Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Perkara Pencurian Pemberatan (Vide Pasal 363 Ayat 1 Kuhpidana)

Aditya Putra Mentari Malaihollo; John Dirk Pasalbessy; Margie Gladies Sopacua

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i10.1961

Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Perkara Pencurian Pemberatan (Vide Pasal 363 Ayat 1 Kuhpidana)

Aditya Putra Mentari Malaihollo⁽¹⁾, John Dirk Pasalbessy⁽²⁾, Margie Gladies Sopacua⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: There are several types of theft crimes ranging from ordinary theft crimes (Article 362 of the Criminal Code), light theft crimes (Article 364 of the Criminal Code), crimes of aggravated or qualified theft (Article 363 of the Criminal Code), crimes of violent theft (Article 365 of the Criminal Code), crimes of theft in within the family (Article 367 of the Criminal Code) with a maximum sentence of 7 years in prison.

Purposes of the Research:Analyzing and reviewing the application of Article 363 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code in resolving cases of theft and Analyzing Article 363 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code can be used as a basis for consideration in cases of theft with violence, as one of the requirements in completing studies at the Faculty of Law.

Results of the Research:In the application of article 363 in the case of theft, the elements of article 363 can be applied, namely: Whoever, Takes something, With the intention of being owned, is against the law and is carried out at night in a house or a closed yard with a house. When all the elements in article 363 are met, the perpetrator's actions are determined as theft with weights but in the decision N0 18/Pid.B/20202/PN Msh this is not the case because the judge's decision is still too light even though the defendant's actions meet the weighting elements. Article 363 can be used as a basis for judges' considerations because the elements in Article 363 can be used by judges as a basis for consideration before the judge decides on a theft case, but in decision N0 18/Pid.B/20202/PN, the judge does not see the elements that have been fulfilled. by the defendant's actions so that the judge handed down a decision that was not in accordance with the provisions of Article 363 of the Criminal Code.

Keywords

Juridical Analysis; Judges Considerations; Theft Cases

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v3i10.1961

Published

2023-12-30

How To Cite

APA: Malaihollo, A.P., Pasalbessy, J.D., & Sopacua, M.G. (2023). Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Perkara Pencurian Pemberatan (Vide Pasal 363 Ayat 1 Kuhpidana). TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(10), 1020–1030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i10.1961.

IEEE: A.P. Malaihollo, J.D. Pasalbessy, and M.G. Sopacua, "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Perkara Pencurian Pemberatan (Vide Pasal 363 Ayat 1 Kuhpidana)", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 1020–1030, Dec. 2023. Accessed on: May. 7, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i10.1961

Harvard: Malaihollo, A.P., Pasalbessy, J.D., and Sopacua, M.G., (2023). "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Perkara Pencurian Pemberatan (Vide Pasal 363 Ayat 1 Kuhpidana)". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 3(10), pp. 1020–1030. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i10.1961 (Accessed on: 7 May 2025)

Chicago: Malaihollo, Aditya Putra Mentari, John Dirk Pasalbessy, and Margie Gladies Sopacua. "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Perkara Pencurian Pemberatan (Vide Pasal 363 Ayat 1 Kuhpidana)." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 10 (December 30, 2023): 1020–1030. Accessed May 7, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i10.1961

Vancouver: Malaihollo AP, Pasalbessy JD, Sopacua MG. Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Perkara Pencurian Pemberatan (Vide Pasal 363 Ayat 1 Kuhpidana). TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2023 Dec 30 [cited 2025 May 7];3(10):1020–1030. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i10.1961

MLA 8th: Malaihollo, Aditya Putra Mentari, John Dirk Pasalbessy, and Margie Gladies Sopacua. "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Perkara Pencurian Pemberatan (Vide Pasal 363 Ayat 1 Kuhpidana)." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 3, no. 10, 30 Dec. 2023, pp. 1020–1030, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v3i10.1961. Accessed 7 May. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI1961,
		author = {Aditya Malaihollo and John Pasalbessy and Margie Sopacua},
		title = {Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Perkara Pencurian Pemberatan (Vide Pasal 363 Ayat 1 Kuhpidana)},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {3},
		number = {10},
		year = {2023},
		keywords = {Juridical Analysis; Judges Considerations; Theft Cases},
		abstract = {Introduction: There are several types of theft crimes ranging from ordinary theft crimes (Article 362 of the Criminal Code), light theft crimes (Article 364 of the Criminal Code), crimes of aggravated or qualified theft (Article 363 of the Criminal Code), crimes of violent theft (Article 365 of the Criminal Code), crimes of theft in within the family (Article 367 of the Criminal Code) with a maximum sentence of 7 years in prison.Purposes of the Research:Analyzing and reviewing the application of Article 363 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code in resolving cases of theft and Analyzing Article 363 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code can be used as a basis for consideration in cases of theft with violence, as one of the requirements in completing studies at the Faculty of Law.Results of the Research:In the application of article 363 in the case of theft, the elements of article 363 can be applied, namely: Whoever, Takes something, With the intention of being owned, is against the law and is carried out at night in a house or a closed yard with a house. When all the elements in article 363 are met, the perpetrator's actions are determined as theft with weights but in the decision N0 18/Pid.B/20202/PN Msh this is not the case because the judge's decision is still too light even though the defendant's actions meet the weighting elements. Article 363 can be used as a basis for judges' considerations because the elements in Article 363 can be used by judges as a basis for consideration before the judge decides on a theft case, but in decision N0 18/Pid.B/20202/PN, the judge does not see the elements that have been fulfilled. by the defendant's actions so that the judge handed down a decision that was not in accordance with the provisions of Article 363 of the Criminal Code.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {1020--1030}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v3i10.1961},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1961}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Jurnal

Erwin Ubwarin, Jacob Hattu dan Wilshen Leatemia, Budaya Hukum Anti Korupsi Pada Warga Binaan Lapas Klas Ii A Ambon, Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, Vol 1, No 2, Juni 2020

Tino YS Hattu, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, and Hadibah Zachra Wadjo. "Penyidikan Terhadap Pelaku Pencurian Benda Sitaan Pada Rumah Penyimpanan Benda Sitaan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1.10 (2021): 1047-1061.

Buku

Azhary, Negara Hukum Indonesai (Analisis Yuridis Normatif Tentang UnsurUnsurnya) , UI Press, Jakarta, 1995

Atmasasmita, Romli. Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Persepektif Eksistensialisme dan Abolisionisme. Putra Abardin. Bandung: 1996

Marpaung, Leden., Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. 1992

Chazawi, Adami, , Pelajaran Hukum Pidana, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Wirjono prodjodikoro, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1986

Nugroho, Hibnu. Bunga Rampai Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Badan Penerbit Undip Semarang: 2010

Roni Hanitjo Soemitro, metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Yurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1980

Sudarto, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1986

Harkristuti Harkrisnowo, Rekonstruksi Konsep Pemidanaan: Suatu Gugatan Terhadap Proses Legislasi dan Pemidanaan di Indonesia, Orasi Pengukuhan Guru Besar di Universitas Indonesia, Depok: 8 Maret 2003

Chazawi, Adami. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. 2002

Pidada, I. B. A., Sopacua, M. G., Titahelu, J. A. S., Fardiansyah, H., Rizkia, N. D., Mulyana, Y., ... & Surya, A,HUKUM PIDANA, (2022).

Online/World Wide Web

https://pengacarafaisalnasution.com/2019/09/06/apa-beda-pencurian-biasa-dengan-pencurian-dengan-pemberatan/

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 330 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 1791 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Perkara Pencurian Pemberatan (Vide Pasal 363 Ayat 1 Kuhpidana)

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Aditya Putra Mentari Malaihollo; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	John Dirk Pasalbessy; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Margie Gladies Sopacua; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Juridical Analysis; Judges Considerations; Theft Cases

4.	Description	Abstract	Introduction: There are several types of theft crimes ranging from ordinary theft crimes (Article 362 of the Criminal Code), light theft crimes (Article 364 of the Criminal Code), crimes of aggravated or qualified theft (Article 363 of the Criminal Code), crimes of violent theft (Article 365 of the Criminal Code), crimes of theft in within the family (Article 367 of the Criminal Code) with a maximum sentence of 7 years in prison.Purposes of the Research:Analyzing and reviewing the application of Article 363 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code in resolving cases of theft and Analyzing Article 363 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code can be used as a basis for consideration in cases of theft with violence, as one of the requirements in completing studies at the Faculty of Law.Results of the Research:In the application of article 363 in the case of theft, the elements of article 363 can be applied, namely: Whoever, Takes something, With the intention of being owned, is against the law and is carried out at night in a house or a closed yard with a house. When all the elements in article 363 are met, the perpetrator's actions are determined as theft with weights but in the decision N0 18/Pid.B/20202/PN Msh this is not the case because the judge's decision is still too light even though the defendant's actions meet the weighting elements. Article 363 can be used as a basis for judges' considerations because the elements in Article 363 can be used by judges as a basis for consideration before the judge decides on a theft case, but in decision N0 18/Pid.B/20202/PN, the judge does not see the elements that have been fulfilled. by the defendant's actions so that the judge handed down a decision that was not in accordance with the provisions of Article 363 of the Criminal Code.

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law Pattimura University

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)	Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2023-12-30

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1961

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/tatohi.v3i10.1961

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 3, No 10 (2023): Volume 3 Nomor 10, Desember 2023

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..