Implications of Correspondence Inference Attribution Theory & Behavioral Jurisprudence Theory: Judge's Conciderations on Conscience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i1.745Keywords:
Judge's Consideration, Conscience, Mitigating Circumstances, Agravating Circumstances, JusticeAbstract
Introduction: This article analyzes the implications of the attribution correspondence inference theory and whether the urge of conscience as affect in the Defendant is the reason for the abolition of the sentence? also behavioral jurisprudence theory on judges' considerations, where it's often a discourse in Indonesia. It is necessary to explore the human values contained in Defendant.
Purposes of the Research: The objectives of the research are: First, to provide an analysis of how the theory of attribution correspondence inference to the judge's considerations in determining the circumstances that form the basis of sentencing and knowing whether the urge of conscience as affect in the Defendant is the reason for the abolition of the crime? Second, providing an analysis related to the urgency of behavioral jurisprudence theory in creating fair decisions based on the conscience of the judge.
Methods of the Research: The normative legal research method uses a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and comparisons with different legal system which are based on library research in collecting research legal materials.
Results of the Research: The results are: First, the attribution correspondence inference theory can be used as consideration for judges’ considerations in determining to mitigate and aggravating circumstances in Indonesia and with a study of criminal law and the theory that the urge of conscience as affect the defendant can be used as a consideration of mitigating circumstances for the defendant, as well as conditional punishment. Second, the behavioral jurisprudence theory approach has urgency in understanding the behavior of a person doing an act or the judge in making a fair decision.
Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Journal Article
Hananta, Dwi. "Pertimbangan Keadaan-Keadaan Meringankan dan Memberatkan dalam Penjatuhan Pidana." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 7, no. 1 (2018): 87-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.1.2018.87-108.
https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.1.2018.87-108
Khalid, Afif. "Penafsiran Hukum Oleh Hakim dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia." Al' Adl: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 11 (2014): 9-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v6i11.196.
Kusuma, Jauhari D. "Tinjauan dan Pedoman Pemidanaan dalam Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia." Jurnal Muhakkamah 1, no. 2 (2016): 94-109.
Martadinata, Muhammad Randhy and Faisal Ahmadi. "Asas Keadilan Hukuman Putusan Peradilan." Jurnal Wasatiyah: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 2 (2020): 12-23.
Nurhardianto, Fajar. "Sistem Hukum dan Posisi Hukum Indonesia." Jurnal TAPIS 11, no. 1 (2015): 34-45. https://doi.org/10.24042/tps.v11i1.840.
https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v11i22.2231
Peonasu, Cosmin. "Mitigating and Aggravating Circumstances: Their Impact on Judicial Individualization of Punishment." Journal of Danubian Studies and Research 5, no. 1 (2015): 147-159.
Rooij, Benjamin Van. "Behavioral Jurisprudence: The Quest for Knowledge About the Ex-ante Function of Law and Behavior." Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 22, no. 1 (2020): 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrls/jlz016.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrls/jlz016
Tahir, Budayawan. "Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Menurut Hukum Pidana Tentang Daya Paksa (Overmacht)." Spirit Pro Patria 4, no. 2 (2018): 115-124. https://doi.org/10.29138/spirit%20pro%20patria.v4i2.672.
Vujošević, Marijana. "The Judge in the Miror: Kant on Conscience." Kantian Review 19, no. 3 (2014): 449-474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415414000181.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415414000181
Book
Efendi, Jonaedi, and Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Depok: Prenadamedia Group. 2018.
Rifai, Achmad. Menggapai Keadilan Dengan Hukum Progresif (Sebuah Upaya Menyempurnakan Putusan Hakim Pada Keadilan). Makassar: Nas Media Pustaka, 2020.
Rifai, Achmad. Kesalahan Hakim dalam Penerapan Hukum Pada Putusan Menciderai Keadilan Masyarakat. Makassar: Nas Media Pustaka, 2020.
Santoso, Agus. Hukum, Moral & Keadilan: Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2015.
Syamsudin, M. and Salman Luthan. Mahir Menulis Studi Kasus Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2018.
Thesis, Web Page, and Others
Atpasila, Muh Nur Arisakti. "Perbandingan Delik Pidana Menurut Aliran Monistis, Dualistis, dan Mazhab Fikih." L.L.B. Thesis, UIN Alauddin Makassar, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i2.20571
Iskandar, Denny. "Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Bebas Murni (Vrijs Praacht) Atas Dugaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 51/Pid.Sus.K/2013/PN. Mdn." L.L.B. Thesis, Medan Area University, 2014.
Reform, Institute for Criminal Justice (ICJR), Indonesia Judicial Research Society (IJRS), Community Legal Assistance Institutions, and Judicial Independence Study and Advocacy Institution. "Ganja Untuk Kesehatan Bukan Kejahatan: Amicus Curiae untuk Majelis Hakim dalam Perkara No. 83/Pid. Sus/2020/PN. Kpg atas nama Terdakwa Reyndhart Rossy N. Siahaan di PN Kupang." Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR), January 17, 2020. https://icjr.or.id/ganja-untuk-kesehatan-bukan-kejahatan-amicus-curiae-untuk-perkara-reyndhart-rossy-n-siahaan-di-pn-kupang/.
Siregar, Rizki Dwi Wira. "Peranan Kepolisian dalam Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Kedelakaan Lalu Lintas di Wilayah Polsek Deli Tua." L.L.B. Thesis, Medan Area University, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v1i2.197
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Cindy Debora Sinaga, Somawijaya Somawijaya, Agus Takariawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Terms:
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.
2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
4. Authors have the right to self-archive the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
License Terms: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but it does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
How to Cite
