Pemberhentian Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Melalui Mekanisme Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa

Siti Hajar; Budiman Ginting; Bismar Nasution; Sunarmi Sunarmi

doi:10.47268/pamali.v4i2.2200

Pemberhentian Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Melalui Mekanisme Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa

Siti Hajar⁽¹⁾, Budiman Ginting⁽²⁾, Bismar Nasution⁽³⁾, Sunarmi Sunarmi⁽⁴⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
(4) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: The management of the company is the sole responsibility of the board of directors. The law does not provide. The law does not provide for the board of commissioners to give direct and permanent members of the board of directors, but is limited to temporary dismissal. This is the background for the dismissal of the directors of the Company without going through the mechanism of an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders.

Purposes of the Research: Is to know the judge's consideration of the appointment and dismissal of judges in decision number 15/pdt.g/2013/PN.Cibinong and to know the legal consequences in the dismissal of directors not in accordance with the mechanism of the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders, to achieve the objectives of this research normative juridical research is used through a statutory approach.

Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical with legal, conceptual, and case approaches.

Results of the Research: The results of the research obtained that the implementation of the dismissal of the Board of Directors based on the decision Number 15/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Cibinong that the dismissal mechanism is not in accordance with the provisions of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies carried out by the Board of Commissioners of PT. SBTI, thus causing legal consequences affected to the company, namely the Minister rejects any application submitted or notification submitted to the Minister, and because the dismissal is not in accordance with the provisions, the dismissal is invalid and null and void and restore the position of the old Board of Directors who have been temporarily dismissed.The dismissal of a member of the Board of Directors is to stop the person concerned from the position of the Board of Directors before the term of office specified in the articles of association or the decision of the GMS expires. In article 106 of the 2007 Company Law, the temporary dismissal of the Board of Directors is the right and authority of the Board of Directors, but not to dismiss directly and permanently.

Keywords

Dismissal of Directors; Change of Directors; GMS.

DOI

10.47268/pamali.v4i2.2200

Published

2024-07-30

How To Cite

APA: Hajar, S., Ginting, B., Nasution, B., & Sunarmi, S. (2024). Pemberhentian Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Melalui Mekanisme Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa. PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 4(2), 141 - 150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v4i2.2200.

IEEE: S. Hajar, B. Ginting, B. Nasution, and S. Sunarmi, "Pemberhentian Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Melalui Mekanisme Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa", Pamali Pattimura Magister Law Rev., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 141 - 150, Jul. 2024. Accessed on: Apr. 26, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v4i2.2200

Harvard: Hajar, S., Ginting, B., Nasution, B., and Sunarmi, S., (2024). "Pemberhentian Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Melalui Mekanisme Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa". PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, Volume 4(2), pp. 141 - 150. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v4i2.2200 (Accessed on: 26 April 2025)

Chicago: Hajar, Siti, Budiman Ginting, Bismar Nasution, and Sunarmi Sunarmi. "Pemberhentian Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Melalui Mekanisme Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa." PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review 4, no. 2 (July 30, 2024): 141 - 150. Accessed April 26, 2025. doi:10.47268/pamali.v4i2.2200

Vancouver: Hajar S, Ginting B, Nasution B, Sunarmi S. Pemberhentian Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Melalui Mekanisme Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa. Pamali Pattimura Magister Law Rev. [Internet]. 2024 Jul 30 [cited 2025 Apr 26];4(2):141 - 150. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v4i2.2200

MLA 8th: Hajar, Siti, Budiman Ginting, Bismar Nasution, and Sunarmi Sunarmi. "Pemberhentian Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Melalui Mekanisme Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa." PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, vol. 4, no. 2, 30 Jul. 2024, pp. 141 - 150, doi:10.47268/pamali.v4i2.2200. Accessed 26 Apr. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{pamali2200,
		author = {Siti Hajar and Budiman Ginting and Bismar Nasution and Sunarmi Sunarmi},
		title = {Pemberhentian Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Melalui Mekanisme Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa},
		journal = {PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review},
		volume = {4},
		number = {2},
		year = {2024},
		keywords = {Dismissal of Directors; Change of Directors; GMS.},
		abstract = {Introduction: The management of the company is the sole responsibility of the board of directors. The law does not provide. The law does not provide for the board of commissioners to give direct and permanent members of the board of directors, but is limited to temporary dismissal. This is the background for the dismissal of the directors of the Company without going through the mechanism of an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders.Purposes of the Research:  Is to know the judge's consideration of the appointment and dismissal of judges in decision number 15/pdt.g/2013/PN.Cibinong and to know the legal consequences in the dismissal of directors not in accordance with the mechanism of the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders, to achieve the objectives of this research normative juridical research is used through a statutory approach.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical with legal, conceptual, and case approaches.Results of the Research: The results of the research obtained that the implementation of the dismissal of the Board of Directors based on the decision Number 15/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Cibinong that the dismissal mechanism is not in accordance with the provisions of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies carried out by the Board of Commissioners of PT. SBTI, thus causing legal consequences affected to the company, namely the Minister rejects any application submitted or notification submitted to the Minister, and because the dismissal is not in accordance with the provisions, the dismissal is invalid and null and void and restore the position of the old Board of Directors who have been temporarily dismissed.The dismissal of a member of the Board of Directors is to stop the person concerned from the position of the Board of Directors before the term of office specified in the articles of association or the decision of the GMS expires. In article 106 of the 2007 Company Law, the temporary dismissal of the Board of Directors is the right and authority of the Board of Directors, but not to dismiss directly and permanently.},
				issn = {2775-5649},		pages = {141--150}			doi = {10.47268/pamali.v4i2.2200},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/pamali/article/view/2200}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Buku

Achmad Ali, Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis Dan Sosiologis) (Jakarta: Toko Gunung Agung, 2002).

Binoto Nadapdap, Ukum Perseroan Terbatas, Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 (Jakarta: Permata Aksara, 2012).

Budiarto Agus, Kedudukan Hukum Dan Tanggung Jawab Pendiri Perseroan Terbatas (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2002).

Dhaniswara K. Harjono, Pembaruan Hukum Perseroan Terbatas: Tinjauan Terbatas Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas (Jakarta: PPHBI, 2008).

Dominikus Rato, Filsafat Hukum Mencari: Memahami Dan Memahami Hukum (Yogyakartas: Laksbang Pressind, 2009).

Freddy Harris dan Teddy Anggoro, Hukum Perseroan Terbatas: Kewajiban Pemberitahuan Oleh Direksi (Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2010).

Gatot Supramono, Hukum Perseroan Terbatas Yang Baru (Jakarta: Djambatan, 1999).

H. Man S. Sastrawidjaja, Perseroan Terbatas Menurut Tiga Undang-Undang, 1st ed. (Bandung: Alumni, 2008).

Hendra Setiawan Boen, Bianglala Bussines Judgement Rules (Jakarta: Tatanusa, 2008).

Michael Bixby et al, The Legal Environment of Business. (New Jerrey: Prentice-Hall Inc, 2001).

Munir Fuady, Perseroan Terbatas Paradigma Baru (Bandung: Citra Adytia Bakti, 2003).

Van Apeldoorn, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1990).

Lain-Lain

M. Azmi Daru Nugraha, “Mplementasi Prinsip Business Judgement Rule Dalam Pengurusan Perseroan Terbatas,” n.d.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 272 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 1926 times


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Pemberhentian Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Melalui Mekanisme Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Siti Hajar; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Budiman Ginting; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Bismar Nasution; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Sunarmi Sunarmi; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Dismissal of Directors; Change of Directors; GMS.

4.	Description	Abstract	Introduction: The management of the company is the sole responsibility of the board of directors. The law does not provide. The law does not provide for the board of commissioners to give direct and permanent members of the board of directors, but is limited to temporary dismissal. This is the background for the dismissal of the directors of the Company without going through the mechanism of an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders.Purposes of the Research: Is to know the judge's consideration of the appointment and dismissal of judges in decision number 15/pdt.g/2013/PN.Cibinong and to know the legal consequences in the dismissal of directors not in accordance with the mechanism of the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders, to achieve the objectives of this research normative juridical research is used through a statutory approach.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical with legal, conceptual, and case approaches.Results of the Research: The results of the research obtained that the implementation of the dismissal of the Board of Directors based on the decision Number 15/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Cibinong that the dismissal mechanism is not in accordance with the provisions of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies carried out by the Board of Commissioners of PT. SBTI, thus causing legal consequences affected to the company, namely the Minister rejects any application submitted or notification submitted to the Minister, and because the dismissal is not in accordance with the provisions, the dismissal is invalid and null and void and restore the position of the old Board of Directors who have been temporarily dismissed.The dismissal of a member of the Board of Directors is to stop the person concerned from the position of the Board of Directors before the term of office specified in the articles of association or the decision of the GMS expires. In article 106 of the 2007 Company Law, the temporary dismissal of the Board of Directors is the right and authority of the Board of Directors, but not to dismiss directly and permanently.

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Postgraduate Program in Law, Pattimura University

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2024-07-30

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/pamali/article/view/2200

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/pamali.v4i2.2200

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review; Vol 4, No 2 (2024): JULI

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) Licence : PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..