Pertimbangan Penyidik Dalam Penetapan Status Tersangka Dalam Kasus Video Porno
), Elsa Rina Maya Toule(2), Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Determition of GA as a suspect in the case of his personal pornographic video, together with MYD, on GA social media, he was charged with the prohibition of article 4 paragrahp (1) of law number 44 of 2008 concerning pornography, article 4 paragraph (1) in its explanation of making and for its own sake. And GA is a victim, but in fact investigators set GA as a suspect.
Purposes of the Research: Explain about what is the basis for determining GA as a suspect in a porn video case and proving pornographic elements in the determination of GA as a suspect in a porn video case.
Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative juridical research. The approach to the problem used is a statutory approach that prioritizes legal materials and a case approach.
Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that it is based on preliminnary evidence, namely evidence of GA’s confession and evidence of a 19-second video clue that exists who confirm that the person in the 19-second porn video is GA.that GA’s actions meet the qualifications of the elemens of article 4 paragraph (1) in conjunction with article 29 of the pornography law, related to the elements of his actions, namely producing and making, as well as elemens of the object of his actions, namely making videos of sexual activities with MYD and fulfilling the qualifications of the elemens of article 8 juncto article 34 of the pornography law, namely subjective elements and objective elemens because they intentionally or with their consent become objects containing pornography law in the future,it can be emphasized so that in carrying out law enforcement efforts related to pornograhy cases it will be better without violating the human rights of the community.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.813
Published
2021-11-30
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI813,
author = {Oktovianus Nurlatu and Elsa Toule and Julianus Latupeirissa},
title = {Pertimbangan Penyidik Dalam Penetapan Status Tersangka Dalam Kasus Video Porno},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {1},
number = {9},
year = {2021},
keywords = {Determination; Suspect; Porn Videos},
abstract = {Introduction: Determition of GA as a suspect in the case of his personal pornographic video, together with MYD, on GA social media, he was charged with the prohibition of article 4 paragrahp (1) of law number 44 of 2008 concerning pornography, article 4 paragraph (1) in its explanation of making and for its own sake. And GA is a victim, but in fact investigators set GA as a suspect.Purposes of the Research: Explain about what is the basis for determining GA as a suspect in a porn video case and proving pornographic elements in the determination of GA as a suspect in a porn video case.Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative juridical research. The approach to the problem used is a statutory approach that prioritizes legal materials and a case approach.Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that it is based on preliminnary evidence, namely evidence of GA’s confession and evidence of a 19-second video clue that exists who confirm that the person in the 19-second porn video is GA.that GA’s actions meet the qualifications of the elemens of article 4 paragraph (1) in conjunction with article 29 of the pornography law, related to the elements of his actions, namely producing and making, as well as elemens of the object of his actions, namely making videos of sexual activities with MYD and fulfilling the qualifications of the elemens of article 8 juncto article 34 of the pornography law, namely subjective elements and objective elemens because they intentionally or with their consent become objects containing pornography law in the future,it can be emphasized so that in carrying out law enforcement efforts related to pornograhy cases it will be better without violating the human rights of the community.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {928--942} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.813},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/813}
}
Ariman, Rasyid, and Fahmi Raghib. Hukum Pidana. Malang: Setara Press, 2016.
Asti, Badiatul Muchlisin. Remaja Dirantai Birahi: Kupas Tuntas Pornografi Dalam Perspektif Islam. Bandung: Pustaka Ulumuddin, 2004.
Chaniago, Aldilla Renata. "Tindak Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Penyebar Video Porno Melalui Internet Yang Dilakukan Individu Di Indonesia." Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 1, no. 1 (2017): 52-62.
Harun, M. Husein. Penyidik Dan Penuntut Dalam Proses Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1991.
Ihsanudin. "Kasus Gisel, Kenapa Pembuat Video Syur Bisa Dijerat Pidana?" Kompas.com, 2020. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2020/12/30/05572621/kasus-gisel-kenapa-pembuat-video-syur-bisa-dijerat-pidana?page=all#:~:text=Abdul Fickar mengakui%2C Gisel dan,itu tersebar luas ke publik.
Lamintang, P.A.F. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Adya Bakti, 2011.
Latupeirissa, Julianus Edwin, Jacob Hattu, and Elias Zadrach Leasa. "Penanganan Tindak Pidana Yang Dikualifikasi Delik Aduan." Jurnal Belo 5, no. 2 (2020): 21-33.
https://doi.org/10.30598/belobelovol5issue2page21-33
Lindsey, Tim, and Helen Pausacker. Crime and Punishment in Indonesia. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429455247
Mardatillah, Aida. "Lebih Berhati-Hati Untuk Jerat Korban Dalam Kasus Video Asusila." hukumonline.com, 2021. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/lebih-berhati-hati-untuk-jerat-korban-dalam-kasus-video-asusila-lt5ffbefb0c4027.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum,. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016. https://doi.org/340.072.
Mustafa, Azka Zaki. "Usai Membuat Video Syur 19 Detik, Gisel Mengaku Kirim Rekaman Ke MYD Via AirDrop." Pikiran Rakyat Bekasi.com, 2020. https://bekasi.pikiran-rakyat.com/entertainment/pr-121189257/usai-membuat-video-syur-19-detik-gisel-mengaku-kirim-rekaman-ke-myd-via-airdrop?page=2.
RiauPos.Co. "Ini Penjelasan Ahli Hukum Pidana Soal Kasus Gisel." RiauPos.Co, 2020. https://riaupos.jawapos.com/hukum/29/12/2020/243816/ini-penjelasan-ahli-hukum-pidana-soal-kasus-gisel.html.
Sahetapy, J E. Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1995.
Simanjuntak, Theresia Ruth. "Kasus Video Syur, Ini Penjelasan Pasal UU Pornografi Yang Menjerat Gisel." Kompas.com, 2020. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2020/12/29/18452841/kasus-video-syur-ini-penjelasan-pasal-uu-pornografi-yang-menjerat-gisel?page=all.
: 6598 times
Download : 1551 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Pertimbangan Penyidik Dalam Penetapan Status Tersangka Dalam Kasus Video Porno |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Oktovianus Nurlatu; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Elsa Rina Maya Toule; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Determination; Suspect; Porn Videos |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: Determition of GA as a suspect in the case of his personal pornographic video, together with MYD, on GA social media, he was charged with the prohibition of article 4 paragrahp (1) of law number 44 of 2008 concerning pornography, article 4 paragraph (1) in its explanation of making and for its own sake. And GA is a victim, but in fact investigators set GA as a suspect.Purposes of the Research: Explain about what is the basis for determining GA as a suspect in a porn video case and proving pornographic elements in the determination of GA as a suspect in a porn video case.Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative juridical research. The approach to the problem used is a statutory approach that prioritizes legal materials and a case approach.Results of the Research: Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that it is based on preliminnary evidence, namely evidence of GA’s confession and evidence of a 19-second video clue that exists who confirm that the person in the 19-second porn video is GA.that GA’s actions meet the qualifications of the elemens of article 4 paragraph (1) in conjunction with article 29 of the pornography law, related to the elements of his actions, namely producing and making, as well as elemens of the object of his actions, namely making videos of sexual activities with MYD and fulfilling the qualifications of the elemens of article 8 juncto article 34 of the pornography law, namely subjective elements and objective elemens because they intentionally or with their consent become objects containing pornography law in the future,it can be emphasized so that in carrying out law enforcement efforts related to pornograhy cases it will be better without violating the human rights of the community. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law Pattimura University |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2021-11-30 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/813 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.813 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 9 (2021): Volume 1 Nomor 9, November 2021 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Oktovianus Nurlatu, Elsa Rina Maya Toule, Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
