Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perikanan (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan)

Astuti Nur Fadillah; Muhammad Insan Anshari Al Aspary

doi:10.47268/sasi.v26i2.280

Authors

Astuti Nur Fadillah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
Muhammad Insan Anshari Al Aspary Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i2.280

Keywords:

Fisheries Crime, Criminal Law Enforcement, Criminal Liability

Abstract

For the fisheries sector in Indonesia, Law No. 31 of 2004 Jo. Law No. 45 of 2009 concerning Fisheries and in the Philippines the 1998 Philippine Fisheries Code applies, which is a regulation governing prison administration. Indonesian fisheries law has not yet enacted a ban on rare and endangered species. The Philippine fisheries law does not yet impose legal sanctions to cancel permit documents. The formulation of an emergency prison sentence or a Philippine fisheries law fine is relatively heavier than Indonesia. For the concept of accountability of the court by the two countries still imposes court responsibility only on corporate management. Law enforcement in the field of fisheries in Indonesia and the Philippines can be more effective on the prohibition of certain activities or activities related to liability related to relationships that can be accounted for, so that they can be accounted for in the right way, to help and overcome problems related to fisheries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics

References

Buku

[1] Amiruddin & Asikin, H. Z. (2008). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.

[2] Adji, I. S. (2011). Pergeseran Hukum Pidana, Jakarta : Diadit Media Press.

[3] Arief, B. N. (2011). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta : Rajawali Pers..

[4] Bouman, P. J. (1961). Sosiologi Pengertian Dan Masalah. Semarang: Yayasan Kanisius.

[5] Cruz, P. D. (1993). A Modern Approach to Comparative Law. Boston : Kluwer.

[6] Fauzi, A. (2005) Kebijakan Perikanan dan Kelautan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

[7] Krier, J. E. dalam Hardjasoemantri, K. (1993). Hukum Tata Lingkungan Edisi Kelima Cetakan Kesepuluh. Yogyakarta : Gadjah Mada University Press.

[8] Muladi & Priyatno, D. (2007). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta : Kencana.

[9] Parthiana, I W. (2003). Hukum Pidana Internasional Dan Ekstradisi. Bandung : Yrama Widya.

[10] Pakes, F. (2010). Comparative Criminal Justice. Cullompton : Willan Publishing.

[11] Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : UI-Press.

[12] Syaukani, I & Thohari, A. (2004). Dasar-Dasar Politik Hukum, Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.

[13] Surachman, R. M, & Maringka, J. S. (2015). Peran Jaksa Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Kawasan Asia Pasifik. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.

[14] Surachman, R. M. Dkk. (2015) Eksistensi Kejaksaan Dalam Konstitusi Di berbagai Negara. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.

[15] Widodo, J dan Suadi. (2006). Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Perikanan Laut. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

[16] Wijayanta, T & Firmansyah, H. (2011). Perbedaan Pendapat Dalam Putusan Pengadilan. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Yustisia.

Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi dan Lain-Lain

[17] Santoso, T. (2007). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Depok: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Indonesia.

Online/World Wide Web

[18] http://www.fish.govt.nz/ennz/Press/Southland+company+and+director+sentenced+on+fishing+reporting+charges.htm. (Diakses pada tanggal 3 Mei 2019).

[19] https://psa.gov.ph/fisheries-situationer. (Diakses pada tanggal 3 Mei 2019).

[20] http://www.pulauseribu.co/2011/10/krisis-perikanan-dunia.html. (Diakses pada tanggal 3 Mei 2019)

[21] Sandra Conchie (Ed), $22.500 Fine For illegal Market’s Fish, <http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10833319>. (Diakses pada tanggal 3 Mei 2019).