Intergrated Criminal Policy: Peran Kementerian Agama Dalam Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v27i3.506
Published
2021-10-07
How To Cite
@article{SASI506, author = {Jusafri Jusafri}, title = {Intergrated Criminal Policy: Peran Kementerian Agama Dalam Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi}, journal = {SASI}, volume = {27}, number = {3}, year = {2021}, keywords = {Criminal Policy; Ministry of Religion; Corruption}, abstract = {This research aims to determine the relationship between criminal law policies as an effort to prevent corruption and to analyze how the Ministry of Religion program should be in preparing programs for preventing corruption in relation to the Integrated Criminal Policy. So that the writing will discuss the relationship between criminal law policies as an effort to prevent corruption and an integrated criminal law policy or Integrated Criminal Policy can increase the role of the Ministry of Religion in preventing corruption. The approach used in this research is the statute approach to examine regulations related to the Ministry of Religion and the prevention of corruption, the conceptual approach, which is to move from the views and doctrines in criminal law related to criminal law policies. integrated (integrated criminal policy). Prevention of corruption which is explicitly stated in UNCAC, the KPK Law and the United Nations Convention on crime prevention is an effort outside of criminal law (non-penal) which is an inseparable part of criminal law policy. The social policy carried out by the Ministry of Religion in preventing corruption is an effort outside of criminal law (non-penal) and can balance the eradication of corruption through criminal law (penal) carried out by law enforcers. This kind of social policy is a manifestation of an integrated criminal law policy that can be carried out by the government.}, issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {323--334} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v27i3.506}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/506} }
Jurnal
[1] Bhakti, S. A. E., & Djauhari, D. (2017). Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Peran Serta Masyarakat. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 12(2), 307-318.
[2] Hakim, L. (2012). Model Integrasi Pendidikan Anti Korupsi dalam Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam. Ta'lim: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 10(2), 141-156.
[3] Hattu, J. (2014). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Anak. Sasi, 20(2), 47-52.
[4] Handoyo, D. P. S. (2018). Pelaksanaan Pidana Bersyarat Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Pakuan Law Review, 4(1). 24-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v4i1.
https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v4i1
[5] Karsenda, K. A., & Salain, M. S. P. D. (2016). Upaya Pencegahan (Preventif) Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dikaji Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Kertha Semaya, 4(1), 1-5.
[6] Kenedi, J. (2017). Kebijakan Kriminal (Criminal Policy) Dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia: Upaya Mensejahterakan Masyarakat (Social Welfare). Al-Imarah: Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik Islam, 2(1). 15-26.
[7] Rasul, S. (2009). Penerapan Good Governance Di Indonesia dalam Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Mimbar Hukum, 21(3), 538-553.
[8] Sirin, K. (2013). Penerapan Hukuman Mati Bagi Pelaku Kejahatan Korupsi di Indonesia: Analisis Pendekatan Teori Maqã shid Al-syarã ah. Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam IAIN Mataram, 12(1), 71-92.
[9] Syamsudin. M. (2007). Operasionalisasi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
[10] Saifulloh, P. P. (2017). Peran Perguruan Tinggi dalam Menumbuhkan Budaya Anti Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 47(4), 459-476.
https://doi.org/10.21143/.vol47.no4.1591
[11] Suherry, S. (2017). Politik Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 7(1), 46-53.
https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v7i1.417
[12] Wutsqah. U. (2019). Pendidikan Anti Korupsi Dalam Kurikulum Pendidikan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan MH Thamrin. 3(2). 30-39.
https://doi.org/10.37012/jipmht.v3i2.103
[13] Yanto, O. (2017). Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Keadaan Tertentu (Death Penalty To Corruptors in A Certain Condition). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 24(1), 49-56.
[14] Yandi, R. (2021). Peran Agama Dalam Pembentukan Perilaku Anti-Korupsi. SALIHA: Jurnal Pendidikan & Agama Islam, 4(1), 91-107.
Buku
[15] Atmasasmita, R. (2010). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana.
[16] Arif, B. N. (2010). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
[17] Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
[18] Ruslan, M. (2017). Politik Antikorupsi Di Indonesia: Gradualitas dan Ambiguitas. Depok: LP3ES.
Online/World Wide Web, dll
[19] Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2020). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Instansi. Retrieved from https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-instansi.
[20] Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2019). Kasus Pertama. Retrieved from https://www.kpk.go.id/id/berita/berita-kpk/1329-kasus-pertama.
[21] pandemi/pan·de·mi/ /pandémi/ n wabah yang berjangkit serempak di mana-mana, meliputi daerah geografi yang luas.
[22] Transparency International. (2020). Corruption perceptions index 2020, Transparency International.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jusafri SH MH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.