Praktik Eksekusi Riil Tanah Milik Masyarakat Adat Sunda Wiwitan
), Sandi Yusta Hawari(2)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
At the time of the riil execution, it was not uncommon to encounter obstacles which caused the execution to not be carried out. One of them is the case of the Supreme Court Decision Number 2394 K/Pdt/2010. Therefore the researcher wants to examine the things that cause riil execution cannot be carried out in terms of civil procedural law and what legal actions can be carried out by the applicant for execution due to riil execution that cannot be carried out in connection with a civil law. The research method used is a normative juridical,analytical methods used in the data are qualitative normative. Based on the research, it can be concluded that what caused the riil execution of the Supreme Court's Decision Number 2394 K/PDT/2010 on 12 January 2012 could not be implemented because of the resistance carried out by the parties executed and third parties carried out by the Sunda Wiwitan indigenous people by carrying out physical resistance which caused casualties to the execution, resistance efforts are carried out to obstruct the process of execution and Legal actions that can be carried out by the applicant for execution due to riil execution that cannot be carried out that is by way of the applicant's execution can submit a request for execution again to the Chairperson of the Kuningan District Court to carry out the second execution.
Keywords
DOI
10.47268/sasi.v26i3.285
Published
2020-09-21
How To Cite
@article{SASI285,
author = {Hazar Kusmayanti and Sandi Hawari},
title = {Praktik Eksekusi Riil Tanah Milik Masyarakat Adat Sunda Wiwitan},
journal = {SASI},
volume = {26},
number = {3},
year = {2020},
keywords = {Real Execution; Land; Custom Society},
abstract = {At the time of the riil execution, it was not uncommon to encounter obstacles which caused the execution to not be carried out. One of them is the case of the Supreme Court Decision Number 2394 K/Pdt/2010. Therefore the researcher wants to examine the things that cause riil execution cannot be carried out in terms of civil procedural law and what legal actions can be carried out by the applicant for execution due to riil execution that cannot be carried out in connection with a civil law. The research method used is a normative juridical,analytical methods used in the data are qualitative normative. Based on the research, it can be concluded that what caused the riil execution of the Supreme Court's Decision Number 2394 K/PDT/2010 on 12 January 2012 could not be implemented because of the resistance carried out by the parties executed and third parties carried out by the Sunda Wiwitan indigenous people by carrying out physical resistance which caused casualties to the execution, resistance efforts are carried out to obstruct the process of execution and Legal actions that can be carried out by the applicant for execution due to riil execution that cannot be carried out that is by way of the applicant's execution can submit a request for execution again to the Chairperson of the Kuningan District Court to carry out the second execution.},
issn = {2614-2961}, pages = {341--355} doi = {10.47268/sasi.v26i3.285},
url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/285}
}
[1] Basuki Prasetyo.A, (2019). "Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Masyarakat Adat Karuhun Urang (AKUR) Di Desa Cigugur Kuningan Melalui Lembaga Peradilan", Law, Development & Justice Review, Vol 2 (1).
https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v2i1.5003
[2] Hipan N, (2018) "Problematika Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Di Lokasi Tanjung Sari Kabupaten Banggai", Jurnal Law Reform, 14 (2).
https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v14i2.20870
[3] Farakhiyah R, Irfan M, (2019), "Eksistensi Masyarakat Adat Tergerus Oleh Kebutuhan Zaman", Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik, 1, (1)
https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v1i1.20892
[4] Jumaidah Aulia N, (2016) "Eksekusi Riil Terhadap Putusan Hakim Yang Telah Mempunyai Kekuatan Tetap Pada Perkara Perdata No.20/P.dt.G/2011/PN.Pbr Di PN Kelas IA Pekan Baru", JOM Fakultas Hukum, III (2).
[5] Latifiani : "Permasalahan Pelaksanaan Putusan Hakim", (2015) JHAPER: 1(1). Kusmayanti H, Sandra. E, dan Novianti. R, (2015), "Sidang Keliling dan Prinsip-prinsip HukumAcara Perdata: Studi Pengamatan Sidang Keliling di Pengadilan Agama Tasikmalaya", JHAPER, 1, (2)
[6] Kusmayanti, H. (2016). "Penerapan dan Permasalahan Eksekusi Pesawat Terbang Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Perjanjian Perawatan Mesin Pesawat". Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, Vol. (1).
https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v1n1.3
[7] Rahmawati, R, (2019). "Eksekusi Aset Debitor yang Berada Di Luar Negeri dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan", SASI. 25 (2) : 121-132, DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i2.217
https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i2.217
[8] Suyatno. A, (2014) "Perlawanan Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Berdasarkan Titel Eksetorial", Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 3 (1).
https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.3.1.2014.1-10
[9] Wahyu Wikanto.A, Yudowibowo. S, Harjono, (2014) "Eksekusi Riil Dalam Perkara Perdata Tentang Pengosongan Tanah Dan Bangunan Rumah", Jurnal Verstek, 2 (2).
[10] Khaidir Muhammad. A, (1992) Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, cetakan V, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti,
[11] Yahya Harahap.M, (1997), Beberapa Tinjauan Mengenai Sistem Peradilan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Bandung: Citra Abadi.
[12] Soeroso,(2010) Hukum Acara Perdata lengkap dan praktis HIR,RBg dan Yurisprudensi, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
[13] Sarwono, (2016) Hukum Acara Perdata Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
[14] Sutantio R, Oeripkartawinata I, (2009), Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Bandung: Mandar Maju.
[15] Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, (2006) Yogyakarta: Liberty
: 1748 times
Download : 2040 times
Cited-By:
1. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Beritikad Baik yang Dirugikan Atas Penetapan Eksekusi Berdasarkan Akta Perdamaian
Fiona Theresia, Lanny Kusumawati, Erly Aristo
Notaire vol: 5 issue: 2 first page: 235 year: 2022
Type: Journal [View Source]
2. Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Ulayat pada Kawasan Hutan
Adonia Ivonne Laturette
SASI vol: 27 issue: 1 first page: 102 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]
Copyright (c) 2020 Hazar Kusmayanti, Sandi Yusta Hawari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Cited-By:
1. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Beritikad Baik yang Dirugikan Atas Penetapan Eksekusi Berdasarkan Akta Perdamaian
Fiona Theresia, Lanny Kusumawati, Erly Aristo
Notaire vol: 5 issue: 2 first page: 235 year: 2022
Type: Journal [View Source]
2. Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Ulayat pada Kawasan Hutan
Adonia Ivonne Laturette
SASI vol: 27 issue: 1 first page: 102 year: 2021
Type: Journal [View Source]
Email this article 
