Analysis of Neglected Justice in Land Disputes in Ambon District Court

Ronald Saija

doi:10.47268/sasi.v28i1.727

Analysis of Neglected Justice in Land Disputes in Ambon District Court

Ronald Saija⁽¹⁾

(1) Faculty of Law Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: The main task of a court judge is to receive, examine and adjudicate and settle every case that is brought to him. Judges may not refuse to examine and adjudicate cases submitted on the pretext that the law does not exist or is unclear, but is obligated to examine and try them. The study of this decision is to test whether the decision of the panel of judges in the court of first instance reflects a substantively fair decision.

Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to criticize the legal considerations of judges on land disputes objectively.

Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research with a qualitative analytical descriptive nature, by examining legal materials, both primary legal materials and secondary legal materials through literature studies and other related literature.

Results of the Research: The analysis used in this study is a qualitative analysis to answer the problems studied. The results of the research and discussion stated that the judge's decision in the District Court Decision Number 242/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Amb was wrong and neglected to provide legal considerations as legal objectives, namely aspects of justice, aspects of expediency and aspects of legal certainty. In these aspects, the judge was wrong and wrong in considering the ownership of a plot of land with an area of 267 M2 with a Certificate of Ownership in the name of the Defendant, namely Hana Marthina Leuhery Number 1739/desa rumah three, 15-05-2011, Letter of Measurement dated 5 May 2011 according to PRONA from the national land agency, so that aspects of justice, aspects of usefulness and aspects of legal certainty are neglected.

Keywords

Justice; Judge's Decision; Fair Decision

DOI

10.47268/sasi.v28i1.727

Published

2022-03-31

How To Cite

APA: Saija, R. (2022). Analysis of Neglected Justice in Land Disputes in Ambon District Court. SASI, 28(1), 34-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i1.727.

IEEE: R. Saija, "Analysis of Neglected Justice in Land Disputes in Ambon District Court", SASI, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 34-42, Mar. 2022. Accessed on: Apr. 28, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i1.727

Harvard: Saija, R., (2022). "Analysis of Neglected Justice in Land Disputes in Ambon District Court". SASI, Volume 28(1), pp. 34-42. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i1.727 (Accessed on: 28 April 2025)

Chicago: Saija, Ronald. "Analysis of Neglected Justice in Land Disputes in Ambon District Court." SASI 28, no. 1 (March 31, 2022): 34-42. Accessed April 28, 2025. doi:10.47268/sasi.v28i1.727

Vancouver: Saija R. Analysis of Neglected Justice in Land Disputes in Ambon District Court. SASI [Internet]. 2022 Mar 31 [cited 2025 Apr 28];28(1):34-42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i1.727

MLA 8th: Saija, Ronald. "Analysis of Neglected Justice in Land Disputes in Ambon District Court." SASI, vol. 28, no. 1, 31 Mar. 2022, pp. 34-42, doi:10.47268/sasi.v28i1.727. Accessed 28 Apr. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{SASI727,
		author = {Ronald Saija},
		title = {Analysis of Neglected Justice in Land Disputes in Ambon District Court},
		journal = {SASI},
		volume = {28},
		number = {1},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Justice; Judge's Decision; Fair Decision},
		abstract = {Introduction: The main task of a court judge is to receive, examine and adjudicate and settle every case that is brought to him. Judges may not refuse to examine and adjudicate cases submitted on the pretext that the law does not exist or is unclear, but is obligated to examine and try them. The study of this decision is to test whether the decision of the panel of judges in the court of first instance reflects a substantively fair decision.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to criticize the legal considerations of judges on land disputes objectively.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research with a qualitative analytical descriptive nature, by examining legal materials, both primary legal materials and secondary legal materials through literature studies and other related literature.Results of the Research: The analysis used in this study is a qualitative analysis to answer the problems studied. The results of the research and discussion stated that the judge's decision in the District Court Decision Number 242/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Amb was wrong and neglected to provide legal considerations as legal objectives, namely aspects of justice, aspects of expediency and aspects of legal certainty. In these aspects, the judge was wrong and wrong in considering the ownership of a plot of land with an area of 267 M2 with a Certificate of Ownership in the name of the Defendant, namely Hana Marthina Leuhery Number 1739/desa rumah three, 15-05-2011, Letter of Measurement dated 5 May 2011 according to PRONA from the national land agency, so that aspects of justice, aspects of usefulness and aspects of legal certainty are neglected.},
				issn = {2614-2961},		pages = {34--42}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v28i1.727},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/727}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Journal Article

A, Koesrin Nawawie. "Analisis Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim Dalam Perkara Perdata Tentang Wanprestasi Perjanjian Pemberian Imbalan Jasa." Jurnal Varia Hukum 31, no. 40 (2019): 1757-67.

Komisi Yudisial. "Mendorong Terwujudnya Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Merdeka." Buletin Komisi Yudisial 1, no. 5 (2007).

Nadapdap, Binoto. "Mendambakan Putusan Hakim Yang Berwibawa." Jurnal Keadilan 3, no. 2 (2003): 12-19.

Syamsudin, M. "Rekonstruksi Perilaku Etik Hakim Dalam Menangani Perkara Berbasis Hukum Progresif." Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 8, no. Edisi Khusus (2011): 127-45.
https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.1.11

Wantu, Fence M. "Kendala Hakim Dalam Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, Dan Kemanfaatan Di Peradilan Perdata." Mimbar Hukum 25, no. 2 (2013): 205-18.
https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.121

Book

Algra, N E, and K Van Duyvendijk. Mula Hukum: Beberapa Bab Mengenai Hukum Dan Ilmu Hukum Untuk Pendidikan Hukum Dalam Pngantar Ilmu Hukum. Translated by J C T Simorangkir. Jakarta: Bina Cipta, 1983.

Dimyati, Khudzaifah. Teorisasi Hukum Studi Tentang Perkembangan Pemikiran Hukum Di Indonesia 1945-1990. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press, 2004.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1998.

---. Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2010.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Rahardjo, Satjipto, and Riduan Syahrani. Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1999.

Rifai, Ahmad. Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.

Wignyosoebroto, Soetandyo. Hukum Paradigma, Metode Dan Dinamika Masalahnya, Elsam Dan Huma. Jakarta: Elsam dan Huma, 2002.

Thesis, Web Page, and Others

Komisi Hukum Nasional Republik Indonesia. "Laporan Akhir: Standar Disiplin Profesi Tahun 2003." Jakarta, 2004.

Wantu, Fence M. "Peranan Hakim Dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, Dan Kemanfaatan, Di Peradilan Perdata." Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.121

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 866 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 503 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Analysis of Neglected Justice in Land Disputes in Ambon District Court

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Ronald Saija; Faculty of Law Pattimura University, Ambon; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Justice; Judge's Decision; Fair Decision

4.	Description	Abstract	Introduction: The main task of a court judge is to receive, examine and adjudicate and settle every case that is brought to him. Judges may not refuse to examine and adjudicate cases submitted on the pretext that the law does not exist or is unclear, but is obligated to examine and try them. The study of this decision is to test whether the decision of the panel of judges in the court of first instance reflects a substantively fair decision.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to criticize the legal considerations of judges on land disputes objectively.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical research with a qualitative analytical descriptive nature, by examining legal materials, both primary legal materials and secondary legal materials through literature studies and other related literature.Results of the Research: The analysis used in this study is a qualitative analysis to answer the problems studied. The results of the research and discussion stated that the judge's decision in the District Court Decision Number 242/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Amb was wrong and neglected to provide legal considerations as legal objectives, namely aspects of justice, aspects of expediency and aspects of legal certainty. In these aspects, the judge was wrong and wrong in considering the ownership of a plot of land with an area of 267 M2 with a Certificate of Ownership in the name of the Defendant, namely Hana Marthina Leuhery Number 1739/desa rumah three, 15-05-2011, Letter of Measurement dated 5 May 2011 according to PRONA from the national land agency, so that aspects of justice, aspects of usefulness and aspects of legal certainty are neglected.

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)	Ronald Saija, Pattimura University, Faculty of Law

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2022-03-31

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/727

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/sasi.v28i1.727

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	SASI; Volume 28 Issue 1, March 2022

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files	Untitled (40KB) Untitled (40KB)

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) License: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.