Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama

Mei Indah Ngilyaubun; Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu; Jacob Hattu

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102

Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama

Mei Indah Ngilyaubun⁽¹⁾, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu⁽²⁾, Jacob Hattu⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: The current crimes encountered are crimes committed jointly or with participation (deelneming).

Purposes of the Research: The purpose of the study is to analyze and discuss how the qualifications of each actor in the crime of destroying other people's property are carried out together and to analyze and discuss how the form of accountability of the perpetrators of the criminal act of destroying other people's property is carried out together.

Methods of the Research: This method of research in writing uses a type of normative juridical research that examines positive legal provisions, legal principles, and legal doctrines, using approaches: statute approach and conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials through literature studies and legal material analysis techniques in this study uses qualitative analysis techniques.

Results of the Research: Based on the results of the research, the qualifications of each defendant are not the same, namely the defendant Helmi Untarola who has acted as an advocate (uitlokker) as well as a perpetrator (pleger) in the crime. Then there were 3 (three) other defendants, namely the defendant Ayub Marshel Balubun, the defendant Frangky Wakim, and the defendant Marten Wakim who had followed the advice of the defendant Helmi Untarola. Defendant I Helmy Untarola Defendant II Ayub Marshel Balubun, Defendant III Franky Wakim, and Defendant IV Marten Wakim were proven legally to have committed a criminal act of "Damaging other people's property together and based on the Dobo District Court Decision Number 32/Pid.B/2020/ PN. Dobo the defendants were sentenced to 5 months and paid court fees of Rp. 2000 (two thousand rupiah) each.

Keywords

Qualification; Criminal Acts; Destruction of Other People's Property.

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102

Published

2022-06-30

How To Cite

APA: Ngilyaubun, M.I., Titahelu, J.A., & Hattu, J. (2022). Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(4), 416 – 427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102.

IEEE: M.I. Ngilyaubun, J.A. Titahelu, and J. Hattu, "Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 416 – 427, Jun. 2022. Accessed on: May. 9, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102

Harvard: Ngilyaubun, M.I., Titahelu, J.A., and Hattu, J., (2022). "Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2(4), pp. 416 – 427. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102 (Accessed on: 9 May 2025)

Chicago: Ngilyaubun, Mei Indah, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, and Jacob Hattu. "Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 4 (June 30, 2022): 416 – 427. Accessed May 9, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102

Vancouver: Ngilyaubun MI, Titahelu JA, Hattu J. Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Jun 30 [cited 2025 May 9];2(4):416 – 427. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102

MLA 8th: Ngilyaubun, Mei Indah, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, and Jacob Hattu. "Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 2, no. 4, 30 Jun. 2022, pp. 416 – 427, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102. Accessed 9 May. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI1102,
		author = {Mei Ngilyaubun and Juanrico Titahelu and Jacob Hattu},
		title = {Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {2},
		number = {4},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Qualification; Criminal Acts; Destruction of Other People's Property.},
		abstract = {Introduction: The current crimes encountered are crimes committed jointly or with participation (deelneming).Purposes of the Research:  The purpose of the study is to analyze and discuss how the qualifications of each actor in the crime of destroying other people's property are carried out together and to analyze and discuss how the form of accountability of the perpetrators of the criminal act of destroying other people's property is carried out together.Methods of the Research: This method of research in writing uses a type of normative juridical research that examines positive legal provisions, legal principles, and legal doctrines, using approaches: statute approach and conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials through literature studies and legal material analysis techniques in this study uses qualitative analysis techniques.Results of the Research: Based on the results of the research, the qualifications of each defendant are not the same, namely the defendant Helmi Untarola who has acted as an advocate (uitlokker) as well as a perpetrator (pleger) in the crime. Then there were 3 (three) other defendants, namely the defendant Ayub Marshel Balubun, the defendant Frangky Wakim, and the defendant Marten Wakim who had followed the advice of the defendant Helmi Untarola. Defendant I Helmy Untarola Defendant II Ayub Marshel Balubun, Defendant III Franky Wakim, and Defendant IV Marten Wakim were proven legally to have committed a criminal act of "Damaging other people's property together and based on the Dobo District Court Decision Number 32/Pid.B/2020/ PN. Dobo the defendants were sentenced to 5 months and paid court fees of Rp. 2000 (two thousand rupiah) each.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {416--427}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1102}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

A L. Wisnubroto, (2014), Praktik Persidangan Pidana, Yogyakarta: Universitas Atmajaya

https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/9015/8569

Jacob Hattu, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, Elias Zadrack Leasa, Anna Maria Salamor, (2021) Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Kekayaan Negara, Jurnal Belo, 7 (2), 213-222 https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol7issue1page213-222

Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, The Essence of Human Rights Violations in Social Conflict in Maluku (After The Riots In 1999), Information and Knowledge Management 9, no. 8 (2019): 33-42, DOI: 10.7176/IKM

Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahel, Legal Liability for Crimes against Humanity as A Form of Human Rights Violation (Criminal Law Perspective), Law Reform, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2022, h. 28

Lilik Mulyadi, (2007), Kompilasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Teoritis dan Praktek

Peradilan, Bandung: Mandar Maju

Loebby Loebby, (1996), Percobaan, Penyertaan dan Gabungan Tindak Pidana, Jakarta : Universitas Tarumanegara

M. Boerdiarto-K.Wantjik Saleh, (1982) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia

Moeljatno, (2015), Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta : Bina Aksara

Remmelink, J, (2003), Hukum Pidana Komentar atas Pasal Terpenting dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padanannya dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama

R.Susilo, (1996), KUHP Serta Komentar-komentarnya Lengkap Pasal demi Pasal, Bogor : Politeia

Tommy J Bassang, (2015) Pertanggunjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Deelneming, Jurnal Lex Crime, 4 (5), 122-128

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 707 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 2022 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Kualifikasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengrusakan Barang yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Mei Indah Ngilyaubun; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Jacob Hattu; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Qualification; Criminal Acts; Destruction of Other People's Property.

4.	Description	Abstract	Introduction: The current crimes encountered are crimes committed jointly or with participation (deelneming).Purposes of the Research: The purpose of the study is to analyze and discuss how the qualifications of each actor in the crime of destroying other people's property are carried out together and to analyze and discuss how the form of accountability of the perpetrators of the criminal act of destroying other people's property is carried out together.Methods of the Research: This method of research in writing uses a type of normative juridical research that examines positive legal provisions, legal principles, and legal doctrines, using approaches: statute approach and conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials through literature studies and legal material analysis techniques in this study uses qualitative analysis techniques.Results of the Research: Based on the results of the research, the qualifications of each defendant are not the same, namely the defendant Helmi Untarola who has acted as an advocate (uitlokker) as well as a perpetrator (pleger) in the crime. Then there were 3 (three) other defendants, namely the defendant Ayub Marshel Balubun, the defendant Frangky Wakim, and the defendant Marten Wakim who had followed the advice of the defendant Helmi Untarola. Defendant I Helmy Untarola Defendant II Ayub Marshel Balubun, Defendant III Franky Wakim, and Defendant IV Marten Wakim were proven legally to have committed a criminal act of "Damaging other people's property together and based on the Dobo District Court Decision Number 32/Pid.B/2020/ PN. Dobo the defendants were sentenced to 5 months and paid court fees of Rp. 2000 (two thousand rupiah) each.

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law Pattimura University

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2022-06-30

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1102

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/tatohi.v2i4.1102

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 2, No 4 (2022): Volume 2 Nomor 4, Juni 2022

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..