Upaya Hukum Filipina untuk Mendapatkan Hak Berdaulat atas Kepulauan Kalayaan (Kepulauan Spartly)
), Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata(2), Dyah Ridhul Airin Daties(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The Spratly Archipelago are one of the archipelago located in the South China Sea and have relatively many natural potentials so that these islands are claimed by several countries, one of which is the Philippines. The Philippines claims several islands and considers that the Philippines has legality of sovereign rights in the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone, and names the claimed islands as the Kalayaan islands, but the claims made by the Philippines are challenged by several countries, one of which is China. Therefore, this paper will further examine Philippine legal efforts to gain sovereign righs over the Kalayaan acrhipelago (Spratly Archipelago).
Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this writing is, the legality of the Philippine sovereign rights in the Kalayaan Archipelago (Spartly Archipelago) according to UNCLOS 1982.
Methods of the Research: Research methods are used with namely normative research types, statutory approaches and case approaches, primary legal materials and secondary and material collection procedures using library research and documentary studies.
Results of the Research: From the results of the research, the problem shows that the legality of the Philippines, which is a coastal state, has sovereign rights over the EEZ in its territory. The claim made by the Philippines in the Spratly Islands against Kalayaan can be said to be legal because it has a fairly strong juridical and factual basis, seen when the Arbitase Court in The Hague won the Philippine lawsuit over the case of the Spratly Islands which has been claimed as its territory. The judge emphasized that China does not have an Exclusive Economic Zone in the Spratly Islands, which has been in dispute with the Philippines. Each coastal State is obliged to respect each other's sovereign rights in the EEZ of each country. The Philippines must take a new way to gain legal force on the sovereign rights of the Philippine EEZ, one of which is to submit a request to the International Court of Justice to cooperate and make a joint agreement with the disputing countries so that the legality of the Philippines' sovereign rights is recognized.Keywords
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI570,
author = {Olivia Inuhan and Lucia Tahamata and Dyah Daties},
title = {Upaya Hukum Filipina untuk Mendapatkan Hak Berdaulat atas Kepulauan Kalayaan (Kepulauan Spartly)},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {1},
number = {3},
year = {2021},
keywords = {Kalayaan Archipelago (Spratly); Legality; Sovereign Rights; UNCLOS 1982},
abstract = {Introduction: The Spratly Archipelago are one of the archipelago located in the South China Sea and have relatively many natural potentials so that these islands are claimed by several countries, one of which is the Philippines. The Philippines claims several islands and considers that the Philippines has legality of sovereign rights in the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone, and names the claimed islands as the Kalayaan islands, but the claims made by the Philippines are challenged by several countries, one of which is China. Therefore, this paper will further examine Philippine legal efforts to gain sovereign righs over the Kalayaan acrhipelago (Spratly Archipelago).Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this writing is, the legality of the Philippine sovereign rights in the Kalayaan Archipelago (Spartly Archipelago) according to UNCLOS 1982.Methods of the Research: Research methods are used with namely normative research types, statutory approaches and case approaches, primary legal materials and secondary and material collection procedures using library research and documentary studies.Results of the Research: From the results of the research, the problem shows that the legality of the Philippines, which is a coastal state, has sovereign rights over the EEZ in its territory. The claim made by the Philippines in the Spratly Islands against Kalayaan can be said to be legal because it has a fairly strong juridical and factual basis, seen when the Arbitase Court in The Hague won the Philippine lawsuit over the case of the Spratly Islands which has been claimed as its territory. The judge emphasized that China does not have an Exclusive Economic Zone in the Spratly Islands, which has been in dispute with the Philippines. Each coastal State is obliged to respect each other's sovereign rights in the EEZ of each country. The Philippines must take a new way to gain legal force on the sovereign rights of the Philippine EEZ, one of which is to submit a request to the International Court of Justice to cooperate and make a joint agreement with the disputing countries so that the legality of the Philippines' sovereign rights is recognized.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {192--205} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.570},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/570}
}
Anwar, Chairul. Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Di Dalam Hukum Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1995. Chung, Christopher. “The Spratly Islands Dispute : Decision Units and Domestic Politics.” UNSW Library, 2004. https://www.unsworks.unsw.edu.au/primo-explore/fulldisplay/unsworks_3198/UNSWORKS. Deogracias, Charmaine. “Modernizing the AFP & Duterte’s Priorities.” Asia Pacific Bulletin 350, no. 8 (2016): 1–2. https://www.eastwestcenter.org/system/tdf/private/apb350.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=35782. Departemen of National Defense of the republic of Philippines. “Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Encanched Defense Coorporation Agreement.” dfa.gov.ph, 2014. https://dfa.gov.ph/dfa-releases/2693-frequently-asked-questions-faqs-on-the-enhanced-defense-cooperation-agreement. Departemen Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. Buku Putih Pertahanan Indonesia 2008. Jakarta: Departemen Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, 2008. https://www.kemhan.go.id/ppid/2014/01/20/buku-putih-pertahanan-indonesia-2008/. Departement of Foreign Affairs of Republic of Phillipines. “SFA Statement on the UNCLOS Arbital Proceefings against China.” dfa.gov.ph, 2013. https://dfa.gov.ph/newsroom/unclos/216-sfa-statement-on-the-unclos-arbitral-proceedings-against-china. Greitens, Sheena Chestnut. “The U.S.-Philippine Alliance in a Year of Transition: Challenges and Opportunities.” 5. Washington, D.C, 2016. https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-u-s-philippine-alliance-in-a-year-of-transition-challenges-and-opportunities/. Habulan, Antonio Atancio A. “Acquisition Planning for the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) Modernization Program.” Naval Postgraduate School, 2002. https://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/3804. Hadiwijoyo, Suryo Sakti. Perbatasan Negara Dalam Dimensi Hukum Internasional. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2011. Hidayat, Khotib Iqbal, Aris Priyadi, and Elly Kristiani Purwendah. “Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) Dan Konvensional.” Batulis Civil Law Review 1, no. 1 (2020): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421. Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar, and Etty R Agoes. Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Bandung: Alumni, 2015. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum,. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016. https://doi.org/340.072. Mayasari, Ledyashinta, Sri Yuniati, and Djoko Susilo. “Klaim Filipina Atas Kepulauan Kalayaan (Spratly).” Universitas Jember. 2013. http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/58947. Mogato, Manuel. “Philippines’ Spratlys Tourism Plan Likely to Rile China.” Reuters.com, 2012. https://www.reuters.com/article/philippines-china-idUSL3E8F24OY20120402. Ningsih, Ocie April, Mexsasai Indra, and Widia Edorita. “Sengketa Kepemilikan Kepulauan Spratly Di Laut China Selatan Berdasarkan UNCLOS III (United Nations Convention On The Law Of The Sea) Tahun 1982.” Jurnal Online Mahasiswa 3, no. 2 (2016): 1–5. https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFHUKUM/article/view/12795. Nugraha, Athanasius Aditya. “Manuver Politik China Dalam Konflik Laut China Selatan.” Jurnal Pertahanan 1, no. 3 (2011): 55–63. https://www.academia.edu/8279356/Jurnal_III_Athanasius_Aditya_Nugraha. Parthiana, I Wayan. Hukum Laut Internasional Dan Hukum Laut Indonesia. Bandung: Yrama Widya, 2014. Rowan, Joshua P. “The U.S.-Japan Security Alliance, ASEAN, and the South China Sea Dispute.” Asian Survey 45, no. 3 (2005): 414–36. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2005.45.3.414. Sinaga, Huminca. “Laut Tiongkok Selatan Milik Filipina.” PikiranRakyat.com, 2016. https://www.pikiran-rakyat.com/internasional/pr-01260033/laut-tiongkok-selatan-milik-filipina-37451. Talmon, Stefan. “The South China Sea Arbitration and the Finality of ‘Final’ Awards.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 8, no. 2 (2017): 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idw027. Tan, Jaspel, and Wang Chun Kai. “Spratly Islands Conflict over Territory.” Damian James, 2012. https://slideplayer.com/slide/7029183/. the Research and Special Studies Division. “Towards a Self-Reliant Defense Force: A Look into the AFP Modernization Law.” The National Defense College of The Philippines. May 17, 2013. http://www.ndcp.edu.ph/. Voa Indonesia. “Filipina Akan Perkokoh Eksistensi Di Kepulauan Spratly.” voaindonesia.com, 2017. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/filipina-akan-perkokoh-eksistensi-di-kepulauan-spratly/3798810.html. Winarwati, Indien. “Penguatan Hak Berdaulat (Souvereign Right) Pada ZEE Indonesia Dalam Rangka Perlindungan Sumber Daya Alam Laut.” LEGALITY: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 24, no. 2 (2016): 172–80. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/4268.
: 1180 times
Download : 2664 times
DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.570
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Olivia Lebrina Inuhan, Lucia Charlota Octovina Tahamata, Dyah Ridhul Airin Daties
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
