1. Home
  2. Volume 31 Issue 4, December 2025 (in-progress Issue)
  3. Azwar

Legal Pluralism in the Colonial Era: The Influence of Economic Globalization on the Elimination of Poenale Sanctie and Customary Law

Tengku Keizerina Devi Azwar(1email), Bazarova Dildora Baxadirovna(2)


(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia orcid
(2) Department of Criminal Procedure of Law and Criminalistics, Tashkent State University of Law, Tashkent, Uzbekistan orcid
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction: From the late nineteenth to the early twentieth century, the expansion of large-scale plantations driven by global capital created a dual legal order in which colonial law was positioned as the dominant system, while customary law became subordinated. The central issues explored are how economic globalization shaped the configuration of legal pluralism and what factors contributed to the abolition of the poenale sanctie within the colonial legal system.

Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to analyze the dynamics between colonial and customary law in the context of global economic change and to investigate the underlying causes of the abolition of the poenale sanctie.

Methods of the Research: This is normative legal research employing a conceptual approach. Data were drawn from primary legal sources, including colonial regulations and official archives; secondary legal sources, such as academic literature; and tertiary supporting materials. The data were then analyzed using a qualitative-descriptive method.

Results of the Research: The findings reveal that the abolition of the poenale sanctie was influenced by both international and internal factors. External pressures included global public opinion and the rise of ethical politics, while internal drivers involved labor resistance, humanitarian advocacy, economic efficiency considerations, and the evolution of modern criminal law. The novelty of this research lies in its analysis of the implications of the abolition of the poenale sanctie for the status of customary law in East Sumatra. The study demonstrates that despite reforms within the colonial legal system, customary law did not gain significant recognition but remained marginalized. Hence, this research contributes to the discourse on colonial legal pluralism by highlighting the tension between economic globalization, colonial governance, and the persistence of customary law.

Keywords


Legal Pluralism; Colonialism; Poenale Sanctie; Customary Law.


DOI


10.47268/sasi.v31i4.3392

Published


2025-10-25

How To Cite


APA: Azwar, T.K., & Baxadirovna, B.D. (2025). Legal Pluralism in the Colonial Era: The Influence of Economic Globalization on the Elimination of Poenale Sanctie and Customary Law. SASI, 31(4), 315-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v31i4.3392.
IEEE: T.K. Azwar, and B.D. Baxadirovna, "Legal Pluralism in the Colonial Era: The Influence of Economic Globalization on the Elimination of Poenale Sanctie and Customary Law", SASI, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 315-325, Oct. 2025. Accessed on: Oct. 29, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v31i4.3392
Harvard: Azwar, T.K., and Baxadirovna, B.D., (2025). "Legal Pluralism in the Colonial Era: The Influence of Economic Globalization on the Elimination of Poenale Sanctie and Customary Law". SASI, Volume 31(4), pp. 315-325. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v31i4.3392 (Accessed on: 29 October 2025)
Chicago: Azwar, Tengku Keizerina Devi, and Bazarova Dildora Baxadirovna. "Legal Pluralism in the Colonial Era: The Influence of Economic Globalization on the Elimination of Poenale Sanctie and Customary Law." SASI 31, no. 4 (October 25, 2025): 315-325. Accessed October 29, 2025. doi:10.47268/sasi.v31i4.3392
Vancouver: Azwar TK, Baxadirovna BD. Legal Pluralism in the Colonial Era: The Influence of Economic Globalization on the Elimination of Poenale Sanctie and Customary Law. SASI [Internet]. 2025 Oct 25 [cited 2025 Oct 29];31(4):315-325. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v31i4.3392
MLA 8th: Azwar, Tengku Keizerina Devi, and Bazarova Dildora Baxadirovna. "Legal Pluralism in the Colonial Era: The Influence of Economic Globalization on the Elimination of Poenale Sanctie and Customary Law." SASI, vol. 31, no. 4, 25 Oct. 2025, pp. 315-325, doi:10.47268/sasi.v31i4.3392. Accessed 29 Oct. 2025.
BibTeX: 
@article{SASI3392,
		author = {Tengku Azwar and Bazarova Baxadirovna},
		title = {Legal Pluralism in the Colonial Era: The Influence of Economic Globalization on the Elimination of Poenale Sanctie and Customary Law},
		journal = {SASI},
		volume = {31},
		number = {4},
		year = {2025},
		keywords = {Legal Pluralism; Colonialism; Poenale Sanctie; Customary Law.},
		abstract = {Introduction: From the late nineteenth to the early twentieth century, the expansion of large-scale plantations driven by global capital created a dual legal order in which colonial law was positioned as the dominant system, while customary law became subordinated. The central issues explored are how economic globalization shaped the configuration of legal pluralism and what factors contributed to the abolition of the poenale sanctie within the colonial legal system.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to analyze the dynamics between colonial and customary law in the context of global economic change and to investigate the underlying causes of the abolition of the poenale sanctie.Methods of the Research: This is normative legal research employing a conceptual approach. Data were drawn from primary legal sources, including colonial regulations and official archives; secondary legal sources, such as academic literature; and tertiary supporting materials. The data were then analyzed using a qualitative-descriptive method.Results of the Research: The findings reveal that the abolition of the poenale sanctie was influenced by both international and internal factors. External pressures included global public opinion and the rise of ethical politics, while internal drivers involved labor resistance, humanitarian advocacy, economic efficiency considerations, and the evolution of modern criminal law. The novelty of this research lies in its analysis of the implications of the abolition of the poenale sanctie for the status of customary law in East Sumatra. The study demonstrates that despite reforms within the colonial legal system, customary law did not gain significant recognition but remained marginalized. Hence, this research contributes to the discourse on colonial legal pluralism by highlighting the tension between economic globalization, colonial governance, and the persistence of customary law.},
				issn = {2614-2961},		pages = {315--325}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v31i4.3392},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/3392}
		}
RefWorks:

   

Alviolita, Fifink Praiseda. “Perlindungan Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat Terhadap Perbuatan Kriminalisasi Dalam Mempertahankan Tanah Ulayat.” Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia 1, no. 1 (2022): 69–77. https://doi.org/10.37631/JRKHM.V1I1.2.

Aprianita, Triana, and Johan Wahyudi. “Menolak Tunduk Hak Tawan Karang Dalam Diskursus Hukum Pelayaran Internasional Di Hindia Belanda Di Akhir Abad XIX.” The International Journal of Pegon : Islam Nusantara Civilization 13, no. 02 (2024): 107–30. https://doi.org/10.51925/INC.V13I02.121.

Aziz, Suci Karlina, Lidin Wiwah Jaya Putra, Kasful Anwar Us, and Sya’roni. “Pengaruh Kebijakan Politik Etis Pemerintah Kolonial Belanda Terhadap Keberadaan Lembaga Pendidikan Islam Di Nusantara.” Jurnal Budi Pekerti Agama Islam 2, no. 5 (2024): 244–52. https://doi.org/10.61132/JBPAI.V2I5.556.

Bahari, Syaiful, Muhammad Panca Prana Mustaqim Sinaga, La Ode Mbunai, and Zahra Malinda Putri. “Rekonstruksi Pemaknaan Hak Menguasai Negara Menurut Pasal 33 Ayat (3) UUD 1945.” JUSTLAW : Journal Science and Theory of Law 2, no. 01 (2025): 46–55. https://ojs.sains.ac.id/index.php/Justlaw/article/view/102.

Carwan, and Sari Indah Lestari. “Perkembangan Aneka Warna Hukum (Rechtbedeling) Di Indonesia: Pluralisme Hukum Waris Di Indonesia.” Journal Syntax Idea 5, no. 12 (2023): 2381–94.

Damanik, Erond Litno. “Perdagangan Dan Pemertahanan Kuli Di Perkebunan: Opium Di Deli, 1870-1942.” JASMERAH: Journal of Education and Historical Studies 2, no. 1 (2020): 1–19.

Fadhlillah, Moh Nauval. “Kapitalisme Dan Terjadinya Penjarahan Tanah Di Indonesia.” COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 2, no. 05 (2022): 16–23. https://doi.org/10.69957/CR.V2I5.661.

Hasanah, Uswatun, Faisar Ananda Arfa, and Ibnu Radwan Siddiq Turnip. “Hukum Keluarga Islam Pada Masa Penjajahan Belanda.” Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Sosial Keagamaan 2, no. 4 (2025): 920–27. https://jurnal.ittc.web.id/index.php/jkis/article/view/2842.

Ikhsan, Edy. Konflik Tanah Ulayat Dan Pluralisme Hukum. Cetakan ke. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2021.

Itawan, Devi. “Ekspansi Perkebunan Dan Pertumbuhan Penduduk Di Sumatra Timur, 1863-1942.” Handep Jurnal Sejarah Dan Budaya 6, no. 2 (2023): 109–30.

Khalid, Zuhriati, and Sugih Ayu Pratitis. “Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Tenaga Kerja Wanita Sektor Umkm Di Kota Medan.” Law Jurnal 1, no. 2 (2021): 13–30. https://doi.org/10.46576/LJ.V1I2.1127.

Maulana, Moh., Silvoni Kakoe, Suryani Intan Puwa, Anastasia Sarjono, and Sofyan Piyo. “Kedudukan Self-Determination Dalam Konteks Otonomi Dan Pengakuan Identitas Kultural Masyarakat Adat Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis (J-KUMBIS) 3, no. 1 (2025): 53–70. https://doi.org/10.37606/J-KUMBIS.V3I1.286.

Narwadan, Theresia N.A, Arief Fahmi Lubis, and H. Abd Hakim. Perkembangannya, Teori Hukum Positif Teori Komprehensif Dan. Edited by Sepriano and Efitra. Cetakan Pe. Jambi: Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2025.

Nasrullah, Jalaluddin, and Ilham Akbar. “Teori Hukum Sejarah (Historical Legal Theory) Di Indonesia: Kajian Sistematis Melalui Metode Systematic Literature Review | Journal of Law And Nation.” Journal Of Law And Nation 4, no. 1 (2025): 120–33. https://joln.my.id/index.php/joln/article/view/195.

Nugraha, Roby Satya, Edi Rohaedi, Nandang Kusnadi, and Abid Abid. “The Transformation of Indonesia’s Criminal Law System: Comprehensive Comparison between the Old and New Penal Codes.” Reformasi Hukum 29, no. 1 (2025): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.46257/JRH.V29I1.1169.

Panggabean, Putri Dian Sari. “Perlawanan Pers Terhadap Poenale Sanctie (Sanksi Pidana) Di Deli, Sumatera Timur (1916-1930).” Fakultas Adab dan Humaniora UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2024. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/84249.

Pelly, Usman, and Ratna M. S. Sejarah Pertumbuhan Pemerintahan Kesultanan Langkat, Deli, Dan Serdang. Edited by Ratih Baiduri. Medan: Perdana Publishing, 2022.

Piswatama, Dipo, Parlaungan Gabriel Siahaan, and Sri Hadiningrum. “Mengekspos Luka Tersembunyi Kritik Terhadap Perjanjian Kerja Dan Dampak Psikologinya Pada Tenaga Kerja Buruh Di Desa Perkebunan Pernantian.” Journal of Education Research 5, no. 3 (2024): 2643–48. https://doi.org/10.37985/JER.V5I3.1227.

Rambe, Sabda Firmansyah, Laila Rohani, and Abdul Karim Batubara. “Sejarah Kesultanan Bilah Pada Masa Kolonial Belanda, 1865-1942.” Journal of History and Cultural Heritage 3, no. 1 (2022): 25–32.

Renngur, Ramdani Husein. “Analisis Ideologi Dibalik Kebijakan Reforma Agraria Pada Masa Orde Lama (1945-1965) Dan Orde Baru (1965-1968).” Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains 2, no. 5 (2023): 378–88.

Simbolon, Yolanda. “Analisis Hubungan Kemitraan Antara Kurir Dan Perusahaan Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Ditinjau Dari Doktrin Undue Influence.” SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS 7, no. 2 (2022): 126–47. https://doi.org/10.37477/SEV.V7I2.373.

Suharno, Andika Satria Yoga, Sutiyah Sutiyah, and Dadan Adi Kurniawan. “Dinamika Sosial-Ekonomi Dan Budaya Dalam Transmigrasi Penduduk Jawa Tengah Ke Lampung Masa Kolonial Belanda (1905 – 1941).” Candi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Penelitian Sejarah 24, no. 1 (2024): 12–26. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/candi/article/view/91862.

Utama, Tody S.J., Rikardo Simarmata, Jacqueline A.C. Vel, and Adriaan W. Bedner. “New Ways of Teaching Adat (Customary) Law at Indonesian Law Schools.” The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies 4, no. 1 (2024): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.54828/ijsls.2024v4n1.2.

Wicaksono, Bayu. “Migrasi Orang Jawa Ke Asahan Pada Masa Kolonial.” MUKADIMAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sejarah, Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial 5, no. 1 (2021): 54–62. https://doi.org/10.30743/mkd.v5i1.3439.

Zulyanti, Mutiara, Zuriatin, Syahbuddin, and Gafar Hidayat. “Dampak Kebijakan Agraria Pemerintah Kolonial Belanda Terhadap Kondisi Sosial Ekonomi Petani Di Pulau Jawa, 1870-1940.” Fajar Historia: Jurnal Ilmu Sejarah Dan Pendidikan 9, no. 2 (2025): 336–49. https://doi.org/10.29408/FHS.V9I2.31774.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 18 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 5 times



 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Legal Pluralism in the Colonial Era: The Influence of Economic Globalization on the Elimination of Poenale Sanctie and Customary Law
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Tengku Keizerina Devi Azwar; Faculty of Law, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan; Indonesia orcid
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Bazarova Dildora Baxadirovna; Department of Criminal Procedure of Law and Criminalistics, Tashkent State University of Law, Tashkent; Uzbekistan orcid
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s) Legal Pluralism; Colonialism; Poenale Sanctie; Customary Law.
 
4. Description Abstract Introduction: From the late nineteenth to the early twentieth century, the expansion of large-scale plantations driven by global capital created a dual legal order in which colonial law was positioned as the dominant system, while customary law became subordinated. The central issues explored are how economic globalization shaped the configuration of legal pluralism and what factors contributed to the abolition of the poenale sanctie within the colonial legal system.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to analyze the dynamics between colonial and customary law in the context of global economic change and to investigate the underlying causes of the abolition of the poenale sanctie.Methods of the Research: This is normative legal research employing a conceptual approach. Data were drawn from primary legal sources, including colonial regulations and official archives; secondary legal sources, such as academic literature; and tertiary supporting materials. The data were then analyzed using a qualitative-descriptive method.Results of the Research: The findings reveal that the abolition of the poenale sanctie was influenced by both international and internal factors. External pressures included global public opinion and the rise of ethical politics, while internal drivers involved labor resistance, humanitarian advocacy, economic efficiency considerations, and the evolution of modern criminal law. The novelty of this research lies in its analysis of the implications of the abolition of the poenale sanctie for the status of customary law in East Sumatra. The study demonstrates that despite reforms within the colonial legal system, customary law did not gain significant recognition but remained marginalized. Hence, this research contributes to the discourse on colonial legal pluralism by highlighting the tension between economic globalization, colonial governance, and the persistence of customary law.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2025-10-25
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/3392
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier 10.47268/sasi.v31i4.3392
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) SASI; Volume 31 Issue 4, December 2025 (in-progress Issue)
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

Copyright:

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.

2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)

 

License: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


Copyright (c) 2025 Tengku Keizerina Devi Azwar, Bazarova Dildora Baxadirovna

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.