Pertanggungjawaban Perbankan Sebagai Korporasi Atas Penggelapan Dana Nasabah yang Dilakukan oleh Pegawai Bank
), Elsa Rina Maya Toule(2), Margie Gladies Sopacua(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: This article examines the judges' considerations in imposing criminal penalties against defendants who commit banking crimes under Article 49 paragraph (1) letters a and b of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 10 of 1998 in conjunction with Article 64 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code in the Supreme Court Decision Number 470/pi.B/2021/PN.AMB with the problem of fraud mode.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and explain the process of law enforcement for criminal acts in the embezzlement of customer funds by bank employees at PT.Bank BRI Ambn branch.
Methods of the Research: The type of research used is legal research "Normative Juridical"..
Results of the Research: The results of the study indicate that according to the Banking Law, corporations cannot be held criminally responsible, but rather those who give orders or are leaders of corporations. In the event that a bank commits a crime or does not fulfill its obligations from Bank Indonesia, the bank concerned will be subject to administrative sanctions. Then in the event that an employee or bank employee commits a crime, criminal liability is imposed on an individual (perpetrator) or corporate management with a record that the corporation has benefited from the crime committed by the employee.Keywords
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI1114,
author = {Suci Sulistiawati and Elsa Toule and Margie Sopacua},
title = {Pertanggungjawaban Perbankan Sebagai Korporasi Atas Penggelapan Dana Nasabah yang Dilakukan oleh Pegawai Bank},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {2},
number = {5},
year = {2022},
keywords = {Banking; Criminal Liability; Corporation},
abstract = {Introduction: This article examines the judges' considerations in imposing criminal penalties against defendants who commit banking crimes under Article 49 paragraph (1) letters a and b of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 10 of 1998 in conjunction with Article 64 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code in the Supreme Court Decision Number 470/pi.B/2021/PN.AMB with the problem of fraud mode. Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and explain the process of law enforcement for criminal acts in the embezzlement of customer funds by bank employees at PT.Bank BRI Ambn branch. Methods of the Research: The type of research used is legal research "Normative Juridical"..Results of the Research: The results of the study indicate that according to the Banking Law, corporations cannot be held criminally responsible, but rather those who give orders or are leaders of corporations. In the event that a bank commits a crime or does not fulfill its obligations from Bank Indonesia, the bank concerned will be subject to administrative sanctions. Then in the event that an employee or bank employee commits a crime, criminal liability is imposed on an individual (perpetrator) or corporate management with a record that the corporation has benefited from the crime committed by the employee.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {509--522} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1114},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1114}
}
Adam, Sherly. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Pembobolan Kartu Kredit Dalam Tindak Pidana di Bidang Perbankan . Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 2, No.2, April 2022.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.. Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.
Djumahuna, Muhammad. Hukum Perbankan di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993.
Effendy, Marwan. Tipologi Kejahatan Perbankan dari Prespektif Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Referensi, 2012.
Erickson. Praktik Bank Gelap Sama Dengan Rentenir. 2022. http://m.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/lt4e36923a97ac7/praktik-bank-gelap-sama-dengan-rentenir.
Gazali, Djoni S, dan Rachmadi Usman. Hukum Perbankan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, n.d.
Hatrik, Hamzah. Asas Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana (Strict Liability dan Vicarious Liability). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996.
Heaton, Russel. Criminal Law Textbook. London: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana di Bidang Ekonomi. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro Press, 2013.
Kristian. Tindak Pidana Perbankan. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia, 2013.
Kristian, dan Yopi Gunawan. Tindak Pidana Perbankan dalam Proses Peradilan di Indonesia. Jakarta Timur: Prenadamedia Grup, 2018.
Mahkamah Agung. “Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 470/Pid.B/2021/PN.Amb Tahun 2021,” 2021.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1998.
Mohammad Himawan., Saartje Sarah Alfons, and Renny Heronia Nendissa. “Ratio Decidendi Terhadap Amar Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Pada Perkara Pemberhentian Tidak Dengan Hormat Aparatur Sipil Negara Terpidana Korupsi”. PATTIMURA Legal Journal 1, no. 1 (2022): 60-65.
Muladi. Penerapan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalan Hukun Pidana. Universitas Diponegoro (UNDIP), 2004.
Muladi, dan Dwidja Priyanto. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Kencana Pranada Media Group, 2010.
Yunara, Edi. Korupsi dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012.
: 2031 times
Download : 3532 times
DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v2i5.1114
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Suci Sulistiawati, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, Margie Gladies Sopacua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
