Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Peminjaman Nama Perusahaan Untuk Mengikuti Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v4i2.2161Keywords:
Legal Accountability, Borrowing a Company's Name, Government Procurement of Goods and Services.Abstract
Introduction: The practice of using another company's name to participate in government procurement contracts is a common occurrence today. Although there are no explicit regulations prohibiting this practice, borrowing another company's name can be done due to affiliations between related companies or as an attempt to deceive the bidding organizers.
Purposes of the Research: This research aims to examine and analyze the legitimacy of the practice of borrowing a company's name to participate in government procurement of goods and services, as well as the forms of accountability for breaches of contract in the implementation of such name borrowing in procurement processes.
Methods of the Research: This research is a normative juridical research, using a descriptive analytical research type using primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. The approach used is a statutory approach (Statute Approach), a conceptual approach (conceptual approach) and a case approach (Case Approach). The technique of collecting legal materials uses a literature study which is then analyzed qualitatively in order to answer the problems studied.
Results of the Research: The research findings indicate that the practice of using another company's name in government procurement of goods and services violates various legal provisions, including Presidential Regulation No. 16 of 2018, Regulation of the Procurement Policy Agency (LKPP) No. 9 of 2019, as well as the Law on the Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition. This practice also fails to meet the requirements of a valid agreement as it contradicts the law. The winning company of the tender is fully responsible for the contract's implementation, including if it utilizes another company's name, and can be sued by the aggrieved party in case of breach of contract, with legal consequences including compensation, contract termination, administrative sanctions, blacklisting, and criminal penalties.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Artikel Jurnal
Didik J. Rachbini, Anti Monopoly and Fair Competition Law No. 5/1999: Cartel and Merger Control in Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis vol. 19, 2002.
Yakub Adi Krisanto, Analisis Pasal 22 Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 dan Karakteristik Putusan KPPU tentang Persekongkolan Tender, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Vol. 24, No. 2, Yayasan Pengembangan Hukum Bisnis, 2005.
Buku
Adi Windy Rizky, Pengaruh Motivasi dan Kepuasan terhadap Disiplin Kerja Karyawan Kusuma Agrowisata Hotel Batu, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, 2011.
Ahmadi Miru, Hukum Kontrak dan Perancangan Kontrak, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2007.
Alexander Thian, Hukum Dagang, Andi Offset, Yogyakarta, 2021.
Andi Fahmi Lubis, et.al, Hukum Persaingan Usaha antara Teks dan Konteks, Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha, Jakarta, 2009.
Arie Siswanto, Hukum Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2002.
Didik J Rachbini, Ekonomi Politik: Kebijakan dan Strategi Pembangunan, Granit, Jakarta, 2004.
Hery, Hukum Bisnis, Grasindo, Jakarta, 2020.
Mardani, Hukum Perikatan Syariah di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2013.
Masitah Pohan., Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan, Pustaka Bangsa Press, Medan.
Nadapdap, Binoto. Hukum Acara Persaingan Usaha, Jala Permata Aksara, Jakarta, 2009.
Poerwadarminta, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta, 2002.
Purwosusilo, Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa, Kencana, Jakarta, 2014.
Rachmadi Usman, Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia, Cetakan Pertama, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2013.
Rusli, Hardijan, Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia dan Common Law, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, 1993.
Setiadi, Budidaya Kentang (Pilihan Berbagai Varietas dan Pengadaan. Benih). Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta, 2009
Sogar Simamora, Y. Hukum Kontrak, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Kontrak Pengadaan barang dan Jasa Pemerintah di Indonesia, LaksBang PRESSindo, Surabaya, 2017.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Asas-asas Hukum Perjanjian, Sumur, Bandung, 1999.
Skripsi, Tesis, Distertasi, Online/World Wide Web dan Lain-Lain
Eko Mulyono, Analisis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Kasus Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Purbalingga Tentang Wanprestasi Akad Murabahah (Putusan No.1720/Pdt.G/2013/PA.Pbg). Skripsi. Fakultas Syariah: IAIN Salatiga, 2017.
https://mmc.kalteng.go.id/berita/read/36791/pemahaman-dasar-pengadaan-barang-jasa.
https://www.hukum-hukum.com/2017/06/resiko-praktik-pinjam-namabadan-usaha.html.
https://butew.com/2018/05/09/pengertian-prestasiwanprestasi-danakibatnya-menurut-hukum-perdata.
Muhammad Urfi Amrillah, Tinjauan Hukum Islam Terhadap Peminjaman Nama Badan Usaha Dalam Lelang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, 2015.
Zuardi, Edu Vitra. Penerapan Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Jasa Konstruksi, Skripsi, Universitas Indonesia, Fakultas hukum, Jakarta, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sunoto Sunoto, Mery Tjoanda, Teng Berlianty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
