Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)

Tasya Rahim(1email), Efie Baadila(2), Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: Diplomatic representatives who abuse this authority because of their inherent rights of immunity and immunity.

Purposes of the Research: This study aims to identify and understand the responsibilities of diplomatic officials who commit acts of abuse of authority in the receiving country according to the 1961 Vienna Convention and to identify and understand the state's responsibility to diplomatic officials who commit acts of abuse of authority in the receiving country.

 

Methods of the Research: This study uses normative legal research methods, using primary, secondary, tertiary legal sources and the collection of legal materials is carried out using library research. Furthermore, the analysis technique uses qualitative analysis and is presented descriptively, namely analyzing the legal material obtained based on the legal rules and to identify and conclude the results of the analysis in accordance with the problems raised.

Results of the Research: The form of responsibility of a diplomatic representative or diplomatic official who abuses his authority in the country receiving the diplomatic official can receive consequences in Persona Non Grata, the immunities and privileges of diplomatic officials are removed and the sending country is recalled for trial. Forms of state accountability that can be carried out by North Korea (sending country) to Bangladesh (receiving country) include compensation and satisfaction. Compensation is a form of state responsibility in the form of money payments given due to material losses due to the actions of diplomatic officials who abuse their powers. While satisfaction is a form of state responsibility by apologizing for the actions of its diplomatic officials.

Keywords


Responsibility; Dplomatic Representative; Abuse of Authority.


DOI


10.47268/tatohi.v1i12.874

Published


2022-02-28

How To Cite


APA: Rahim, T., Baadila, E., & Peilouw, J.S. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State). TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(12), 1168–1185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i12.874.
IEEE: T. Rahim, E. Baadila, and J.S. Peilouw, "Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 1168–1185, Feb. 2022. Accessed on: May. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i12.874
Harvard: Rahim, T., Baadila, E., and Peilouw, J.S., (2022). "Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 1(12), pp. 1168–1185. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i12.874 (Accessed on: 13 May 2025)
Chicago: Rahim, Tasya, Efie Baadila, and Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw. "Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 12 (February 28, 2022): 1168–1185. Accessed May 13, 2025. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i12.874
Vancouver: Rahim T, Baadila E, Peilouw JS. Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State). TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Feb 28 [cited 2025 May 13];1(12):1168–1185. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i12.874
MLA 8th: Rahim, Tasya, Efie Baadila, and Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw. "Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 12, 28 Feb. 2022, pp. 1168–1185, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v1i12.874. Accessed 13 May. 2025.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI874,
		author = {Tasya Rahim and Efie Baadila and Johanis Peilouw},
		title = {Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {1},
		number = {12},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Responsibility; Dplomatic Representative; Abuse of Authority.},
		abstract = {Introduction: Diplomatic representatives who abuse this authority because of their inherent rights of immunity and immunity.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to identify and understand the responsibilities of diplomatic officials who commit acts of abuse of authority in the receiving country according to the 1961 Vienna Convention and to identify and understand the state's responsibility to diplomatic officials who commit acts of abuse of authority in the receiving country. Methods of the Research: This study uses normative legal research methods, using primary, secondary, tertiary legal sources and the collection of legal materials is carried out using library research. Furthermore, the analysis technique uses qualitative analysis and is presented descriptively, namely analyzing the legal material obtained based on the legal rules and to identify and conclude the results of the analysis in accordance with the problems raised.Results of the Research: The form of responsibility of a diplomatic representative or diplomatic official who abuses his authority in the country receiving the diplomatic official can receive consequences in Persona Non Grata, the immunities and privileges of diplomatic officials are removed and the sending country is recalled for trial. Forms of state accountability that can be carried out by North Korea (sending country) to Bangladesh (receiving country) include compensation and satisfaction. Compensation is a form of state responsibility in the form of money payments given due to material losses due to the actions of diplomatic officials who abuse their powers. While satisfaction is a form of state responsibility by apologizing for the actions of its diplomatic officials.},
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {1168--1185}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v1i12.874},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/874}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


A K, Syahmin. Hukum Diplomatik Dalam Kerangka Studi Dan Analisis. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2008.

Anggraini, Cathy, Peni Susetyorini, and Kholis Roisah. “Penyalahgunaan Hak Kekebalan Diplomatik Ditinjau Dari Konvensi Wina 1961 (Studi Kasus Penyelundupan Emas Oleh Pejabat Diplom Atik Korea Utara Di Bangladesh).” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 3 (2016): 1–17.

Briggs, H.W. The Law Of Nation. New York: Century Crofts, 1968.

Chowdhury, Syed Tashfin. “North Korea Apologizes After Diplomat Caught Smuggling $1.4M of Gold into Bangladesh.” vice.com, 2015. https://www.vice.com/en/article/3ke39n/north-korea-apologizes-after-diplomat-caught-smuggling-14m-of-gold-into-bangladesh.

Dammen, Nicholas Tandi. “Kewenangan Perwakilan RI Di Luar Negeri.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 2, no. 4 (2005): 710–26.

Hadadi, Muhammad Fahmi. “Analisis Tindakan Pemerintah Bangladesh Yang Memeriksa Tas Diplomatik Son Young Nam Sekretaris I Korea Utara Untuk Bangladesh Di Bandara Dhaka Ditinjau Dari Konvensi Wina 1961.” Universitas Surabaya, 2019.

https://news.vice.com/article/north-koreaapologizes-after-diplomat-caught-smuggling-14mof-gold-into-bangladesh

https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/19432/penyalahgunaan-hak-kekebalan-diplomatik-ditinjau-dari-konvensi-wina-1961-studi-kasus-penyulundupan-emas -oleh-pejabat-diplomatik-korea-utara-di-bangladesh

https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spionase

https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spionase

Kansil, C.S.T. Hubungan Diplomatik Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1988.

Khan, Moinul. “Bangladesh Expels North Korean Diplomat for Smuggling.” aljazeera.com, 2016. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/8/8/bangladesh-expels-north-korean-diplomat-for-smuggling.

Mangku, Dewa Gede Sudika, Nyoman Tia Resita Dewi, and I Wayan Lasmawan. “Akibat Hukum Atas Penyalahgunaan Hak Kekebalan Diplomatik Ditinjau Dari Konvensi Wina 1961 (Studi Kasus Penyeludupan Emas Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pejabat Diplomatik Korea Utara Di Bangladesh).” Justitia Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 2 (2020): 221–36.

Matanews.com/2020/03/31/liga-arab-tolak-surat-icc

Nasution, M Sanwani. “Pengantar Hukum Internasional Dalam Hubungan Diplomatik.” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera, 1980.

Pandean, Claudya Gladys. “Hak Dan Kewajiban Hukum Negara Penerima Terhadap Diplomat Menurut Konvensi Wina Tahun 1961.” Lex Privatum 4, no. 4 (2016): 111–18.

Poeteri, Olivia Razmana, Djoko Susilo, and Suyani Indriastuti. “Pemutusan Hubungan Diplomatik Kanada Terhadap Iran.” Repository.Unej.Ac.Id. Jember, 2013. https://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/59093.

Starke, J G. Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.

Suryokusumo, Sumaryo. Hukum Diplomatik Dan Konsuler. Jakarta: Tatanusa, 2013.

———. Hukum Diplomatik Teori Dan Kasus. Bandung: Alumni, 1995.

———. Pratik Diplomasi. Bandung: BP. IBLAM, 2004.

Suryono, Edy, and Moenir Arisoendha. Hukum Diplomatik : Kekebalan Dan Keistimewaannya. Bandung: Angkasa, 1991.

Syahmin, Syahmin. Hukum Diplomatik Suatu Pengantar. Palembang: Armico, 1985.

Widgago, Setyo, and Hanifa Nur W. Hukum Diplomatik Dan Konsuler. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2008.

Yusuf, Suffry. Hubungan Internasional Dan Politik Luar Negeri. Jakarta: Pustaka Harapan, 1989.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 2087 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 10011 times

 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Tanggung Jawab Perwakilan Diplomatik Yang Melakukan Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Negara Penerima (Receiving State)
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Tasya Rahim; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Efie Baadila; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Responsibility; Dplomatic Representative; Abuse of Authority.
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: Diplomatic representatives who abuse this authority because of their inherent rights of immunity and immunity.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to identify and understand the responsibilities of diplomatic officials who commit acts of abuse of authority in the receiving country according to the 1961 Vienna Convention and to identify and understand the state's responsibility to diplomatic officials who commit acts of abuse of authority in the receiving country. Methods of the Research: This study uses normative legal research methods, using primary, secondary, tertiary legal sources and the collection of legal materials is carried out using library research. Furthermore, the analysis technique uses qualitative analysis and is presented descriptively, namely analyzing the legal material obtained based on the legal rules and to identify and conclude the results of the analysis in accordance with the problems raised.Results of the Research: The form of responsibility of a diplomatic representative or diplomatic official who abuses his authority in the country receiving the diplomatic official can receive consequences in Persona Non Grata, the immunities and privileges of diplomatic officials are removed and the sending country is recalled for trial. Forms of state accountability that can be carried out by North Korea (sending country) to Bangladesh (receiving country) include compensation and satisfaction. Compensation is a form of state responsibility in the form of money payments given due to material losses due to the actions of diplomatic officials who abuse their powers. While satisfaction is a form of state responsibility by apologizing for the actions of its diplomatic officials.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law Pattimura University
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2022-02-28
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/874
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/tatohi.v1i12.874
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 1, No 12 (2022): Volume 1 Nomor 12, Februari 2022
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

Licence : TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Tasya Rahim, Efie Baadila, Johanis Steny Franco Peilouw

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.