Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perikanan (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan)

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
(2) Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia

Abstract
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v26i2.280
Published
2020-06-04
How To Cite
@article{SASI280, author = {Astuti Fadillah and Muhammad Al Aspary}, title = {Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perikanan (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan)}, journal = {SASI}, volume = {26}, number = {2}, year = {2020}, keywords = {Fisheries Crime; Criminal Law Enforcement; Criminal Liability}, abstract = {For the fisheries sector in Indonesia, Law No. 31 of 2004 Jo. Law No. 45 of 2009 concerning Fisheries and in the Philippines the 1998 Philippine Fisheries Code applies, which is a regulation governing prison administration. Indonesian fisheries law has not yet enacted a ban on rare and endangered species. The Philippine fisheries law does not yet impose legal sanctions to cancel permit documents. The formulation of an emergency prison sentence or a Philippine fisheries law fine is relatively heavier than Indonesia. For the concept of accountability of the court by the two countries still imposes court responsibility only on corporate management. Law enforcement in the field of fisheries in Indonesia and the Philippines can be more effective on the prohibition of certain activities or activities related to liability related to relationships that can be accounted for, so that they can be accounted for in the right way, to help and overcome problems related to fisheries.}, issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {225--241} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v26i2.280}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/280} }
Buku
[1] Amiruddin & Asikin, H. Z. (2008). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.
[2] Adji, I. S. (2011). Pergeseran Hukum Pidana, Jakarta : Diadit Media Press.
[3] Arief, B. N. (2011). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta : Rajawali Pers..
[4] Bouman, P. J. (1961). Sosiologi Pengertian Dan Masalah. Semarang: Yayasan Kanisius.
[5] Cruz, P. D. (1993). A Modern Approach to Comparative Law. Boston : Kluwer.
[6] Fauzi, A. (2005) Kebijakan Perikanan dan Kelautan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
[7] Krier, J. E. dalam Hardjasoemantri, K. (1993). Hukum Tata Lingkungan Edisi Kelima Cetakan Kesepuluh. Yogyakarta : Gadjah Mada University Press.
[8] Muladi & Priyatno, D. (2007). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta : Kencana.
[9] Parthiana, I W. (2003). Hukum Pidana Internasional Dan Ekstradisi. Bandung : Yrama Widya.
[10] Pakes, F. (2010). Comparative Criminal Justice. Cullompton : Willan Publishing.
[11] Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : UI-Press.
[12] Syaukani, I & Thohari, A. (2004). Dasar-Dasar Politik Hukum, Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.
[13] Surachman, R. M, & Maringka, J. S. (2015). Peran Jaksa Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Kawasan Asia Pasifik. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.
[14] Surachman, R. M. Dkk. (2015) Eksistensi Kejaksaan Dalam Konstitusi Di berbagai Negara. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.
[15] Widodo, J dan Suadi. (2006). Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Perikanan Laut. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
[16] Wijayanta, T & Firmansyah, H. (2011). Perbedaan Pendapat Dalam Putusan Pengadilan. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Yustisia.
Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi dan Lain-Lain
[17] Santoso, T. (2007). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Depok: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Indonesia.
Online/World Wide Web
[18] http://www.fish.govt.nz/ennz/Press/Southland+company+and+director+sentenced+on+fishing+reporting+charges.htm. (Diakses pada tanggal 3 Mei 2019).
[19] https://psa.gov.ph/fisheries-situationer. (Diakses pada tanggal 3 Mei 2019).
[20] http://www.pulauseribu.co/2011/10/krisis-perikanan-dunia.html. (Diakses pada tanggal 3 Mei 2019)
[21] Sandra Conchie (Ed), $22.500 Fine For illegal Market’s Fish, <http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10833319>. (Diakses pada tanggal 3 Mei 2019).
Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
1. | Title | Title of document | Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perikanan (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan) |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Astuti Nur Fadillah; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura; Indonesia |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Muhammad Insan Anshari Al Aspary; Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta; Indonesia |
3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Fisheries Crime; Criminal Law Enforcement; Criminal Liability |
4. | Description | Abstract | For the fisheries sector in Indonesia, Law No. 31 of 2004 Jo. Law No. 45 of 2009 concerning Fisheries and in the Philippines the 1998 Philippine Fisheries Code applies, which is a regulation governing prison administration. Indonesian fisheries law has not yet enacted a ban on rare and endangered species. The Philippine fisheries law does not yet impose legal sanctions to cancel permit documents. The formulation of an emergency prison sentence or a Philippine fisheries law fine is relatively heavier than Indonesia. For the concept of accountability of the court by the two countries still imposes court responsibility only on corporate management. Law enforcement in the field of fisheries in Indonesia and the Philippines can be more effective on the prohibition of certain activities or activities related to liability related to relationships that can be accounted for, so that they can be accounted for in the right way, to help and overcome problems related to fisheries. |
5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura |
6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2020-06-04 |
8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
8. | Type | Type | |
9. | Format | File format | |
10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/280 |
10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/sasi.v26i2.280 |
11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | SASI; Vol 26, No 2 (2020): Volume 26 Nomor 2, April - Juni 2020 |
12. | Language | English=en | en |
13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
License: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Copyright (c) 2020 Astuti Nur Fadillah, Muhammad Insan Anshari Al Aspary

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.