Pengaturan Hukum Petisi Online Sebagai Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan

Nurul Safitri(1email), Jantje Tjiptabudy(2), Hendry John Piris(3)


(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Introduction:  People are getting smarter at using the existing media to exercise their right to express opinions, one of which is through online petitions.

Purposes of the Research: to find out the legal arrangements and the implications of online petitions on governance.

Methods of the Research:  This research is a normative legal research. In this study, three approaches to the problem are used, namely the statutory approach, the conceptual approach, and the comparative approach. Sources of data obtained are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is by collecting and grouping them according to their respective parts, both primary, secondary and tertiary laws. All data in this study were analyzed qualitatively.

 Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research :  The results of this study identified that online petitions are electronic mails that are currently popular among the public. However, Indonesia does not yet have specific regulations regarding online petitions. The implications obtained from the online petition platform are able to facilitate as well as involve citizens in voicing their opinions and actively in carrying out the role of citizens by implementing direct democracy, namely the community participating in public management. 

Keywords


Online Petition; Freedom of Opinion; Governance; Internet Technology


DOI


10.47268/tatohi.v2i6.1126

Published


2022-09-19

How To Cite


APA: Safitri, N., Tjiptabudy, J., & Piris, H.J. (2022). Pengaturan Hukum Petisi Online Sebagai Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(6), 631 – 640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i6.1126.
IEEE: N. Safitri, J. Tjiptabudy, and H.J. Piris, "Pengaturan Hukum Petisi Online Sebagai Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan", TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 631 – 640, Sep. 2022. Accessed on: May. 3, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i6.1126
Harvard: Safitri, N., Tjiptabudy, J., and Piris, H.J., (2022). "Pengaturan Hukum Petisi Online Sebagai Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan". TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2(6), pp. 631 – 640. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i6.1126 (Accessed on: 3 May 2024)
Chicago: Safitri, Nurul, Jantje Tjiptabudy, and Hendry John Piris. "Pengaturan Hukum Petisi Online Sebagai Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 6 (August 31, 2022): 631 – 640. Accessed May 3, 2024. doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i6.1126
Vancouver: Safitri N, Tjiptabudy J, Piris HJ. Pengaturan Hukum Petisi Online Sebagai Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk. [Internet]. 2022 Sep 19 [cited 2024 May 3];2(6):631 – 640. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v2i6.1126
MLA 8th: Safitri, Nurul, Jantje Tjiptabudy, and Hendry John Piris. "Pengaturan Hukum Petisi Online Sebagai Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan." TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 2, no. 6, 31 Aug. 2022, pp. 631 – 640, doi:10.47268/tatohi.v2i6.1126. Accessed 3 May. 2024.
BibTeX:
@article{TATOHI1126,
		author = {Nurul Safitri and Jantje Tjiptabudy and Hendry Piris},
		title = {Pengaturan Hukum Petisi Online Sebagai Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan},
		journal = {TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum},
		volume = {2},
		number = {6},
		year = {2022},
		keywords = {Online Petition; Freedom of Opinion; Governance; Internet Technology},
		abstract = {Introduction:  People are getting smarter at using the existing media to exercise their right to express opinions, one of which is through online petitions.Purposes of the Research: to find out the legal arrangements and the implications of online petitions on governance. Methods of the Research:  This research is a normative legal research. In this study, three approaches to the problem are used, namely the statutory approach, the conceptual approach, and the comparative approach. Sources of data obtained are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is by collecting and grouping them according to their respective parts, both primary, secondary and tertiary laws. All data in this study were analyzed qualitatively. Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research :  The results of this study identified that online petitions are electronic mails that are currently popular among the public. However, Indonesia does not yet have specific regulations regarding online petitions. The implications obtained from the online petition platform are able to facilitate as well as involve citizens in voicing their opinions and actively in carrying out the role of citizens by implementing direct democracy, namely the community participating in public management. },
				issn = {2775-619X},		pages = {631--640}			doi = {10.47268/tatohi.v2i6.1126},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1126}
		}
		
RefWorks:

   


Ahmad Faadhila Addiputra dkk, Petisi Daring sebagai Bentuk Partisipasi Warga Negara di Era Digital, Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial 29, no. 2, (2020).

Danu Darmajati, “Di AS dan Korsel, Petisi Online Disediakan oleh Kantor Kepresidenan” Rabu, 10 januari 2019 https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4581190/di-as-dan-korsel-petisi-online-disediakan-oleh-kantor-kepresidenan (diakses pada 18:25 Minggu, 19 Desember 2021).

Liudmilla Vakariuk dan Igor Babin, SIfat Hukum e-petisi, Jurnal Hukum dan Poitik 12, no. 2, (2019).

Mara Ongku Hsb. HAM Dan Kebebasan Berpendapat Dalam UUD 1945. AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (2021): 29 - 40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v2i1.135.

M. Agus Santoso, Hukum, Moral & Keadilan Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.

Merlien Irene Matitaputty. "Kebebasan Beragama Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia." SASI 21, no. 1 (2015): 74-82.

Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman dkk, Mengatur Petisi Di Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan: Upaya Penguatan Posisi Masyarakat Terhadap Negara Dalam Kerangka Perlindungan Kebebasan Berpendapat, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 18, no. 1 (2021).

Muhardi Jaya, Memahami Kebebasan Berpendapat, (diakses dari http://permataft-uh.org/memahami-kebebasan-berpendapat/ pada 10 Januari 2022 pukul 23:48).

Muhammadiah, Partisipasi Publik Sebagai Strategi Mewujudkan Good Governance Otonomi Daerah, Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan 3. no.1 (2013): 57 – 66.

Philipus M Hardjo, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat Indonesia, Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1988.

Rahman Mulyawan, Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia, Bandung: Unpad Press, 2015.

Rahma Simamora “Petisi Online Sebagai Alat Keijakan Advokai: Studi Kasus Change.Org Periode 2015-2016” Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia 6, no 1, (2017): 57 - 67.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1999

Suharno, mengadili kebijakan perspektif demokrasi dan negara hukum, Surakarta: Indotama Solo, 2020.

Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 585 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 1812 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Nurul Safitri, Jantje Tjiptabudy, Hendry John Piris

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.