Penegakkan Yurisdiksi International Criminal Court atas Kejahatan Agresi Pasca Kampala Amendments Diadopsi dalam Rome Statute
)
(1) Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v26i4.272
Published
2020-12-30
How To Cite
@article{SASI272,
author = {Apripari Irham},
title = {Penegakkan Yurisdiksi International Criminal Court atas Kejahatan Agresi Pasca Kampala Amendments Diadopsi dalam Rome Statute},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {26},
number = {4},
year = {2020},
keywords = {Jurisdiction of Internasional Criminal Court; Crimes of Aggeession; Kampala Amendments.},
abstract = {Until the entry into force of the Rome Statute, the definition of the crime of aggression was not also found in it. This leaves the International Criminal Court (ICC) without jurisdiction over crimes of aggression. The absence of ICC jurisdiction over crimes of aggression has resulted in military aggression that has not been processed by the ICC during the time when the proxy war / cold war was initiated. This means that the violation of delicto jus gentium juice is allowed even after the ICC has been established. This study aims: (1) to identify and identify the definition, limitations, and jurisdiction of the ICC for crimes of aggression; and (2) to determine the enforcement of ICC jurisdiction over crimes of aggression after the Kampala Amendments were adopted into the Rome Statute. The research method uses a type of normative research with a statutory approach and a historical approach. The results show that the ICC's definition, limitations, and jurisdiction over the crime of aggression have existed in the Rome Statute since Kampala Amendments were adopted into the Rome Statute. However, until now the enforcement of the ICC's jurisdiction over crimes of aggression has not been carried out concretely.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {540--556} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v26i4.272},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/272}
}
Jurnal
[1] Bone, S. (2011). "Urgensi Statuta Roma 1998 Terhadap Kejahatan HAM Dalam Konflik Israel dan Palestina". Jurnal Amanna Gappa, 19 (3): 324-343.
[2] Ferencz, B. B. (2007). "Enabling the International Criminal Court to Punish Aggression". Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 6 (5).
[3] Gunakaya, W. (2013). "Peranan dan Prospek "Internasional Criminal Court" Sebagai International Criminal Policy Dalam Menanggulangi "International Crimes". Jurnal Wawasan Hukum, 29 (2).
[4] Hartono, Bambang dan Hapsari, Recca Ayu. (2019). "Mutual Legal Assistance Pada pemberantasan Cyber Crime Lintas Yurisdiksi di Indonesia". SASI, 25 (1): 59-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i1.136
[5] Nurhidayatuloh. (2011). "Kejahatan Agresi Dalam Tatanan Hukum Internasional Modern Sebagai Peremptory Norm". QISTI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 5 (2).
[6] Noor, T. (2014). "Agresi dan Kejahatan Terhadap Perdamaian". Supremasi Hukum, 3 (1).
[7] Nisa, Candra Ulfatun dan Disemadi, Hari Sutra. (2020). "Yurisdiksi Kriminal Terhadap Black Flight Di Ruang Udara Wilayah Indonesia", SASI, 26 (3): 365-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i3.289
[8] Suryokusumo, S. (2005). "Agresi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional". Jurnal Hukum Internasional, 3 (1).
[9] Tomlinson, B. R. (2003). "What was the Third World". Journal of Contemporary History, 38 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009403038002135
[10] Wulandari, D. A. (2015). "Agresi Amerika Serikat Terhadap Irak Periode 2003-2010", Journal of Internasional Relations, 1 (2): 132-140.
[11] Yustitianingtyas, L. (2014). "Pertanggungjawaban Negara Dalam Perspektif Hukum Humaniter Dalam Tindakan Agresi (Studi Kasus: Agresi Israel ke Lebanon Tahun 2006)", Perspektif Hukum, 14 (1): 33-52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30649/phj.v14i1.30.
[12] Zuhra, N. M. (2020). "Kategorisasi Kejahatan Agresi atas Tindakan Penggunaan Kekerasan Negara Perancis Pada Konflik Republik Mali Dalam Hukum Pidana Internasional". Jurnal Selat, 7 (2): 223-238, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31629/selat.v7i2.1872
Buku
[13] Atmasasmita, R. (2006). Pengantar Hukum Pidana Internasional. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
[14] Cassese, A. (2003). Internasional Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[15] Kittichaisaree, K. (2001). International Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press
[16] Muladi. (2011). Statuta Roma 1998 Tentang Mahkamah Pidana Internasional Dalam Kerangka Hukum Pidana Internasional dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kerangka Hukum Pidana Nasional. Bandung: Alumni.
[17] Robertson, G. (2002). Kejahatan Terhadap Kemanusiaan: Perjuangan Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Global. Jakarta: Komisi Hak Asasi Manusia.
[18] Shaw, M. N. (2008). Hukum Internasional. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[19] Suarda, I. G. W. (2012). Hukum Pidana Internasional Sebuah Pengantar. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
[20] Widyawati, A. (2014). Hukum Pidana Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Online/World Wide Web dan Lain-Lain
[21] BBC. (2015). Palestina Anggota Mahkamah Kriminal Internasional. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia/2015/04/150401_palestina_mahkamah.
[22] International Criminal Court. (2020). Preliminary Examinations. Retrieved from https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/pe.aspx (Diakses pada 24 Januari 2020).
[23] International Criminal Court. (2020). Situations Under Investigation. Retrieved from https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/situation.aspx (Diakses pada 24 Januari 2020)
[24] Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat. (2015). Kajian Ratifikasi Statuta Roma 1998. Retrieved from https://advokasi.elsam.or.id/assets/2015/09/00000000_Kajian_Ratifikasi-statuta-roma-1998_ELSAM.pdf.
[25] the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Global Institute for the Prevention of Aggression. (2020). Status of Ratification and implementation of the Kampala Amendments on the Crime of Aggression. Retrieved from https://crimeofaggression.info/the-role-of-states/status-of-ratification-and-implementation/.
: 8762 times
Download : 2369 times
HTML | Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
| 1. | Title | Title of document | Penegakkan Yurisdiksi International Criminal Court atas Kejahatan Agresi Pasca Kampala Amendments Diadopsi dalam Rome Statute |
| 2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country |
Apripari Irham; Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung; Indonesia |
| 3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
| 3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Jurisdiction of Internasional Criminal Court; Crimes of Aggeession; Kampala Amendments. |
| 4. | Description | Abstract | Until the entry into force of the Rome Statute, the definition of the crime of aggression was not also found in it. This leaves the International Criminal Court (ICC) without jurisdiction over crimes of aggression. The absence of ICC jurisdiction over crimes of aggression has resulted in military aggression that has not been processed by the ICC during the time when the proxy war / cold war was initiated. This means that the violation of delicto jus gentium juice is allowed even after the ICC has been established. This study aims: (1) to identify and identify the definition, limitations, and jurisdiction of the ICC for crimes of aggression; and (2) to determine the enforcement of ICC jurisdiction over crimes of aggression after the Kampala Amendments were adopted into the Rome Statute. The research method uses a type of normative research with a statutory approach and a historical approach. The results show that the ICC's definition, limitations, and jurisdiction over the crime of aggression have existed in the Rome Statute since Kampala Amendments were adopted into the Rome Statute. However, until now the enforcement of the ICC's jurisdiction over crimes of aggression has not been carried out concretely. |
| 5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
| 6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
| 7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2020-12-30 |
| 8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
| 8. | Type | Type | |
| 9. | Format | File format | PDF, HTML |
| 10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/272 |
| 10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/sasi.v26i4.272 |
| 11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | SASI; Vol 26, No 4 (2020): Volume 26 Nomor 4, Oktober - Desember 2020 |
| 12. | Language | English=en | en |
| 13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
| 14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
| 15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
License: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2020 Apripari Irham
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
