Mekanisme Penggunaan Closed Circuit Television Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan

Michelle Nicole Sarimanella(1email), Sherly Adam(2), Elias Zadrach Leasa(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Closed Circuit Television (CCTV)) is a digital video camera device that is used to transmit signals to a monitor screen in a certain room or place. It has the aim of being able to monitor the situation or condition of a certain place, so that it can prevent the occurrence of a crime or can be used as evidence of a crime that has occurred.

Purposes of the Research:  Analyze and discuss the mechanism of using CCTV as evidence of evidence in the crime of murder and Knowing the obstacles in using CCTV as evidence of instructions in the crime of murder

Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical research method because it uses a literature study that adheres to the juridical aspects with the types of statutory approaches, conceptual approaches, and case approaches.

Results of the Research: The results of the study show that CCTV in its mechanism can be used as evidence for instructions in a criminal act, especially a crime of murder, if the CCTV has a link between witness statements, letters, and the defendant's statement as stated in Article 188 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code although there are several obstacles in the evidentiary process such as unclear CCTV footage and different expert views regarding the use of CCTV recordings as evidence for instructions in the process of proving the crime of murder.

Keywords


Arrangement; The Crime of Murder; CCTV Evidence Tool

How To Cite


APA: Sarimanella, M.N., Adam, S., & Leasa, E.Z. (2022). Mekanisme Penggunaan Closed Circuit Television Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(7), 720 – 727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i7.1133.
IEEE: M.N. Sarimanella, S. Adam, and E.Z. Leasa, "Mekanisme Penggunaan Closed Circuit Television Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 720 – 727, Sep. 2022. Accessed on: Mar. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i7.1133
Harvard: Sarimanella, M.N., Adam, S., and Leasa, E.Z., (2022). "Mekanisme Penggunaan Closed Circuit Television Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2(7), pp. 720 – 727. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i7.1133 (Accessed on: 29 March 2024)
Chicago: Sarimanella, Michelle Nicole, Sherly Adam, and Elias Zadrach Leasa. "Mekanisme Penggunaan Closed Circuit Television Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 7 (September 19, 2022): 720 – 727. Accessed March 29, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i7.1133
Vancouver: Sarimanella MN, Adam S, Leasa EZ. Mekanisme Penggunaan Closed Circuit Television Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Sep 19 [cited 2024 Mar 29];2(7):720 – 727. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i7.1133
MLA 8th: Sarimanella, Michelle Nicole, Sherly Adam, and Elias Zadrach Leasa. "Mekanisme Penggunaan Closed Circuit Television Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 2, no. 7, 19 Sep. 2022, pp. 720 – 727, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i7.1133. Accessed 29 Mar. 2024.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI1133,
		author = {Michelle Sarimanella and Sherly Adam and Elias Leasa},
		title = {Mekanisme Penggunaan Closed Circuit Television Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {2},
		number = {7},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Arrangement; The Crime of Murder; CCTV Evidence Tool},
		abstract = {Introduction: Closed Circuit Television (CCTV)) is a digital video camera device that is used to transmit signals to a monitor screen in a certain room or place. It has the aim of being able to monitor the situation or condition of a certain place, so that it can prevent the occurrence of a crime or can be used as evidence of a crime that has occurred.Purposes of the Research:  Analyze and discuss the mechanism of using CCTV as evidence of evidence in the crime of murder and Knowing the obstacles in using CCTV as evidence of instructions in the crime of murderMethods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical research method because it uses a literature study that adheres to the juridical aspects with the types of statutory approaches, conceptual approaches, and case approaches.Results of the Research: The results of the study show that CCTV in its mechanism can be used as evidence for instructions in a criminal act, especially a crime of murder, if the CCTV has a link between witness statements, letters, and the defendant's statement as stated in Article 188 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code although there are several obstacles in the evidentiary process such as unclear CCTV footage and different expert views regarding the use of CCTV recordings as evidence for instructions in the process of proving the crime of murder.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {720--727}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i7.1133},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1133}
		}
		
RefWorks:

Citation format: 


Adam Chazawi, Kejahatan Terhadap Tubuh dan Nyawa, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001.

CNN Indonesia, (2016, 01 Februari). Kronologi Kasus Mirna Hingga Penahanan Jessica. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/2016.

Efa Laela Fakhriah, Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Perdata, Bandung: Alumni, 2011.

Gerry Putra Ginting, “Penegakan Hukum Oleh Polri Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Kendaraan Bermotor Dengan Kekerasan”, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, (2015), h. 4.

Hilman Hadikusuma, Bahasa Hukum Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni, 1992.

M.Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Jilid I, Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini, 1985, h. 793.

Ramiyanto, “Bukti Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana”, Junal Hukum dan Peradilan 6, no. 3, (2017): 463-484.

R. Subekti, Hukum Pembuktian, Cetakan ke-15, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2005

Sherly Adam, “Fungsi Keterangan Ahli Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan”, Jurnal Belo 4, no. 2 (2019): 158-175.

Zainudin Al, Hukum Pidana Islam, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 1333 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 4625 times



DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v2i7.1133

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Michelle Nicole Sarimanella, Sherly Adam, Elias Zadrach Leasa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.