto, A. (2012). Pembaharuan Regulasi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah. Rechts Vinding, 1 (1): 113-134.
https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v1i1.109

[5] Manery, B. D. (2017). Makna Dan Fungsi Itikad Baik Dalam Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi. SASI, 23 (2): 136-148.
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v23i2.101

[6] Muskibah & Hidayah, L. N. (2020). Penerapan Prinsip Kebebasan Berkontrak dalam Kontrak Standar Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah di Indonesia. Refleksi Hukum, 4 (2): 175-194, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v4.i2.p175-194.
https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v4.i2.p175-194

[7] Pane, M. D. (2017). Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah Suatu Tinjauan Yuridis Peraturan Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah. Jurnal Media Hukum, 24 (2): 174-155, DOI: 10.18196/ jmh.2017.0090.147- 155.

[8] Putra, K. D. H. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Jurist-Diction, 2 (4): 1303-1318.
https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v2i4.14493

[9] Kuahaty, S. S. (2011). Pemerintah Sebagai Subjek Hukum Perdata Dalam Kontrak Pengadaan Barang Atau Jasa. SASI, 17 (3): 53-58 , h. 53.
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v17i3.365

[10] Sanjaya, D., Siregar, R., & Windha. (2013). Analisis Yuridis Pengadaan Barang/Jasa yang Dilakukan Dinas Pendidikan Kota Tanjungbalai Ditinjau dari Peraturan Presiden Nomor 54 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. TRANSPARENCY Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 1 (2): 1-7.

[11] Situmeang, I. S. (2017). Pembatalan Surat Penunjukan Penyedia Barang dan Jasa dalam Kontrak Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah. DiH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13 (26): 217-230.
https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v0i0.1584

[12] Ramli, S. (2014). Bacaan Wajib Sertifikasi Ahli Pengadan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah, Jakarta: Visimedia.

[13] Syaifuddin, M. (2012). Hukum Kontrak (Memahami Kontrak Dalam Perspektif Filsafat, Teori, Dogmatik dan Praktik Hukum), Bandung: Mandar Maju.

[14] Simamora, Y. S. (2013). Hukum Kontrak (Kontrak Pengadaan barang dan Jasa Pemerintah di Indonesia), Surabaya: Laksbang.

[15] Sutedi, A. (2014). Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Barang/jasa dan Berbagai Permasalahannya, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

[16] Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah, Buku Informasi Membuat Surat Penunjukan Penyedia Barang/Jasa, 2016.

Full Text:

PDF
1456 times.
PDF Views: 2314 times.






Copyright (c) 2020 Merry Tjoanda

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.