Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan 	Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018

Hamdi Pune; Elsa Rina Maya Toule; Erwin Ubwarin

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664

Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018

Hamdi Pune⁽¹⁾, Elsa Rina Maya Toule⁽²⁾, Erwin Ubwarin⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: Judges must be free to conduct legal considerations, and feel confident in what they are trying, so that they can impose sentences according to their beliefs and are supported by two pieces of evidence, but the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018, limits judges in making decisions.

Purposes of the Research: To analyze and discuss the freedom of judges in making decisions on a criminal act, as well as analyze and discuss the freedom of judges associated with the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018 in criminal acts of corruption.

Methods of the Research: The research is normative juridical, using primary and secondary legal materials.

Results of the Research: From the results Based on the results of the research, it was found that the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018 binds judges to, and restricts judges from making decisions, but there are judges who follow this circular letter and some do not follow the circular letter, according to with the amount of state losses arising from the corruption committed.

Keywords

Judge Freedom; Judgment; Criminal.

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664

Published

2021-10-30

How To Cite

APA: Pune, H., Toule, E.R., & Ubwarin, E. (2021). Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(7), 691 – 696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664.

IEEE: H. Pune, E.R. Toule, and E. Ubwarin, "Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 691 – 696, Oct. 2021. Accessed on: Apr. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664

Harvard: Pune, H., Toule, E.R., and Ubwarin, E., (2021). "Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(7), pp. 691 – 696. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664 (Accessed on: 27 April 2024)

Chicago: Pune, Hamdi, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, and Erwin Ubwarin. "Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 7 (October 30, 2021): 691 – 696. Accessed April 27, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664

Vancouver: Pune H, Toule ER, Ubwarin E. Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2021 Oct 30 [cited 2024 Apr 27];1(7):691 – 696. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664

MLA 8th: Pune, Hamdi, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, and Erwin Ubwarin. "Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 7, 30 Oct. 2021, pp. 691 – 696, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664. Accessed 27 Apr. 2024.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI664,
		author = {Hamdi Pune and Elsa Toule and Erwin Ubwarin},
		title = {Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan 	Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {7},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Judge Freedom; Judgment; Criminal.},
		abstract = {Introduction: Judges must be free to conduct legal considerations, and feel confident in what they are trying, so that they can impose sentences according to their beliefs and are supported by two pieces of evidence, but the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018, limits judges in making decisions.Purposes of the Research: To analyze and discuss the freedom of judges in making decisions on a criminal act, as well as analyze and discuss the freedom of judges associated with the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018 in criminal acts of corruption.Methods of the Research: The research is normative juridical, using primary and secondary legal materials.Results of the Research: From the results Based on the results of the research, it was found that the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018 binds judges to, and restricts judges from making decisions, but there are judges who follow this circular letter and some do not follow the circular letter, according to with the amount of state losses arising from the corruption committed.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {691--696}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/664}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Adji, Oemar Seno. Peradilan Bebas Negara Hukum. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1980.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum,. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016. https://doi.org/340.072.

Muhammad Fasabeni, SEMA tak sejalan dan Lemah Melawan Putusan MK, http://www.gresnews.com/berita/hukum/191101-sematak-sejalan-dan-lemah-melawan-putusan-mk/0/, gresnews

Suyatno. Korupsi Kolusi Dan Nepotisme. Bandung: Alumni, 1983.

Toule, Elsa R M. "Eksistensi Ancaman Pidana Mati Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi." Jurnal Hukum Prioris 3, no. 3 (2013): 103-10. https://trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/prioris/article/view/370.

Ubwarin, Erwin. "Disparitas Putusan Peradilan Negeri Dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Illegal Mining Batu Cinnabar." Bacarita Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2020): 38-53.

Ubwarin, Erwin, and Yonna Betrix Salamor. "Mekanisme Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Oleh Terpidana Yang Meninggal Dunia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-Xiv/2016." Urnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni 1, no. 1 (2017): 51-57. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i1.334.

https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i1.334

Full Text: PDF