Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama

Mei Indah Ngilyaubun; Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu; Jacob Hattu

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102

Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama

Mei Indah Ngilyaubun⁽¹⁾, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu⁽²⁾, Jacob Hattu⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: The current crimes encountered are crimes committed jointly or with participation (deelneming).

Purposes of the Research: The purpose of the study is to analyze and discuss how the qualifications of each actor in the crime of destroying other people's property are carried out together and to analyze and discuss how the form of accountability of the perpetrators of the criminal act of destroying other people's property is carried out together.

Methods of the Research: This method of research in writing uses a type of normative juridical research that examines positive legal provisions, legal principles, and legal doctrines, using approaches: statute approach and conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials through literature studies and legal material analysis techniques in this study uses qualitative analysis techniques.

Results of the Research: Based on the results of the research, the qualifications of each defendant are not the same, namely the defendant Helmi Untarola who has acted as an advocate (uitlokker) as well as a perpetrator (pleger) in the crime. Then there were 3 (three) other defendants, namely the defendant Ayub Marshel Balubun, the defendant Frangky Wakim, and the defendant Marten Wakim who had followed the advice of the defendant Helmi Untarola. Defendant I Helmy Untarola Defendant II Ayub Marshel Balubun, Defendant III Franky Wakim, and Defendant IV Marten Wakim were proven legally to have committed a criminal act of "Damaging other people's property together and based on the Dobo District Court Decision Number 32/Pid.B/2020/ PN. Dobo the defendants were sentenced to 5 months and paid court fees of Rp. 2000 (two thousand rupiah) each.

Keywords

Qualification; Criminal Acts; Destruction of Other People's Property.

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102

Published

2022-06-30

How To Cite

APA: Ngilyaubun, M.I., Titahelu, J.A., & Hattu, J. (2022). Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(4), 416 – 427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102.

IEEE: M.I. Ngilyaubun, J.A. Titahelu, and J. Hattu, "Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 416 – 427, Jun. 2022. Accessed on: May. 2, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102

Harvard: Ngilyaubun, M.I., Titahelu, J.A., and Hattu, J., (2022). "Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2(4), pp. 416 – 427. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102 (Accessed on: 2 May 2024)

Chicago: Ngilyaubun, Mei Indah, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, and Jacob Hattu. "Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 4 (June 30, 2022): 416 – 427. Accessed May 2, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102

Vancouver: Ngilyaubun MI, Titahelu JA, Hattu J. Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Jun 30 [cited 2024 May 2];2(4):416 – 427. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102

MLA 8th: Ngilyaubun, Mei Indah, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, and Jacob Hattu. "Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 2, no. 4, 30 Jun. 2022, pp. 416 – 427, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102. Accessed 2 May. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI1102,
		author = {Mei Ngilyaubun and Juanrico Titahelu and Jacob Hattu},
		title = {Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {2},
		number = {4},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Qualification; Criminal Acts; Destruction of Other People's Property.},
		abstract = {Introduction: The current crimes encountered are crimes committed jointly or with participation (deelneming).Purposes of the Research:  The purpose of the study is to analyze and discuss how the qualifications of each actor in the crime of destroying other people's property are carried out together and to analyze and discuss how the form of accountability of the perpetrators of the criminal act of destroying other people's property is carried out together.Methods of the Research: This method of research in writing uses a type of normative juridical research that examines positive legal provisions, legal principles, and legal doctrines, using approaches: statute approach and conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials through literature studies and legal material analysis techniques in this study uses qualitative analysis techniques.Results of the Research: Based on the results of the research, the qualifications of each defendant are not the same, namely the defendant Helmi Untarola who has acted as an advocate (uitlokker) as well as a perpetrator (pleger) in the crime. Then there were 3 (three) other defendants, namely the defendant Ayub Marshel Balubun, the defendant Frangky Wakim, and the defendant Marten Wakim who had followed the advice of the defendant Helmi Untarola. Defendant I Helmy Untarola Defendant II Ayub Marshel Balubun, Defendant III Franky Wakim, and Defendant IV Marten Wakim were proven legally to have committed a criminal act of "Damaging other people's property together and based on the Dobo District Court Decision Number 32/Pid.B/2020/ PN. Dobo the defendants were sentenced to 5 months and paid court fees of Rp. 2000 (two thousand rupiah) each.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {416--427}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1102}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

A L. Wisnubroto, (2014), Praktik Persidangan Pidana, Yogyakarta: Universitas Atmajaya

https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/9015/8569

Jacob Hattu, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, Elias Zadrack Leasa, Anna Maria Salamor, (2021) Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Kekayaan Negara, Jurnal Belo, 7 (2), 213-222 https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol7issue1page213-222

Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, The Essence of Human Rights Violations in Social Conflict in Maluku (After The Riots In 1999), Information and Knowledge Management 9, no. 8 (2019): 33-42, DOI: 10.7176/IKM

Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahel, Legal Liability for Crimes against Humanity as A Form of Human Rights Violation (Criminal Law Perspective), Law Reform, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2022, h. 28

Lilik Mulyadi, (2007), Kompilasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Teoritis dan Praktek

Peradilan, Bandung: Mandar Maju

Loebby Loebby, (1996), Percobaan, Penyertaan dan Gabungan Tindak Pidana, Jakarta : Universitas Tarumanegara

M. Boerdiarto-K.Wantjik Saleh, (1982) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia

Moeljatno, (2015), Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta : Bina Aksara

Remmelink, J, (2003), Hukum Pidana Komentar atas Pasal Terpenting dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padanannya dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama

R.Susilo, (1996), KUHP Serta Komentar-komentarnya Lengkap Pasal demi Pasal, Bogor : Politeia

Tommy J Bassang, (2015) Pertanggunjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Deelneming, Jurnal Lex Crime, 4 (5), 122-128

Full Text: PDF