Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)

Tasya Rahim(1email), Efie Baadila(2), Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Diplomatic representatives who abuse this authority because of their inherent rights of immunity and immunity.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to identify and understand the responsibilities of diplomatic officials who commit acts of abuse of authority in the receiving country according to the 1961 Vienna Convention and to identify and understand the state's responsibility to diplomatic officials who commit acts of abuse of authority in the receiving country. Methods of the Research: This study uses normative legal research methods, using primary, secondary, tertiary legal sources and the collection of legal materials is carried out using library research. Furthermore, the analysis technique uses qualitative analysis and is presented descriptively, namely analyzing the legal material obtained based on the legal rules and to identify and conclude the results of the analysis in accordance with the problems raised.Results of the Research: The form of responsibility of a diplomatic representative or diplomatic official who abuses his authority in the country receiving the diplomatic official can receive consequences in Persona Non Grata, the immunities and privileges of diplomatic officials are removed and the sending country is recalled for trial. Forms of state accountability that can be carried out by North Korea (sending country) to Bangladesh (receiving country) include compensation and satisfaction. Compensation is a form of state responsibility in the form of money payments given due to material losses due to the actions of diplomatic officials who abuse their powers. While satisfaction is a form of state responsibility by apologizing for the actions of its diplomatic officials.

Keywords


Responsibility; Dplomatic Representative; Abuse of Authority.

How To Cite


APA: Rahim, T., Baadila, E., & Peilouw, J.S. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State). TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(12), 1168–1185. https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/874
IEEE: T. Rahim, E. Baadila, and J.S. Peilouw, "Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 1168–1185, Feb. 2022. Accessed on: Oct. 7, 2022. [Online]. Available at: https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/874
Harvard: Rahim, T., Baadila, E., and Peilouw, J.S., (2022). "Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(12), pp. 1168–1185. [Online]. Available at: https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/874 (Accessed on: 7 October 2022)
Chicago: Rahim, Tasya, Efie Baadila, and Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw. "Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 12 (February 28, 2022): 1168–1185. Accessed October 7, 2022. https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/874
Vancouver: Rahim T, Baadila E, Peilouw JS. Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State). TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Feb 28 [cited 2022 Oct 7];1(12):1168–1185. Available from: https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/874
MLA 8th: Rahim, Tasya, Efie Baadila, and Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw. "Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 12, 28 Feb. 2022, pp. 1168–1185, https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/874. Accessed 7 Oct. 2022.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI874,
		author = {Tasya Rahim and Efie Baadila and Johanis Peilouw},
		title = {Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {12},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Responsibility; Dplomatic Representative; Abuse of Authority.},
		abstract = {Introduction: Diplomatic representatives who abuse this authority because of their inherent rights of immunity and immunity.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to identify and understand the responsibilities of diplomatic officials who commit acts of abuse of authority in the receiving country according to the 1961 Vienna Convention and to identify and understand the state's responsibility to diplomatic officials who commit acts of abuse of authority in the receiving country. Methods of the Research: This study uses normative legal research methods, using primary, secondary, tertiary legal sources and the collection of legal materials is carried out using library research. Furthermore, the analysis technique uses qualitative analysis and is presented descriptively, namely analyzing the legal material obtained based on the legal rules and to identify and conclude the results of the analysis in accordance with the problems raised.Results of the Research: The form of responsibility of a diplomatic representative or diplomatic official who abuses his authority in the country receiving the diplomatic official can receive consequences in Persona Non Grata, the immunities and privileges of diplomatic officials are removed and the sending country is recalled for trial. Forms of state accountability that can be carried out by North Korea (sending country) to Bangladesh (receiving country) include compensation and satisfaction. Compensation is a form of state responsibility in the form of money payments given due to material losses due to the actions of diplomatic officials who abuse their powers. While satisfaction is a form of state responsibility by apologizing for the actions of its diplomatic officials.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {1168--1185}				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/874}
		}
		
RefWorks:

Citation format: 


A K, Syahmin. Hukum Diplomatik Dalam Kerangka Studi Dan Analisis. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2008.Anggraini, Cathy, Peni Susetyorini, and Kholis Roisah. “Penyalahgunaan Hak Kekebalan Diplomatik Ditinjau Dari Konvensi Wina 1961 (Studi Kasus Penyelundupan Emas Oleh Pejabat Diplom Atik Korea Utara Di Bangladesh).” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 3 (2016): 1–17.Briggs, H.W. The Law Of Nation. New York: Century Crofts, 1968.Chowdhury, Syed Tashfin. “North Korea Apologizes After Diplomat Caught Smuggling $1.4M of Gold into Bangladesh.” vice.com, 2015. https://www.vice.com/en/article/3ke39n/north-korea-apologizes-after-diplomat-caught-smuggling-14m-of-gold-into-bangladesh.Dammen, Nicholas Tandi. “Kewenangan Perwakilan RI Di Luar Negeri.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 2, no. 4 (2005): 710–26.Hadadi, Muhammad Fahmi. “Analisis Tindakan Pemerintah Bangladesh Yang Memeriksa Tas Diplomatik Son Young Nam Sekretaris I Korea Utara Untuk Bangladesh Di Bandara Dhaka Ditinjau Dari Konvensi Wina 1961.” Universitas Surabaya, 2019.https://news.vice.com/article/north-koreaapologizes-after-diplomat-caught-smuggling-14mof-gold-into-bangladeshhttps://www.neliti.com/id/publications/19432/penyalahgunaan-hak-kekebalan-diplomatik-ditinjau-dari-konvensi-wina-1961-studi-kasus-penyulundupan-emas -oleh-pejabat-diplomatik-korea-utara-di-bangladeshhttps://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spionasehttps://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpionaseKansil, C.S.T. Hubungan Diplomatik Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1988.Khan, Moinul. “Bangladesh Expels North Korean Diplomat for Smuggling.” aljazeera.com, 2016. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/8/8/bangladesh-expels-north-korean-diplomat-for-smuggling.Mangku, Dewa Gede Sudika, Nyoman Tia Resita Dewi, and I Wayan Lasmawan. “Akibat Hukum Atas Penyalahgunaan Hak Kekebalan Diplomatik Ditinjau Dari Konvensi Wina 1961 (Studi Kasus Penyeludupan Emas Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pejabat Diplomatik Korea Utara Di Bangladesh).” Justitia Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 2 (2020): 221–36.Matanews.com/2020/03/31/liga-arab-tolak-surat-iccNasution, M Sanwani. “Pengantar Hukum Internasional Dalam Hubungan Diplomatik.” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera, 1980.Pandean, Claudya Gladys. “Hak Dan Kewajiban Hukum Negara Penerima Terhadap Diplomat Menurut Konvensi Wina Tahun 1961.” Lex Privatum 4, no. 4 (2016): 111–18.Poeteri, Olivia Razmana, Djoko Susilo, and Suyani Indriastuti. “Pemutusan Hubungan Diplomatik Kanada Terhadap Iran.” Repository.Unej.Ac.Id. Jember, 2013. https://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/59093.Starke, J G. Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.Suryokusumo, Sumaryo. Hukum Diplomatik Dan Konsuler. Jakarta: Tatanusa, 2013.———. Hukum Diplomatik Teori Dan Kasus. Bandung: Alumni, 1995.———. Pratik Diplomasi. Bandung: BP. IBLAM, 2004.Suryono, Edy, and Moenir Arisoendha. Hukum Diplomatik : Kekebalan Dan Keistimewaannya. Bandung: Angkasa, 1991.Syahmin, Syahmin. Hukum Diplomatik Suatu Pengantar. Palembang: Armico, 1985.Widgago, Setyo, and Hanifa Nur W. Hukum Diplomatik Dan Konsuler. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2008.Yusuf, Suffry. Hubungan Internasional Dan Politik Luar Negeri. Jakarta: Pustaka Harapan, 1989.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 127 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 219 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Tasya Rahim, Efie Baadila, Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.