Problematika Hak Atas Kewarganegaraan Kehormatan Honorary Citizenship Di Indonesia: Implementasi Dan Dampaknya

Deden Rafi Syafiq Rabbani

doi:10.47268/sasi.v27i3.517

Problematika Hak Atas Kewarganegaraan Kehormatan Honorary Citizenship Di Indonesia: Implementasi Dan Dampaknya

Deden Rafi Syafiq Rabbani⁽¹⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

The crucial problem in the context of honorary citizenship is related to the process of granting and the mechanism for obtaining special honorary citizenship status. This specificity has an impact on various important elements in regulating the citizenship of a country, both on the conditions, procedures for obtaining or granting mechanisms, to the enjoyment of the right to honorary citizenship. In Indonesia, through the presence of Law Number 12 of 2006 concerning the Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, the right to honorary citizenship is part of what is regulated in it. The aims of this paper include: First, to provide an analysis of the conception of honorary citizenship in citizenship law. Second, provide an analysis related to the implementation and impact of the regulation of honorary citizenship in Indonesia. Through a socio-legal approach and qualitative normative research accompanied by a comparative approach in the form of a micro comparison by looking at the substance and legal rules in detail, the results of the research are as follows: First, the concept of honorary citizenship can be seen through the dimensions of a country's citizenship regime based on legal arrangements, interests state, human rights factors and in state development, and the essential political values of a country. Second, with regard to the implementation and impact of the regulation of honorary citizenship in Indonesia, it affects 3 (three) conditions, namely (1) the conditions for obtaining honorary citizenship. (2) The authority to grant honorary citizenship. (3) In the context of losing honorary citizenship status status.

Keywords

Problematic; Honorary Citizenship; Indonesia; Implementation; Impacts.

DOI

10.47268/sasi.v27i3.517

Published

2021-10-07

How To Cite

APA: Rabbani, D.S. (2021). Problematika Hak Atas Kewarganegaraan Kehormatan Honorary Citizenship Di Indonesia: Implementasi Dan Dampaknya. SASI, 27(3), 288 - 302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i3.517.

BibTeX:

@article{SASI517,
		author = {Deden Rafi Rabbani},
		title = {Problematika Hak Atas Kewarganegaraan Kehormatan Honorary Citizenship Di Indonesia: Implementasi Dan Dampaknya},
		journal = {SASI},
		volume = {27},
		number = {3},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Problematic; Honorary Citizenship; Indonesia; Implementation; Impacts.},
		abstract = {The crucial problem in the context of honorary citizenship is related to the process of granting and the mechanism for obtaining special honorary citizenship status. This specificity has an impact on various important elements in regulating the citizenship of a country, both on the conditions, procedures for obtaining or granting mechanisms, to the enjoyment of the right to honorary citizenship. In Indonesia, through the presence of Law Number 12 of 2006 concerning the Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, the right to honorary citizenship is part of what is regulated in it. The aims of this paper include: First, to provide an analysis of the conception of honorary citizenship in citizenship law. Second, provide an analysis related to the implementation and impact of the regulation of honorary citizenship in Indonesia. Through a socio-legal approach and qualitative normative research accompanied by a comparative approach in the form of a micro comparison by looking at the substance and legal rules in detail, the results of the research are as follows: First, the concept of honorary citizenship can be seen through the dimensions of a country's citizenship regime based on legal arrangements, interests state, human rights factors and in state development, and the essential political values of a country. Second, with regard to the implementation and impact of the regulation of honorary citizenship in Indonesia, it affects 3 (three) conditions, namely (1) the conditions for obtaining honorary citizenship. (2) The authority to grant honorary citizenship. (3) In the context of losing honorary citizenship status status.},
				issn = {2614-2961},		pages = {288--302}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v27i3.517},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/517}
		}

Citation format: Download Citation:

Jurnal

[1] Astuti, A. D., & Putranti, I. R. (2018). Implikasi Kebijakan Indonesia dalam Menangani Kasus Pencemaran Lingkungan oleh PT. Freeport terhadap Keamanan Manusia di Mimika Papua. Journal of International Relations, 4(3), 547-555.

[2] Bosniak, L. (1999). Citizenship Denationalized. Ind. J. Global Legal Stud, 7(2), 447-509.

[3] Bassel, L., Monforte, P., Bartram, D., & Khan, K. (2021). Naturalization Policies, Citizenship Regimes, and The Regulation of Belonging in Anxious Societies. Ethnicities, 21(2), 259-270.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796820963959

[4] Dewansyah, B. (2015). Perkembangan Politik Hukum dan Kebutuhan Hukum Keimigrasian Indonesia: Menjawab Sebagian, Melupakan Selebihnya. Hasanuddin Law Review, 1(2), 140-162. DOI:10.20956/halrev.v1n2.88.
https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1n2.88

[5] Jones, E., & Gaventa, J. (2002). Concepts of citizenship: a review. IDS development bibliography 19. England: Institute of Development Studies, 1, 2016.

[6] Joppke, C. (2019). The instrumental turn of citizenship. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(6), 858-878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1440484.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1440484

[7] Khan, K., & Blackledge, A. (2015). 'They Look Into Our Lips': Negotiation of The Citizenship Ceremony as Authoritative Discourse. Journal of Language and Politics, 14(3), 382-405. DOI:10.1075/jlp.14.3.04kha.
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.3.04kha

[8] Lenard, P. T. (2020). Constraining Denaturalization. Political Studies, 11, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720964666.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720964666

[9] McDougal, M. S., Lasswell, H. D., & Chen, L. C. (1973). Nationality and Human Rights: The Protection of The Individual in External Arenas. The Yale Law Journal , 83, 901-93.
https://doi.org/10.2307/795378

[10] Mindus, P. (2014). Dimensions of citizenship. German Law Journal, 15(5), 735-749. DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200019118.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200019118

[11] Rubenstein, K., & Adler, D. (1999). International citizenship: The future of Nationality in a Globalized World. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 7(2), 519-548.

[12] Reichel, D., & Perchinig, B. (2014). Reflections on the value of citizenship-explaining naturalisation practices. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 44(1), 32-45. DOI:10.15203/ozp.282.vol44iss1.
https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.282.vol44iss1

[13] Turner, B. (2017). Contemporary citizenship: Four Types. Journal of Citizenship and Globalisation Studies, 1(1): 10-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jcgs-2017-0002.
https://doi.org/10.1515/jcgs-2017-0002

[14] Van Der Ree, G. (2011). Citizenship'from Above'? The Case of Chile, 1964-2010. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 90, 23-38. DOI: 10.2307/23047818.
https://doi.org/10.18352/erlacs.9249

Buku

[15] Ali, M., & Elvany, A. I. (2014). Hukum Pidana Lingkungan: Sistem Pemidanaan Berbasis Konservasi Lingkungan Hidup. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

[16] Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (Eds.). (2005). Theory and method in socio-legal research. Oxford and Portland Orego: Bloomsbury Publishing.

[17] Bellamy, R. (2008). Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192802538.001.0001

[18] Bosniak, L. (2008). The Citizen and The Alien. United Kingdom: Princeton University Press.

[19] Balan, M., Montambeault, F. The Limits Of Transnationa L Law Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization And Judicial Dialogue In The European Union. (2020). USA:University of Notre Dame Press.

[20] Davidson, A., & Weekley, K. (Eds.). (1999). Globalization and Citizenship in the Asia-Pacific. New York: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377080

[21] Dworkin, R. (2013). Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvad University Press.

[22] DeGooyer, S., Hunt, A., Maxwell, L., & Moyn, S. (2018). The Right To Have Rights. London: Verso Books.

[23] Harijanti, S. D., Prasetianingsih, R., & Dewansyah, B. (2007). Politik Hukum Kewarganegaraan Indonesia. FH Unpad.

[24] Lettevall, R., & Klockar Linder, M. (2008). The idea of kosmopolis: History, Philosophy and Politics of World Citizenship. Swedia: Södertörns högskola.

[25] Lambert, H., & Goodwin-Gill, G. S. (Eds.). (2010). The Limits of Transnational Law: Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in The European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750403

[26] Lukito, R. (2016). Perbandingan Hukum: Perdebatan Teori dan Metode. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

[27] O'byrne, D. J. (2004). The Dimensions of Global Citizenship: Political Identity Beyond The Nation-State. London: Frank Cass.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203009321

[28] Pemberton, J. (2008). Sovereignty: Interpretations. New York: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230581944

[29] Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

[30] Taylor, L. (1998). Citizenship, Participation and Democracy: Changing Dynamics in Chile and Argentina. London: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376090

[31] Urusal, Vogel., Moran, M. (1991). The Frontries Citizenship. London: MacMillan.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21405-1

Online/World Wide Web, Tesisi, Disertasi, dll

[32] Echeverría, G. (2016). Report on citizenship law: Chile. EUDO Citizenship Observatory, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies in collaboration with Edinburgh University Law School.

[33] Iija, V. I. (2012). An Analysis of The Concept of Citizenship: Legal, Political and Social Dimensions. Helsingin Tesis: Yliopisto University of Helsinki).

[34] J. Solehati. (2019). Negara Mana Yang Punya Paling Banyak Imigran?. https://theconversation.com/negara-mana-yang-punya-paling-banyakimigran-114013.

[35] Kementerian Pemuda Dan Olahraga Republik Indonesia. (2020). 4 Pemain Naturalisasi Disetujui Komisi III DPR RI, Menpora RI: Kita Harap Mereka Bisa Jadi Penguat Untuk Timnas. https://www.kemenpora.go.id/detail/123/4-pemain-naturalisasi-disetujui-komisi-iii-dpr-ri-menpora-ri-kita-harap-mereka-bisa-jadi-penguat-untuk-timnas.

[36] Popovic M., Pesic, S. (2015). Honorary Citizenships - Awarded to Whom and How?. Montenegro: Centre for Civic Education (CCE).

[37] U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Office of Policy and Strategy. (2004). "Citizenship In The United States". U.S Immigration Report Series.