Quo Vadis Penegakan Hukum Bermartabat: Kritik Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Berlandaskan Stigma No Viral No Justice
)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: The emergence of the law enforcement phenomenon based on the stigma of no viral no justice gives a bad image to the face of Indonesian law enforcement, because it leads to a form of law enforcement that is no longer dignified. As a result, the victims must use it in the form of viralizing the case they are experiencing so that they can rally the external power of the public.
Purposes of the Research: This paper aims to analyze and examine a number of points that are the basis for law enforcement criticism based on the stigma of no viral no justice.
Methods of the Research: This paper uses normative legal research methods. The approaches used are conceptual approaches, theoretical approaches and analytical approaches.
Results / Main Findings: Law enforcement based on the stigma of no viral no justice in recent years has tarnished the face of Indonesian law enforcement. In fact, this condition has "legitimized" law enforcement to no longer be dignified because it is not in accordance with the principles of law enforcement as it should be. This paper offers three basic criticisms of the form of law enforcement with these conditions, including: first, the occurrence of deviations from the principle of equality before the law. The law no longer views the position of each legal subject as equal and equal without discrimination, but rather views whether the case is viral or not; second, the shift and change of the basic meaning of legality from no crime without criminal acts, to no crime without the virality of criminal acts/no crimes without going viral first; Third, the enforcement of the stigma of no viral no justice drags the goal of the law in obscurity to arrive at its noble mission in realizing justice, legality and legal certainty.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/pamali.v4i2.2247
Published
2024-07-31
How To Cite
@article{pamali2247,
author = {Muammar Muammar},
title = {Quo Vadis Penegakan Hukum Bermartabat: Kritik Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Berlandaskan Stigma No Viral No Justice},
journal = {PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review},
volume = {4},
number = {2},
year = {2024},
keywords = {Law Enforcement; No Viral No Justice; Legality Principles; Legal Purpose.},
abstract = {Introduction: The emergence of the law enforcement phenomenon based on the stigma of no viral no justice gives a bad image to the face of Indonesian law enforcement, because it leads to a form of law enforcement that is no longer dignified. As a result, the victims must use it in the form of viralizing the case they are experiencing so that they can rally the external power of the public.Purposes of the Research: This paper aims to analyze and examine a number of points that are the basis for law enforcement criticism based on the stigma of no viral no justice.Methods of the Research: This paper uses normative legal research methods. The approaches used are conceptual approaches, theoretical approaches and analytical approaches.Results / Main Findings: Law enforcement based on the stigma of no viral no justice in recent years has tarnished the face of Indonesian law enforcement. In fact, this condition has "legitimized" law enforcement to no longer be dignified because it is not in accordance with the principles of law enforcement as it should be. This paper offers three basic criticisms of the form of law enforcement with these conditions, including: first, the occurrence of deviations from the principle of equality before the law. The law no longer views the position of each legal subject as equal and equal without discrimination, but rather views whether the case is viral or not; second, the shift and change of the basic meaning of legality from no crime without criminal acts, to no crime without the virality of criminal acts/no crimes without going viral first; Third, the enforcement of the stigma of no viral no justice drags the goal of the law in obscurity to arrive at its noble mission in realizing justice, legality and legal certainty.},
issn = {2775-5649}, pages = {167--179} doi = {10.47268/pamali.v4i2.2247},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/pamali/article/view/2247}
}
Artikel Jurnal
Azahwa, Syafara, Shafina Ayuningdhyani Aqila, Suci Pertiwi, Salsabila Saputri, dan Zulfara Giska. “Pengaruh Fenomena No Viral No Justice Dalam Putusan Kasus Penganiayaan David Ozora.” Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Interdisiplinier 8, no. 5 (2024): 87–92.
Grecya, Elsa, dan Ilham Effendi Yahya. “Building Civic Engagement Through the ‘No Viral No Justice’ Phenomenon.” Journal Civics And Social Studies 6, no. 1 (2022): 51–59. https://doi.org/10.31980/journalcss.v6i1.199.
Gugule, Hamdi, dan Romi Mesra. “Analisis Sosiologis Terhadap Video Viral Tiktok tentang Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia.” Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya 8, no. 3 (24 Agustus 2022): 1071. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v8i3.956.
Muammar. “Penanganan Tindak Pidana Viral: Reduksi Terhadap Asas Legalitas Ke Asas Viralitas.” PATTIMURA Legal Journal 2, no. 1 (2023): 19–29. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v2i1.8362.
Runturambi, Arthur Josias Simon, Munarni Aswindo, dan Eliza Meiyani. “No Viral No Justice: A Criminological Review of Social Media-Based Law Enforcement from the Perspective of Progressive Law.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 12, no. 1 (2024): 177–95.
Sahbana, M. Dwi Rahman. “Epistimologi Paradigma Dan Revolusi Ilmu Pengetahuan Thomas Kuhn.” Kanz Philosophia A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism 8, no. 1 (2022): 31–48. https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm.v8i1.188.
Shidarta. “Asas ‘Legalitas.’” ResearchGate, 2016. http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/RG.2.2.15209.62560.
———. “Pembiaran, Impunitas, dan Anomali Hukum.” ResearchGate, 22 April 2018. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20765.03049.
Sudirman, Lu dan Antony. “Peran Media Sosial Sebagai Alat Pencapaian Suara Keadilan Dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia : No Viral No Justice.” Paulus Law Journal 5, no. 1 (25 Oktober 2023): 16–40. https://doi.org/10.51342/plj.v5i1.626.
TB M Ali Ridho Azhari dan Soleh Rosyad. “The Viral Phenomenon on Social Media is a New Legal Norm-No Viral, No Justice.” International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies 3, no. 4 (2023): 277–82.
Tirtakusuma, Eleazar Josiah, dan Andreas Eno Tirtakusuma. “Viral Sebagai Sarana Pembelaan Diri (Kajian Kemungkinan Penuntutan Pidana Dalam ‘No Viral No Justice’).” Jurnal Hukum Dan Bisnis (Selisik) 10, no. 1 (30 Juni 2024): 3–24.
Buku
Ilyas, Amir. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Memahami Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Sebagai Syarat Pemidanaan. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education, 2012.
Rusli, Tami. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Lampung: Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL) Press, 2017.
Sofyan, Andi. Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education, 2013.
Sofyan, Andi, dan Nur Azisa. Buku Ajar Hukum Pidana. Makassar: Pustaka Pena Press, 2016.
Suparmin, Sudirman. Hak-Hak Korban Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Medan: CV. Manhaji, 2020.
Yati Nurhayati. Buku Ajar Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2020.
Online/World Wide Web
April. “Kontroversi Kasus Vina Cirebon ‘No Justice No Viral’ Singgung Soal Integritas - Ntvnews.id.” https://www.ntvnews.id/, 3 Juni 2024. https://www.ntvnews.id/news/013386/kontroversi-kasus-vina-cirebon-no-justice-no-viral-singgung-soal-integritas.
Costa, Fabio Mario Lopes. “Ribuan Tanda Tanya di Balik Kejanggalan Kasus Vina.” kompas.id, 27 Mei 2024. https://www.kompas.id/baca/nusantara/2024/05/27/ribuan-tanda-tanya-di-balik-dugaan-kejanggalan-kasus-vina.
H, Clara Maria Tjandra Dewi. “Kronologi Kematian Afif Maulana Versi Polisi, Sempat Ajak Teman Lompat Dari Jembatan.” Tempo, 3 Juli 2024. https://metro.tempo.co/read/1886974/kronologi-kematian-afif-maulana-versi-polisi-sempat-ajak-teman-lompat-dari-jembatan.
https://emedia.dpr.go.id/. “Fenomena ‘No Viral, No Justice’ Kasus Perundungan Jadi Tamparan Keras bagi Penegakan Hukum,” 28 Maret 2024. https://emedia.dpr.go.id/2024/03/28/fenomena-no-viral-no-justice-kasus-perundungan-jadi-tamparan-keras-bagi-penegakan-hukum/.
Sastra, Yola. “Kronologi Kasus Afif Maulana, Bocah di Padang yang Diduga Disiksa Polisi.” kompas.id, 25 Juni 2024. https://www.kompas.id/baca/nusantara/2024/06/25/kronologi-kasus-afif-maulana-bocah-di-padang-yang-diduga-disiksa-polisi.
Setuningsih, Novianti, dan Rahel Narda Chaterine. “‘Timeline’ Kasus Pembunuhan Brigadir J hingga Berujung Hukuman Mati untuk Ferdy Sambo.” KOMPAS.com, 12 Juli 2023. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/07/12/13232191/timeline-kasus-pembunuhan-brigadir-j-hingga-berujung-hukuman-mati-untuk.
Tysara, Laudia. “Afif Maulana Siapa dan Mengapa Kasusnya Harus Dikawal? Pahami Kronologinya.” liputan6.com, 2 Juli 2024. https://www.liputan6.com/hot/read/5633163/afif-maulana-siapa-dan-mengapa-kasusnya-harus-dikawal-pahami-kronologinya.
Wijaya, Agung Hermansyah, Arif Sastra. “Lobang Hitam ‘No Viral No Justice.’” https://news.detik.com/, 3 Juli 2023. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-6803418/lobang-hitam-no-viral-no-justice.
: 65 times
Download : 37 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Muammar Muammar
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
