Mekanisme Penggunaan Closed Circuit Television Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i7.1133Keywords:
Arrangement, The Crime of Murder, CCTV Evidence ToolAbstract
Introduction: Closed Circuit Television (CCTV)) is a digital video camera device that is used to transmit signals to a monitor screen in a certain room or place. It has the aim of being able to monitor the situation or condition of a certain place, so that it can prevent the occurrence of a crime or can be used as evidence of a crime that has occurred.
Purposes of the Research: Analyze and discuss the mechanism of using CCTV as evidence of evidence in the crime of murder and Knowing the obstacles in using CCTV as evidence of instructions in the crime of murderMethods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical research method because it uses a literature study that adheres to the juridical aspects with the types of statutory approaches, conceptual approaches, and case approaches.
Results of the Research: The results of the study show that CCTV in its mechanism can be used as evidence for instructions in a criminal act, especially a crime of murder, if the CCTV has a link between witness statements, letters, and the defendant's statement as stated in Article 188 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code although there are several obstacles in the evidentiary process such as unclear CCTV footage and different expert views regarding the use of CCTV recordings as evidence for instructions in the process of proving the crime of murder.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Adam Chazawi, Kejahatan Terhadap Tubuh dan Nyawa, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001.
CNN Indonesia, (2016, 01 Februari). Kronologi Kasus Mirna Hingga Penahanan Jessica. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/2016.
Efa Laela Fakhriah, Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Perdata, Bandung: Alumni, 2011.
Gerry Putra Ginting, “Penegakan Hukum Oleh Polri Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Kendaraan Bermotor Dengan Kekerasan”, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, (2015), h. 4.
Hilman Hadikusuma, Bahasa Hukum Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni, 1992.
M.Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Jilid I, Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini, 1985, h. 793.
Ramiyanto, “Bukti Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana”, Junal Hukum dan Peradilan 6, no. 3, (2017): 463-484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.463-484
R. Subekti, Hukum Pembuktian, Cetakan ke-15, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2005
Sherly Adam, “Fungsi Keterangan Ahli Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan”, Jurnal Belo 4, no. 2 (2019): 158-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol4issue2page158-175
Zainudin Al, Hukum Pidana Islam, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Michelle Nicole Sarimanella, Sherly Adam, Elias Zadrach Leasa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
How to Cite
