Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan 	Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018

Hamdi Pune; Elsa Rina Maya Toule; Erwin Ubwarin

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664

Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018

Hamdi Pune⁽¹⁾, Elsa Rina Maya Toule⁽²⁾, Erwin Ubwarin⁽³⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: Judges must be free to conduct legal considerations, and feel confident in what they are trying, so that they can impose sentences according to their beliefs and are supported by two pieces of evidence, but the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018, limits judges in making decisions.

Purposes of the Research: To analyze and discuss the freedom of judges in making decisions on a criminal act, as well as analyze and discuss the freedom of judges associated with the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018 in criminal acts of corruption.

Methods of the Research: The research is normative juridical, using primary and secondary legal materials.

Results of the Research: From the results Based on the results of the research, it was found that the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018 binds judges to, and restricts judges from making decisions, but there are judges who follow this circular letter and some do not follow the circular letter, according to with the amount of state losses arising from the corruption committed.

Keywords

Judge Freedom; Judgment; Criminal.

DOI

10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664

Published

2021-10-30

How To Cite

APA: Pune, H., Toule, E.R., & Ubwarin, E. (2021). Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(7), 691 – 696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664.

IEEE: H. Pune, E.R. Toule, and E. Ubwarin, "Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 691 – 696, Oct. 2021. Accessed on: May. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664

Harvard: Pune, H., Toule, E.R., and Ubwarin, E., (2021). "Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(7), pp. 691 – 696. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664 (Accessed on: 15 May 2025)

Chicago: Pune, Hamdi, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, and Erwin Ubwarin. "Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 7 (October 30, 2021): 691 – 696. Accessed May 15, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664

Vancouver: Pune H, Toule ER, Ubwarin E. Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2021 Oct 30 [cited 2025 May 15];1(7):691 – 696. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664

MLA 8th: Pune, Hamdi, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, and Erwin Ubwarin. "Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 7, 30 Oct. 2021, pp. 691 – 696, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664. Accessed 15 May. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{TATOHI664,
		author = {Hamdi Pune and Elsa Toule and Erwin Ubwarin},
		title = {Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan 	Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {7},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Judge Freedom; Judgment; Criminal.},
		abstract = {Introduction: Judges must be free to conduct legal considerations, and feel confident in what they are trying, so that they can impose sentences according to their beliefs and are supported by two pieces of evidence, but the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018, limits judges in making decisions.Purposes of the Research: To analyze and discuss the freedom of judges in making decisions on a criminal act, as well as analyze and discuss the freedom of judges associated with the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018 in criminal acts of corruption.Methods of the Research: The research is normative juridical, using primary and secondary legal materials.Results of the Research: From the results Based on the results of the research, it was found that the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018 binds judges to, and restricts judges from making decisions, but there are judges who follow this circular letter and some do not follow the circular letter, according to with the amount of state losses arising from the corruption committed.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {691--696}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/664}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Adji, Oemar Seno. Peradilan Bebas Negara Hukum. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1980.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum,. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016. https://doi.org/340.072.

Muhammad Fasabeni, SEMA tak sejalan dan Lemah Melawan Putusan MK, http://www.gresnews.com/berita/hukum/191101-sematak-sejalan-dan-lemah-melawan-putusan-mk/0/, gresnews

Suyatno. Korupsi Kolusi Dan Nepotisme. Bandung: Alumni, 1983.

Toule, Elsa R M. "Eksistensi Ancaman Pidana Mati Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi." Jurnal Hukum Prioris 3, no. 3 (2013): 103-10. https://trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/prioris/article/view/370.

Ubwarin, Erwin. "Disparitas Putusan Peradilan Negeri Dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Illegal Mining Batu Cinnabar." Bacarita Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2020): 38-53.

Ubwarin, Erwin, and Yonna Betrix Salamor. "Mekanisme Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Oleh Terpidana Yang Meninggal Dunia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-Xiv/2016." Urnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni 1, no. 1 (2017): 51-57. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i1.334.

https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i1.334

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 1020 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 1582 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Hamdi Pune; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Elsa Rina Maya Toule; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Erwin Ubwarin; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Judge Freedom; Judgment; Criminal.

4.	Description	Abstract	Introduction: Judges must be free to conduct legal considerations, and feel confident in what they are trying, so that they can impose sentences according to their beliefs and are supported by two pieces of evidence, but the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018, limits judges in making decisions.Purposes of the Research: To analyze and discuss the freedom of judges in making decisions on a criminal act, as well as analyze and discuss the freedom of judges associated with the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018 in criminal acts of corruption.Methods of the Research: The research is normative juridical, using primary and secondary legal materials.Results of the Research: From the results Based on the results of the research, it was found that the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018 binds judges to, and restricts judges from making decisions, but there are judges who follow this circular letter and some do not follow the circular letter, according to with the amount of state losses arising from the corruption committed.

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law Pattimura University

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2021-10-30

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/664

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.664

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 7 (2021): Volume 1 Nomor 7, September 2021

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..