Penggunaan Asas Beban Pembuktian Terbalik sebagai Penyelesaian Perkara Kesalahan yang Dilakukan Oleh Dokter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i2.426Keywords:
Error, Reversed Evidence, Legal Protection.Abstract
This study aims to identify and analyze criminal procedural law arrangements in resolving cases of wrongdoing committed by doctors; and legal protection for patients in reverse proof of the settlement of wrongdoing by doctors. The research method used is normative juridical research, the type of research is descriptive analytical. The source of legal materials is primary and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is carried out by library research on legal materials, both primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, to complement the legal materials collected, interviews are conducted with experts or resource persons selected based on the authority exercised by the relevant In this paper, analysis of legal materials is descriptive qualitative, namely identifying primary and secondary legal materials that will be carried out in analyzing problems in a series of processing stages by carrying out an inventory, systematizing, to make it easier to analyze these problems. Based on the analysis, the authors conclude several things, including: (1) the system of proof of criminal procedural law in the process of resolving a case of wrongdoing committed by a doctor still uses the usual burden of proof as stated in article 66 of the criminal procedural code ( KUHAP); (2) providing legal protection to patients under the burden of proof reversed on the settlement of wrongdoing committed by doctors can be seen using: 1. Philosophical Approach, 2. Juridical Approach, 3. Theoretical Approach, and 4. Social Approach.
Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Jurnal
[1] Dali, M. A., & Kasim, W. (2019). Aspek Hukum Informed Consent dan Perjanjian Terapeutik. Akademika, 8(2), 95-106.
https://doi.org/10.31314/akademika.v8i2.403
[2] Darmadi, A. S. M. Y. (2018). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Pidana Bersyarat. Jurnal Advokasi, 8(2), 179-191.
[3] Erdiansyah. (2016), Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Dokter Atas Kesalahan Dan Kelalaian Dalam Memberikan Pelayanan Medis Di Rumah Sakit, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2).
[4] HZ, E. D. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Dari Konten Berbahaya Dalam Media Cetak Dan Elektronik, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 1-20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/jih.v3i1.1036.
[5] Irwanda, E. A., & Din, M. (2020). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Perkara Zina dalam Perspektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana dan Qanun Hukum Acara Jinayat. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana, 4(3), 556-566.
[6] Maggalatung, A. S. (2014). Hubungan Antara Fakta Norma, Moral, Dan Doktrin Hukum Dalam Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 2(2).
https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i2.1462
[7] Nakamnanu, M. J. (2016), Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Informasi Atau Dokumen Elektronik Dalam Peradilan Perkara Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Hukum.
[8] Ratnasari, D., Lasmadi, S., & Sudarti, E. (2021). Kedudukan Hukum Deponeering dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 2(1), 17-29.
https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v2i1.12053
[9] Sengi, E. (2019). Konsep Culpa Dalam Perkara Pidana Suatu Analisis Perbandingan Putusan Nomor 18/Pid. B/2017/PN. Tobelo. Era Hukum-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 17(2).
https://doi.org/10.24912/erahukum.v17i2.5993
[10] Tambunan, L. (2014), Implementasi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Korban Kekerasan Psikis Dalam Rumah Tangga, Jurnal Hukum, 1-24, http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/7172/.
Buku
[11] Ali, A. (2017). Menguak Tabir Hukum: Ed. 2, Jakarta: Kencana. 2017.
[12] Ilyas, A., & Mustamin, M. (2012). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana: Memahami Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana sebagai Syarat Pemidanaan: Disertai Teori-Teori Pengantar dan Beberapa Komentar. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education & PuKAP-Indonesia.
[13] Indrati, Maria Farida S. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Proses Dan Teknik Pembentukannya, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
[14] Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: Kencana. 2008.
[15] Mussakir. (2013) Putusan Hakim Yang Diskriminatif Dalam Perkara Pidana Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologi Hukum Dan Dan Psikologi Hukum. Yogjakarta: Mahakarya Rangkang Offset.
[16] Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UI Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Randika Fitrah Darmawan, Slamet Sampurno Soewondo, Sabir Alwi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but it does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
How to Cite
