Restrukturisasi Budaya Hukum Kejaksaan Dalam Penuntutan Sebagai Independensi di Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia

Appludnopsanji Appludnopsanji; Pujiyono Pujiyono

doi:10.47268/sasi.v26i4.359

Restrukturisasi Budaya Hukum Kejaksaan Dalam Penuntutan Sebagai Independensi di Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia

Appludnopsanji Appludnopsanji⁽¹⁾, Pujiyono Pujiyono⁽²⁾

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
email

Corresponding Author

Abstract

The position of the prosecutor's office which is under two powers namely executive and judiciary causes the prosecutor's office to become an institution that is not independent and free, thus causing blemishes to commit fraud by prosecutors. This study aims to find out how the reality of the independence of prosecutors in prosecution and know how the cultural rearrangement for prosecutors in prosecution as a process of the criminal justice system. Research methods The research method uses normative research through a conceptual approach and a statue approach. The results showed that the ambiguous position of the prosecutor made the prosecutor hesitant in carrying out their duties, was not independent and was not free and there was a judicial mafia. With regard to this condition, re-structuring of the prosecutor's independence in prosecution is needed. This is intended so that the prosecutor's office becomes an independent institution by integrally restructuring the legal culture together with other criminal justice sub-systems through a religious approach, contextual approach and comparative approach

Keywords

Prosecutor; Independence; Criminal Justice System.

DOI

10.47268/sasi.v26i4.359

Published

2020-12-30

How To Cite

APA: Appludnopsanji, A., & Pujiyono, P. (2020). Restrukturisasi Budaya Hukum Kejaksaan Dalam Penuntutan Sebagai Independensi di Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. SASI, 26(4), 571-581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i4.359.

IEEE: A. Appludnopsanji, and P. Pujiyono, "Restrukturisasi Budaya Hukum Kejaksaan Dalam Penuntutan Sebagai Independensi di Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia", SASI, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 571-581, Dec. 2020. Accessed on: Apr. 24, 2025. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i4.359

Harvard: Appludnopsanji, A., and Pujiyono, P., (2020). "Restrukturisasi Budaya Hukum Kejaksaan Dalam Penuntutan Sebagai Independensi di Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia". SASI, Volume 26(4), pp. 571-581. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i4.359 (Accessed on: 24 April 2025)

Chicago: Appludnopsanji, Appludnopsanji, and Pujiyono Pujiyono. "Restrukturisasi Budaya Hukum Kejaksaan Dalam Penuntutan Sebagai Independensi di Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia." SASI 26, no. 4 (December 20, 2020): 571-581. Accessed April 24, 2025. doi:10.47268/sasi.v26i4.359

Vancouver: Appludnopsanji A, Pujiyono P. Restrukturisasi Budaya Hukum Kejaksaan Dalam Penuntutan Sebagai Independensi di Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. SASI [Internet]. 2020 Dec 30 [cited 2025 Apr 24];26(4):571-581. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i4.359

MLA 8th: Appludnopsanji, Appludnopsanji, and Pujiyono Pujiyono. "Restrukturisasi Budaya Hukum Kejaksaan Dalam Penuntutan Sebagai Independensi di Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia." SASI, vol. 26, no. 4, 20 Dec. 2020, pp. 571-581, doi:10.47268/sasi.v26i4.359. Accessed 24 Apr. 2025.

BibTeX:

@article{SASI359,
		author = {Appludnopsanji Appludnopsanji and Pujiyono Pujiyono},
		title = {Restrukturisasi Budaya Hukum Kejaksaan Dalam Penuntutan Sebagai Independensi di Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia},
		journal = {SASI},
		volume = {26},
		number = {4},
		year = {2020},
		keywords = {Prosecutor; Independence; Criminal Justice System.},
		abstract = {The position of the prosecutor's office which is under two powers namely executive and judiciary causes the prosecutor's office to become an institution that is not independent and free, thus causing blemishes to commit fraud by prosecutors. This study aims to find out how the reality of the independence of prosecutors in prosecution and know how the cultural rearrangement for prosecutors in prosecution as a process of the criminal justice system. Research methods The research method uses normative research through a conceptual approach and a statue approach. The results showed that the ambiguous position of the prosecutor made the prosecutor hesitant in carrying out their duties, was not independent and was not free and there was a judicial mafia. With regard to this condition, re-structuring of the prosecutor's independence in prosecution is needed. This is intended so that the prosecutor's office becomes an independent institution by integrally restructuring the legal culture together with other criminal justice sub-systems through a religious approach, contextual approach and comparative approach},
				issn = {2614-2961},		pages = {571--581}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v26i4.359},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/359}
		}

RefWorks:

Citation format: Download Citation:

Jurnal

[1] Al-Azhar, H. F. (2019). "Rekonstruksi Konseptual Peradilan sebagai Revitalisasi Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia". Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v2i1.2446

[2] Ali, M. (2007). "Sistem Peradilan Pidana Progresif; Alternatif dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana". Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 14 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol14.iss2.art2

[3] Ansori, L. (2018). "Reformasi Penegakan Hukum Perspektif Hukum Progresif". Jurnal Yuridis, 4 (2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35586/.v4i2.244 https://doi.org/10.35586/.v4i2.244

[4] Arrsa, R. C. (2014). "Rekonstruksi Politik Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Strategi Penguatan Penyidik Dan Penuntut Umum Independen KPK". Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 3 (3). https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v3i3.32

[5] Ghonu, I. (2015). "Independensi Kejaksaan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia". Justitia Et Pax, 31 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v31i2.1342

[6] Jainah, Z. O. (2011). "Membangun Budaya Hukum Masyarakat Penegak Hukum dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Narkotika". Keadilan Progresif, 2 (2).

[7] Muhammad, M. (2019). "Pemeriksaan Kepala Daerah Yang Terlibat Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi". Jurnal Yustitia, 18 (1).

[8] Muhammad, R. (2009). "Kemandirian Pengadilan Dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum Pidana Menuju Sistem Peradilan Pidana Yang Bebas Dan Bertanggung Jawab". Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 16 (4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss4.art2

[9] Muntaha, M. (2017). "Pengaturan Praperadilan dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia". Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 29 (3). https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.22318

[10] Pilok, D. F. (2013). "Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Jaksa Dalam Peradilan Pidana Menurut Kuhap". Lex Crimen, 2 (4).

[11] Rosita, D. (2018). "Kedudukan Kejaksaan Sebagai Pelaksana Kekuasaan Negara di Bidang Penuntutan dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia". Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 3 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v3i1.862

[12] Saputra, F., Kalo, S., Mulyadi, M., & Hamdan, M. (2014). "Analisis Yuridis Penerbitan Surat Perintah Penghentian Penuntutan oleh Kejaksaan Dikaitkan dengan Asas Oportunitas dan Undang-undang No 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan RI". USU Law Journal, 2 (1).

[13] Sigar, K. S. (2017). "Kemandirian Kejaksaan Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia (Kajian UU No. 16 Tahun 2004)". Lex Et Societatis, 5 (5).

[14] Sumakul, A. E. (2018). "Independensi Kejaksaan Dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001". Lex Crimen, 7 (5).

[15] Warganegara, D. (2017). "Implementasi Konsep Hukum Progresif Dalam Penegakan Hukum Oleh Kepolisian Di Indonesia". Poenale: Jurnal Bagian Hukum Pidana, 5 (3).

[16] Widodo, J. P. (2012). "Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Rangka Penanggulangan Mafia Peradilan". Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.1.200

[17] Windari, R. A. (2011). "Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Perlindungan Anak Di Indonesia (Kajian Normatif Atas Bekerjanya Hukum Dalam Masyarakat)". Media Komunikasi FPIPS, 10 (1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/mkfis.v10i1.1174

[18] Yusyanti, D. (2015). "Strategi Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Pendekatan Politik Hukum, Penegakan Hukum Dan Budaya Hukum". E-Journal Widya Yustisia, 1 (1).

Buku

[19] Anwar Yesmil & Adang. (2011). Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Bandung: Widya Padjadjaran.

[20] Arief, B. N. (2017). RUU KUHP Baru Sebuah Restrukturisasi/Rekonstruksi Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

[21] Arief, B. N. (2019). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu. Semarang: Bahan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

[22] Arief. B. N. (2019). Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Sistem Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Semarang: Bahan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

[23] Kristiana Yudi. (2011). Independensi Kejaksaan dalam Penyidikan Korupsi. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

[24] Pujiyono. (2012). Rekonstruksi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Semarang: Penerbit Pustaka Magister.

[25] Satjipto Rahardjo, (2011). Satjipto Rahardjo Dan Hukum Progresif Urgensi Dan Kritik. Jakarta: Epistema Institue.

Online/World Wide Web dan Lain-Lain

[26] Medistiara, Yulida - detikNews, Deretan Jaksa yang Malah Diadili Karena Kasus Korupsi, diakses pada tanggal 6 Juni 2020 dalam https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4994630/deretan-jaksa-yang-malah-diadili-karena-kasus-korupsi

[27] Teubner, G. (Ed.). (2011). Dilemmas of law in the welfare state. Walter de Gruyter.

Full Text: PDF HTML

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik

: 4850 times
PDF icon PDF

Download : 2317 times HTML icon PDF

Download : 10586 times

Cited-By:

1. PERUBAHAN PERSEPSI JAKSA TERHADAP PRIBADI TERSANGKA DAN TERDAKWA YANG SEDANG DIPERIKSA DARI SISI PSIKOLOGIS
Mukhlis Ridwan, Erdianto Effendi, Maria Maya, Davit Rahmadan
Masalah-Masalah Hukum vol: 52 issue: 1 first page: 1 year: 2023
Type: Journal [View Source]


Dublin Core		PKP Metadata Items	Metadata for this Document

1.	Title	Title of document	Restrukturisasi Budaya Hukum Kejaksaan Dalam Penuntutan Sebagai Independensi di Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Appludnopsanji Appludnopsanji; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang; Indonesia

2.	Creator	Author's name, affiliation, country	Pujiyono Pujiyono; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang; Indonesia

3.	Subject	Discipline(s)

3.	Subject	Keyword(s)	Prosecutor; Independence; Criminal Justice System.

4.	Description	Abstract	The position of the prosecutor's office which is under two powers namely executive and judiciary causes the prosecutor's office to become an institution that is not independent and free, thus causing blemishes to commit fraud by prosecutors. This study aims to find out how the reality of the independence of prosecutors in prosecution and know how the cultural rearrangement for prosecutors in prosecution as a process of the criminal justice system. Research methods The research method uses normative research through a conceptual approach and a statue approach. The results showed that the ambiguous position of the prosecutor made the prosecutor hesitant in carrying out their duties, was not independent and was not free and there was a judicial mafia. With regard to this condition, re-structuring of the prosecutor's independence in prosecution is needed. This is intended so that the prosecutor's office becomes an independent institution by integrally restructuring the legal culture together with other criminal justice sub-systems through a religious approach, contextual approach and comparative approach

5.	Publisher	Organizing agency, location	Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

6.	Contributor	Sponsor(s)

7.	Date	(YYYY-MM-DD)	2020-12-30

8.	Type	Status & genre	Peer-reviewed Article

8.	Type	Type

9.	Format	File format	PDF, HTML

10.	Identifier	Uniform Resource Identifier	https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/359

10.	Identifier	Digital Object Identifier	10.47268/sasi.v26i4.359

11.	Source	Title; vol., no. (year)	SASI; Vol 26, No 4 (2020): Volume 26 Nomor 4, Oktober - Desember 2020

12.	Language	English=en	en

13.	Relation	Supp. Files

14.	Coverage	Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)

15.	Rights	Copyright and permissions	Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy) License: The SASI Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.