Pertimbangan Penyidik Dalam Penetapan Status Tersangka Dalam Kasus Video Porno

Oktovianus Nurlatu(1email), Elsa Rina Maya Toule(2), Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Determition of GA as a suspect in the case of his personal pornographic video, together with MYD, on GA social media, he was charged with the prohibition of article 4 paragrahp (1) of law number 44 of 2008 concerning pornography, article 4 paragraph (1) in its explanation of making and for its own sake. And GA is a victim, but in fact investigators set GA as a suspect.

Purposes of the Research: Explain about what is the basis for determining GA as a suspect in a porn video case and proving pornographic elements in the determination of GA as a suspect in a porn video case.

Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative juridical research. The approach to the problem used is a statutory approach that prioritizes legal materials and a case approach.

Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that it is based on preliminnary evidence, namely evidence of  GA’s confession and evidence of  a 19-second video clue that exists who  confirm that the person in the 19-second porn video is GA.that GA’s actions meet the qualifications of the elemens of article 4 paragraph (1) in conjunction with  article 29 of the pornography law, related to the elements of his actions, namely producing and making, as well as elemens of the object of his actions, namely making videos of sexual activities with MYD and fulfilling the qualifications of the elemens of article 8 juncto article 34 of the pornography law, namely subjective elements and objective elemens because they intentionally or with their consent become objects containing pornography law in the future,it can be emphasized so that in carrying  out law enforcement efforts related to pornograhy cases it will be better without violating the human rights of the community.

Keywords


Determination; Suspect; Porn Videos

How To Cite


APA: Nurlatu, O., Toule, E.R., & Latupeirissa, J.E. (2021). Pertimbangan Penyidik Dalam Penetapan Status Tersangka Dalam Kasus Video Porno. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(9), 928 – 942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.813.
IEEE: O. Nurlatu, E.R. Toule, and J.E. Latupeirissa, "Pertimbangan Penyidik Dalam Penetapan Status Tersangka Dalam Kasus Video Porno", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 928 – 942, Nov. 2021. Accessed on: Jan. 31, 2023. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.813
Harvard: Nurlatu, O., Toule, E.R., and Latupeirissa, J.E., (2021). "Pertimbangan Penyidik Dalam Penetapan Status Tersangka Dalam Kasus Video Porno". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(9), pp. 928 – 942. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.813 (Accessed on: 31 January 2023)
Chicago: Nurlatu, Oktovianus, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, and Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa. "Pertimbangan Penyidik Dalam Penetapan Status Tersangka Dalam Kasus Video Porno." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 9 (November 30, 2021): 928 – 942. Accessed January 31, 2023. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.813
Vancouver: Nurlatu O, Toule ER, Latupeirissa JE. Pertimbangan Penyidik Dalam Penetapan Status Tersangka Dalam Kasus Video Porno. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2021 Nov 30 [cited 2023 Jan 31];1(9):928 – 942. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.813
MLA 8th: Nurlatu, Oktovianus, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, and Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa. "Pertimbangan Penyidik Dalam Penetapan Status Tersangka Dalam Kasus Video Porno." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 9, 30 Nov. 2021, pp. 928 – 942, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.813. Accessed 31 Jan. 2023.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI813,
		author = {Oktovianus Nurlatu and Elsa Toule and Julianus Latupeirissa},
		title = {Pertimbangan Penyidik Dalam Penetapan Status Tersangka Dalam Kasus Video Porno},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {9},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Determination; Suspect; Porn Videos},
		abstract = {Introduction: Determition of GA as a suspect in the case of his personal pornographic video, together with MYD, on GA social media, he was charged with the prohibition of article 4 paragrahp (1) of law number 44 of 2008 concerning pornography, article 4 paragraph (1) in its explanation of making and for its own sake. And GA is a victim, but in fact investigators set GA as a suspect.Purposes of the Research: Explain about what is the basis for determining GA as a suspect in a porn video case and proving pornographic elements in the determination of GA as a suspect in a porn video case.Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative juridical research. The approach to the problem used is a statutory approach that prioritizes legal materials and a case approach.Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that it is based on preliminnary evidence, namely evidence of  GA’s confession and evidence of  a 19-second video clue that exists who  confirm that the person in the 19-second porn video is GA.that GA’s actions meet the qualifications of the elemens of article 4 paragraph (1) in conjunction with  article 29 of the pornography law, related to the elements of his actions, namely producing and making, as well as elemens of the object of his actions, namely making videos of sexual activities with MYD and fulfilling the qualifications of the elemens of article 8 juncto article 34 of the pornography law, namely subjective elements and objective elemens because they intentionally or with their consent become objects containing pornography law in the future,it can be emphasized so that in carrying  out law enforcement efforts related to pornograhy cases it will be better without violating the human rights of the community.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {928--942}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.813},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/813}
		}
		
RefWorks:

Citation format: 


Ariman, Rasyid, and Fahmi Raghib. Hukum Pidana. Malang: Setara Press, 2016.

Asti, Badiatul Muchlisin. Remaja Dirantai Birahi: Kupas Tuntas Pornografi Dalam Perspektif Islam. Bandung: Pustaka Ulumuddin, 2004.

Chaniago, Aldilla Renata. "Tindak Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Penyebar Video Porno Melalui Internet Yang Dilakukan Individu Di Indonesia." Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 1, no. 1 (2017): 52-62.

Harun, M. Husein. Penyidik Dan Penuntut Dalam Proses Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1991.

Ihsanudin. "Kasus Gisel, Kenapa Pembuat Video Syur Bisa Dijerat Pidana?" Kompas.com, 2020. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2020/12/30/05572621/kasus-gisel-kenapa-pembuat-video-syur-bisa-dijerat-pidana?page=all#:~:text=Abdul Fickar mengakui%2C Gisel dan,itu tersebar luas ke publik.

Lamintang, P.A.F. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Adya Bakti, 2011.

Latupeirissa, Julianus Edwin, Jacob Hattu, and Elias Zadrach Leasa. "Penanganan Tindak Pidana Yang Dikualifikasi Delik Aduan." Jurnal Belo 5, no. 2 (2020): 21-33.
https://doi.org/10.30598/belobelovol5issue2page21-33

Lindsey, Tim, and Helen Pausacker. Crime and Punishment in Indonesia. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429455247

Mardatillah, Aida. "Lebih Berhati-Hati Untuk Jerat Korban Dalam Kasus Video Asusila." hukumonline.com, 2021. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/lebih-berhati-hati-untuk-jerat-korban-dalam-kasus-video-asusila-lt5ffbefb0c4027.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum,. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016. https://doi.org/340.072.

Mustafa, Azka Zaki. "Usai Membuat Video Syur 19 Detik, Gisel Mengaku Kirim Rekaman Ke MYD Via AirDrop." Pikiran Rakyat Bekasi.com, 2020. https://bekasi.pikiran-rakyat.com/entertainment/pr-121189257/usai-membuat-video-syur-19-detik-gisel-mengaku-kirim-rekaman-ke-myd-via-airdrop?page=2.

RiauPos.Co. "Ini Penjelasan Ahli Hukum Pidana Soal Kasus Gisel." RiauPos.Co, 2020. https://riaupos.jawapos.com/hukum/29/12/2020/243816/ini-penjelasan-ahli-hukum-pidana-soal-kasus-gisel.html.

Sahetapy, J E. Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1995.

Simanjuntak, Theresia Ruth. "Kasus Video Syur, Ini Penjelasan Pasal UU Pornografi Yang Menjerat Gisel." Kompas.com, 2020. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2020/12/29/18452841/kasus-video-syur-ini-penjelasan-pasal-uu-pornografi-yang-menjerat-gisel?page=all.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 5110 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 959 times



DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.813

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Oktovianus Nurlatu, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.