Pelaksanaan Jaminan Fidusia Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19
), Rory Jeff Akyuwen(2), Sarah Selfina Kuahaty(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The case of Credit Agreement and Debt Recognition with a fiduciary guarantee that occurred between Roberth Gomies as a debtor and PT. Sinar Mas Multifinance (PT. SMMF) as a creditor with a guarantee of 1 (one) unit of Public Transport Vehicle. In this case, the payment made by Robert Gomies experienced a payment delay due to the corona virus outbreak 19. So the vehicle used as credit collateral in the fiduciary agreement was forcibly/unilaterally withdrawn without the knowledge and permission of the debtor.
Purposes of the Research: Knowing and Reviewing Forms of Protection for Fiduciary Guarantees in the Covid 19 Pandemic Period and Execution Mechanisms for Fiduciary Guarantees in the Covid 19 Pandemic Period.
Methods of the Research: The method used is normative legal research. The research approach is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is through literature study and then analyzed through a perspective using qualitative methods.
Results of the Research: The results of the study show that the procedure for withdrawing the object of fiduciary security must refer to the Regulation of the National Police Chief Number 8 of 2011 which is carried out by the creditor or his proxies must submit a request for securing the execution of the withdrawal of the fiduciary object which is made in writing addressed to the local police chief by attaching the following conditions: the following conditions, a. a copy of the fiduciary guarantee deed, b. a copy of the fiduciary guarantee certificate, c. A warning letter to the debtor to fulfill his obligations. d. The identity of the executor of the execution, e. Executioner's assignment letter. In addition, the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 has also provided legal certainty for fiduciary guarantee.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v1i10.861
Published
2021-12-24
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI861,
author = {Revandio Moenandar and Rory Akyuwen and Sarah Kuahaty},
title = {Pelaksanaan Jaminan Fidusia Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {1},
number = {10},
year = {2021},
keywords = {Legal Protection; Fiduciary Guarantee; Covid 19 Pandemic},
abstract = {Introduction: The case of Credit Agreement and Debt Recognition with a fiduciary guarantee that occurred between Roberth Gomies as a debtor and PT. Sinar Mas Multifinance (PT. SMMF) as a creditor with a guarantee of 1 (one) unit of Public Transport Vehicle. In this case, the payment made by Robert Gomies experienced a payment delay due to the corona virus outbreak 19. So the vehicle used as credit collateral in the fiduciary agreement was forcibly/unilaterally withdrawn without the knowledge and permission of the debtor.Purposes of the Research: Knowing and Reviewing Forms of Protection for Fiduciary Guarantees in the Covid 19 Pandemic Period and Execution Mechanisms for Fiduciary Guarantees in the Covid 19 Pandemic Period. Methods of the Research: The method used is normative legal research. The research approach is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is through literature study and then analyzed through a perspective using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The results of the study show that the procedure for withdrawing the object of fiduciary security must refer to the Regulation of the National Police Chief Number 8 of 2011 which is carried out by the creditor or his proxies must submit a request for securing the execution of the withdrawal of the fiduciary object which is made in writing addressed to the local police chief by attaching the following conditions: the following conditions, a. a copy of the fiduciary guarantee deed, b. a copy of the fiduciary guarantee certificate, c. A warning letter to the debtor to fulfill his obligations. d. The identity of the executor of the execution, e. Executioner's assignment letter. In addition, the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 has also provided legal certainty for fiduciary guarantee.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {1025--1036} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i10.861},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/861}
}
Arjaya, I Made, and Nyoman Putra Suhambara. “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Benda Bergerak Yang Tidak Dibebani Jaminan Fidusia Di Perkoperasian.” Batulis Civil Law Review 2, no. 2 (2021): 140–51. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i2.689.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014.
Budi, Setia. “Permohonan Eksekusi Kepada Pengadilan Negeri Berkaitan Dengan Perjanjian Fidusia Terhadap Jaminan Yang Digelapkan.” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 3, no. 1 (2017): 99–107. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v3i1.15.
Dewi, Retno Puspo, Nor Saptanti, and Hari Purwadi. “Kekuatan Eksekutorial Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Berdasar Undang Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusi.” Jurnal Repertorium 4, no. 1 (2017): 73–81.
Harahap, M Yahya. Ruang Lingkung Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1988.
Hetharie, Yosia. “Default in Sea Transportation Agreement.” Law Research Review Quarterly 6, no. 2 (2020): 181–84. https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v6i2.37900.
Isradjuningtias, Agri Chairunisa. “Force Majeure (Overmacht) Dalam Hukum Kontrak (Perjanjian) Indonesia.” Veritas et Justitia 1, no. 1 (2015): 136–58.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. “Stimulus Perekonomian Nasional Sebagai Kebijakan Countercyclical Dampak Penyebaran Coronavirus Disease 2019.” ojk.go.id, 2020. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Pages/Stimulus-Perekonomian-Nasional-Sebagai-Kebijakan-Countercyclical-Dampak-Penyebaran-Coronavirus-Disease-2019.aspx.
Ridwan HR. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2018.
Saliman, Abdul R. Esensi Hukum Bisnis Indonesia: Teori & Contoh Kasus. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2004.
Sari, Ferrika. “Pendapatan Industri Multifinance Capai Rp 107,78 Triliun Pada 2018.” kontan.co.id, 2019. https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/pendapatan-industri-multifinance-capai-rp-10778-triliun-pada-2018.
Tjoanda, Merry. “Karakteristik Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia.” Batulis Civil Law Review 1, no. 1 (2020): 47–53. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.424.
Tjoanda, Merry, Yosia Hetharie, Marselo Valentino Geovani Pariela, and Ronald Fadly Sopamena. “Covid-19 Sebagai Bentuk Overmacht Dan Akibat Hukumnya Terhadap Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kredit.” SASI 27, no. 1 (2021): 93–101. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.447.
: 1108 times
Download : 1186 times
| Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Pelaksanaan Jaminan Fidusia Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Revandio Hendruno Moenandar; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Rory Jeff Akyuwen; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Sarah Selfina Kuahaty; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Legal Protection; Fiduciary Guarantee; Covid 19 Pandemic |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: The case of Credit Agreement and Debt Recognition with a fiduciary guarantee that occurred between Roberth Gomies as a debtor and PT. Sinar Mas Multifinance (PT. SMMF) as a creditor with a guarantee of 1 (one) unit of Public Transport Vehicle. In this case, the payment made by Robert Gomies experienced a payment delay due to the corona virus outbreak 19. So the vehicle used as credit collateral in the fiduciary agreement was forcibly/unilaterally withdrawn without the knowledge and permission of the debtor.Purposes of the Research: Knowing and Reviewing Forms of Protection for Fiduciary Guarantees in the Covid 19 Pandemic Period and Execution Mechanisms for Fiduciary Guarantees in the Covid 19 Pandemic Period. Methods of the Research: The method used is normative legal research. The research approach is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is through literature study and then analyzed through a perspective using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: The results of the study show that the procedure for withdrawing the object of fiduciary security must refer to the Regulation of the National Police Chief Number 8 of 2011 which is carried out by the creditor or his proxies must submit a request for securing the execution of the withdrawal of the fiduciary object which is made in writing addressed to the local police chief by attaching the following conditions: the following conditions, a. a copy of the fiduciary guarantee deed, b. a copy of the fiduciary guarantee certificate, c. A warning letter to the debtor to fulfill his obligations. d. The identity of the executor of the execution, e. Executioner's assignment letter. In addition, the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 has also provided legal certainty for fiduciary guarantee. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law Pattimura University |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2021-12-24 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/861 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/tatohi.v1i10.861 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 10 (2021): Volume 1 Nomor 10, Desember 2021 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Revandio Hendruno Moenandar, Rory Jeff Akyuwen, Sarah Selfina Kuahaty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
