Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)
), Efie Baadila(2), Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw(3)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: Diplomatic representatives who abuse this authority because of their inherent rights of immunity and immunity.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to identify and understand the responsibilities of diplomatic officials who commit acts of abuse of authority in the receiving country according to the 1961 Vienna Convention and to identify and understand the state's responsibility to diplomatic officials who commit acts of abuse of authority in the receiving country.
Methods of the Research: This study uses normative legal research methods, using primary, secondary, tertiary legal sources and the collection of legal materials is carried out using library research. Furthermore, the analysis technique uses qualitative analysis and is presented descriptively, namely analyzing the legal material obtained based on the legal rules and to identify and conclude the results of the analysis in accordance with the problems raised.
Results of the Research: The form of responsibility of a diplomatic representative or diplomatic official who abuses his authority in the country receiving the diplomatic official can receive consequences in Persona Non Grata, the immunities and privileges of diplomatic officials are removed and the sending country is recalled for trial. Forms of state accountability that can be carried out by North Korea (sending country) to Bangladesh (receiving country) include compensation and satisfaction. Compensation is a form of state responsibility in the form of money payments given due to material losses due to the actions of diplomatic officials who abuse their powers. While satisfaction is a form of state responsibility by apologizing for the actions of its diplomatic officials.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/tatohi.v1i12.874
Published
2022-02-28
How To Cite
@article{TATOHI874,
author = {Tasya Rahim and Efie Baadila and Johanis Peilouw},
title = {Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)},
journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
volume = {1},
number = {12},
year = {2022},
keywords = {Responsibility; Dplomatic Representative; Abuse of Authority.},
abstract = {Introduction: Diplomatic representatives who abuse this authority because of their inherent rights of immunity and immunity.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to identify and understand the responsibilities of diplomatic officials who commit acts of abuse of authority in the receiving country according to the 1961 Vienna Convention and to identify and understand the state's responsibility to diplomatic officials who commit acts of abuse of authority in the receiving country. Methods of the Research: This study uses normative legal research methods, using primary, secondary, tertiary legal sources and the collection of legal materials is carried out using library research. Furthermore, the analysis technique uses qualitative analysis and is presented descriptively, namely analyzing the legal material obtained based on the legal rules and to identify and conclude the results of the analysis in accordance with the problems raised.Results of the Research: The form of responsibility of a diplomatic representative or diplomatic official who abuses his authority in the country receiving the diplomatic official can receive consequences in Persona Non Grata, the immunities and privileges of diplomatic officials are removed and the sending country is recalled for trial. Forms of state accountability that can be carried out by North Korea (sending country) to Bangladesh (receiving country) include compensation and satisfaction. Compensation is a form of state responsibility in the form of money payments given due to material losses due to the actions of diplomatic officials who abuse their powers. While satisfaction is a form of state responsibility by apologizing for the actions of its diplomatic officials.},
issn = {2775-619X}, pages = {1168--1185} doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i12.874},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/874}
}
A K, Syahmin. Hukum Diplomatik Dalam Kerangka Studi Dan Analisis. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2008.
Anggraini, Cathy, Peni Susetyorini, and Kholis Roisah. “Penyalahgunaan Hak Kekebalan Diplomatik Ditinjau Dari Konvensi Wina 1961 (Studi Kasus Penyelundupan Emas Oleh Pejabat Diplom Atik Korea Utara Di Bangladesh).” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 3 (2016): 1–17.
Briggs, H.W. The Law Of Nation. New York: Century Crofts, 1968.
Chowdhury, Syed Tashfin. “North Korea Apologizes After Diplomat Caught Smuggling $1.4M of Gold into Bangladesh.” vice.com, 2015. https://www.vice.com/en/article/3ke39n/north-korea-apologizes-after-diplomat-caught-smuggling-14m-of-gold-into-bangladesh.
Dammen, Nicholas Tandi. “Kewenangan Perwakilan RI Di Luar Negeri.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 2, no. 4 (2005): 710–26.
Hadadi, Muhammad Fahmi. “Analisis Tindakan Pemerintah Bangladesh Yang Memeriksa Tas Diplomatik Son Young Nam Sekretaris I Korea Utara Untuk Bangladesh Di Bandara Dhaka Ditinjau Dari Konvensi Wina 1961.” Universitas Surabaya, 2019.
https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/19432/penyalahgunaan-hak-kekebalan-diplomatik-ditinjau-dari-konvensi-wina-1961-studi-kasus-penyulundupan-emas -oleh-pejabat-diplomatik-korea-utara-di-bangladesh
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spionase
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spionase
Kansil, C.S.T. Hubungan Diplomatik Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1988.
Khan, Moinul. “Bangladesh Expels North Korean Diplomat for Smuggling.” aljazeera.com, 2016. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/8/8/bangladesh-expels-north-korean-diplomat-for-smuggling.
Mangku, Dewa Gede Sudika, Nyoman Tia Resita Dewi, and I Wayan Lasmawan. “Akibat Hukum Atas Penyalahgunaan Hak Kekebalan Diplomatik Ditinjau Dari Konvensi Wina 1961 (Studi Kasus Penyeludupan Emas Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pejabat Diplomatik Korea Utara Di Bangladesh).” Justitia Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 2 (2020): 221–36.
Matanews.com/2020/03/31/liga-arab-tolak-surat-icc
Nasution, M Sanwani. “Pengantar Hukum Internasional Dalam Hubungan Diplomatik.” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera, 1980.
Pandean, Claudya Gladys. “Hak Dan Kewajiban Hukum Negara Penerima Terhadap Diplomat Menurut Konvensi Wina Tahun 1961.” Lex Privatum 4, no. 4 (2016): 111–18.
Poeteri, Olivia Razmana, Djoko Susilo, and Suyani Indriastuti. “Pemutusan Hubungan Diplomatik Kanada Terhadap Iran.” Repository.Unej.Ac.Id. Jember, 2013. https://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/59093.
Starke, J G. Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.
Suryokusumo, Sumaryo. Hukum Diplomatik Dan Konsuler. Jakarta: Tatanusa, 2013.
———. Hukum Diplomatik Teori Dan Kasus. Bandung: Alumni, 1995.
———. Pratik Diplomasi. Bandung: BP. IBLAM, 2004.
Suryono, Edy, and Moenir Arisoendha. Hukum Diplomatik : Kekebalan Dan Keistimewaannya. Bandung: Angkasa, 1991.
Syahmin, Syahmin. Hukum Diplomatik Suatu Pengantar. Palembang: Armico, 1985.
Widgago, Setyo, and Hanifa Nur W. Hukum Diplomatik Dan Konsuler. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2008.
Yusuf, Suffry. Hubungan Internasional Dan Politik Luar Negeri. Jakarta: Pustaka Harapan, 1989.
: 1903 times
Download : 8961 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Tasya Rahim, Efie Baadila, Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
