Legal Implications of Unilateral Collateral Takeover by Village Credit Institutions on Debtors' Legal Protection

Dewa Ayu M Parisnawati; Egriel Cinta Novitri; Mahatma Mustika Purwa Wijaya

doi:10.47268/ballrev.v7i2.3891

Authors

Dewa Ayu M Parisnawati ✉ Universitas Gadjah Mada , Indonesia
Egriel Cinta Novitri Universitas Gadjah Mada , Indonesia
Mahatma Mustika Purwa Wijaya Universitas Gadjah Mada , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v7i2.3891

Keywords:

Taken Over Collateral, Village Credit Institution, Principle of Good Faith, Debtor Protection

Abstract

Introduction: Village Credit Institutions are community-based financial institutions with unique legal status in Bali, operating outside the jurisdiction of microfinance institutions. Village Credit Institutions when disbursing loans, often face bad loans, which are usually handled through the Blocking Mechanism (Taken Over Collateral). However, Taken Over Collateral is often carried out by the Village Credit Institution itself without the debtor's voluntary consent, which raises serious questions about the validity of the procedure and legal protection for the debtor.

Purposes of the Research: This study discusses legal protection for debtors when Taken Over Collateral is applied unilaterally, judging from the principle of good faith, and also examines the legal consequences of such practices on the debtor's legal position.

Methods of the Research: This research uses a normative approach with a legislative review, concepts, and historical approaches through the examination of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials.

Results Main Findings of the Research: The results show that the Collateral Taken Over unilaterally is a violation of the principle of good faith because it was carried out without a valid voluntary surrender deed. The legal consequence is that the takeover has the potential to be null and void from the outset and can be canceled, as well as open up the possibility of lawsuits for unlawful acts. The debtor remains the legal owner of the guarantee until the execution is carried out procedurally and legally valid.

References

Arif Wibowo, “Pertimbangan Hakim atas Adanya Surat Kuasa Jual Menjual Agunan Kredit dalam Perkara Kredit Macet Perkara No. 38/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Skt di Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta”, Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 2020.

Eliakim Tinambunan, et al., “Perlindungan Hukum Debitur atas Agunan yang Diambil Alih BPR Berdasarkan Asas Kepastian Hukum dan Itikad Baik” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 1 (2026): 119. https://doi.org/10.30652/srr3cv72.

Dewa Putu Adnyana, and I Ketut Sudantra, “Kepastian Hukum mengenai Penjamin Simpanan bagi Nasabah pada Lembaga Perkreditan Desa di Bali,” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 9, no. 4, (2020): 875, https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i04.p14.

Fatahillah, and Hasmah Fadhilah, “Perlindungan Hukum Lembaga Perkreditan Desa di Bali Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 Tentang Lembaga Keuangan Mikro,” Jurnal Hukum, Sosial dan Humaniora 1, no. 3 (2023): 216-217, https://doi.org/10.70193/cendekia.v1i3.28.

Henry Campbell Black, M. A., Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, West Publishing CO., 1951.

I Artawan. "Strategi Penanggulangan Kredit Macet di Lembaga Perkreditan Desa (Lembaga Perkreditan Desa) Desa Adat Padang Luwih", PhD diss., Politeknik Negeri Bali, (2025): https://repository.pnb.ac.id/id/eprint/18027.

I Made Suwitra, I Ketut Selamet, dan Luh Kade Datrini, “Penguatan Kapasitas Lembaga Perkreditan Desa Desa Adat di Bali Melalui Penyuratan Awig-Awig,” Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan 50, no. 3 (2020): 685–687. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no3.2585.

I Wayan Sastrawan, et al., “Peranan Lembaga Pemberdayaan Lembaga Perkreditan Desa (Lembaga Perkreditan Desa) Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Macet” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 1, no. 2 (2020): 171, https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.1.2.2355.169-174.

Leilani Alysia Hapsari dan Anang Setiyawan, “Penerapan Asas Itikad Baik dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata”, Zaaken: Journal of civil and business law 4, no. 3 (2023): 443-444, https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v4i3.31365.

Lusi Intan Puspita, et al., “Peran Notaris Dalam Mekanisme Agunan Yang Diambil Alih (Agunan yang Diambil Alih) Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Kredit Macet” Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan 14, no. 1 (2025): 57, https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v14i1.4757.

Made Dilla Nitya Nirmala & Ni Putu Purwanti, “Status Lembaga Perkreditan Desa Sebagai Institusi Keuangan Desa Adat”, Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 5 (2018): 3, https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/54065.

Made Eka Agustini, “Peran Lembaga Perkreditan Desa (Lembaga Perkreditan Desa) Dalam Memberikan Pelayanan Pada Masyarakat Desa Legian”, Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial 3, no. 2 (2019): 281, https://doi.org/10.38043/jids.v3i2.2212.

Mia Hadiati, et al., “Peran Desa Adat dalam Tata Kelola Lembaga Perkreditan (Lembaga Perkreditan Desa) di Bali,” Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial 5, no. 2, (2021): 584-586, https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v5i2.10080.2021.

Munir Fuady, Hukum Jaminan Kredit, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2017.

Muhamad Kevin. "Peran Notaris Terhadap Pengambilalihan Aset Nasabah (Agunan yang Diambil Alih) Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta Nomor 258/PDT/2020/PT. DKI." Indonesian Notary 3, no. 4 (2021): 315, https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol3/iss4/15.

Ni Made Devi Jayanthi, I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana & I Wayan Wiryawan, “Status Dan Kedudukan Lembaga Perkreditan Desa (Lembaga Perkreditan Desa) Terkait Pengikatan Jaminan Dengan Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 Tentang Lembaga Keuangan Mikro”, Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 2, no. 2, (2017): 202, https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2017.v02.i02.p04.

Ni Made Rat Suratmini , and Ni Kadek Ayu Trisnadewi, “Prosedur Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Pada Lembaga Perkreditan Desa di Desa Bulian, Kecamatan Kubutambahan, Kabupaten Buleleng”, INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research 4, no. 4 (2024): 6, https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i4.17425.

Ni Putu Kompiang Ratna Dewi and A.A. Istri Eka Krisna Yanti, “Kewenangan Lembaga Perkreditan Desa dalam Pengambilalihan Agunan yang Diambil Alih melalui Hak Tanggungan,” Jurnal Kertha Semaya 12, (2024): 2352-2355. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=FWkSWZYAAAAJ&hl=id.

Problematika Agunan Yang Diambil Alih (Agunan Yang Diambil Alih) Bank dan Kontradiksi dalam Pengaturannya, Mahkamah Agung, https://share.google/YlXrNJtGoUaw7LeFs.

Riska Fibrianti, “Kedudukan Hukum Objek Jaminan Sertipikat Hak Milik Yang Diambil Alih Kreditor (Agunan Yang Diambil Alih) Sebagai Badan Hukum Dengan Akta De Command” AKTUALITA 3, no. 1 (2020): 43. https://doi.org/10.29313/shjih.v18i1.6365.

Siregar, Nur Rizki, and Mohamad Fajri Mekka Putra. "Tinjauan Hukum Kekuatan Eksekutorial Terhadap Permohonan Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Atas Debitur Wanprestasi." Jurnal USM Law Review 5, no. 1 (2022): 130, https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4872.

Wulandari, and Fitria Ajeng. "Juridical Consequences of Bad Credit Settlement with Foreclosure Collateral Process (Foreclosed Collateral) by Banks Based on the Law on Dependent's Rights." Officium Notary 4, no. 2 (2024): p. 310, https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol4.iss2.art7.