Covid-19 sebagai Bentuk Overmacht dan Akibat Hukumnya Terhadap Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kredit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.447Keywords:
Covid-19, Overmacht, Credit AgreementAbstract
The study is aimed at identifying and analyzing covid-19 as a form of relative overmacht and as a result of the overmacht law in the credit agreement and the policy of ending the credit agreement as a result of the covid-19 pandemic. The study method used in this study was normatif juridical, a doctrinal law study method by examining and studying the regulations of legislation that served asa basis for then analyzing the issues discussed. The study is analytical by using primary and secondary legal materials through the study of related documents and literature. The analysis used in the study is qualitative analysis to address the issues discussed. According to research, the covid-19 is a non-natural disaster that can therefore be categorized as overmacht measurement. As a form of overmacht relative, the result of the law of the spread of covid-19 as the overmacht relative to the credit agreement is that the debtor still has to fulfill his obligations to the debtor after the covid-19 is over. In its implementation based on POJK 11/2020, the debtor is given credit relief through restructuring in accordance with the form of restructuring issued by the bank in the form of lowering interest rates, extension of term, reduction of principal arrears, reduction of interest arrears and other forms according to verification and analysis of the bank on affected debtors covid-19.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
[1] Aminah. (2020). Pengaruh Pandemi Covid 19 Pada Pelaksanaan Perjanjian, Diponegoro Private Law Review, 7 (1), 650-656. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/dplr/article/view/8172.
[2] Baneftar, Frengky. (2020). Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan dengan Jaminan Sertifikat Tanah Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 studi ada Bank Papua Cabang Biak. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren, 5 (1), 19-44. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v5i1.25.
https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v5i1.25
[3] Hernawan, Ari. (2012). Keseimbangan Hak dan Kewajiban Pekerja dan Pengusaha Dalam Mogok Kerja. Mimbar Hukum, 24 (3), 418-430. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16119.
[4] Hetharie, Yosia. (2019). Perjanjian Nominee Sebagai Sarana Penguasaan Hak Milik Atas Tanah Oleh Warga Negara Asing (WNA) Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. SASI, 25 (1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i1.147.
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i1.147
[5] Hetharie, Yosia. (2020). Default in Sea Transportation Agrement. Law Research Review Quarterly, 6 (2), 181-184. https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v6i2.37900.
https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v6i2.37900
[6] Kunarso, K., & Sumaryanto, A.D. (2020). Eksistensi Perjanjian Ditengah Pandemi Covid-19. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.423.
https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.423
[7] Limpele, Mariana Mogot. (2017). Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Hak Milik Atas Tanah dan Bangunan Pada Bank Tabungan Negara Cabang Manado Menurut UU Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan, Lex Crime, 6 (2),44-49.
[8] Nuraini, Hanifah., Dauri., A, Thio Haikal., Andreas, Ricco. (2020). Paradigma Interpretatif Konsep Penyalahgunaan Keadaan (Misbruik van Omstandigheiden) Pada Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan, Jurnal Refleksi Hukum, 4 (2), 259-280. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v4.i2.p259-280.
https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v4.i2.p259-280
[9] Rothan, Hussin A., Byrareddy, Siddappa N. (2020). The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. Journal of Autoimmunity, 109 (May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433
[10] Taun, T., & Nugraha, A. (2020). Penerapan Hukum dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja dan Kebijakan Bank Terhadap Debitur yang Terdampak Pandemi Covid-19. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.422.
https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.422
[11] Tektona, R.I., & Risma, Q. (2020). Penerapan Prinsip Character Dalam Pelaksanaan Prinsip Kehati-hatian pada Analisis Pemberian Kredit Usaha Mikro. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.420.
https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.420
[12] Hermansyah, (2008). Hukum Perbankan Nasional Indonesia, Bandung: Kencana Prenada Media.
[13] Irianto, Sulistyowati. (2009). Praktik Hukum: Perspektif Sosiolegal, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.
[14] Panggabean, Henry Pandapotan. (2008). Peranan Mahkamah Agung Melalui Putusan-Putusan Hukum Perikatan, Bandung: Alumni.
[15] Sunandar, Taryana. (2004). Prinsip Prinsip Unidroit Sebagai Sumber Hukum Kontrak Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
[16] Sutarno, (2004). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perbankan Pada Bank, Bandung: Alfabeta
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Merry Tjoanda, Yosia Hetharie, Marselo Valentino Geovani Pariela, Ronald Fadly Sopamena
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but it does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
How to Cite
