Penerapan Ajaran Kausalitas Pada Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Yang mengakibatkan Kematian

Lukas Putra Eugara; Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa; Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v4i6.2456

Authors

Lukas Putra Eugara Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i6.2456

Keywords:

Causality Teaching, Traffic Accident, Death

Abstract

Introduction: The teaching of causality in criminal law or better known as a causal relationship is very interesting. There are various theories of causality known in criminal law. These theories were born to answer one important question in criminal law, namely what is the cause of an effect. Often in the event of a traffic accident the focus in solving is only on the facts of the incident but the presence of causality becomes a filter to see which is the cause of the effect.

Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and discuss the application of causality to traffic accidents that result in death.

Methods of the Research: This research is a normative legal research. In this study, the approach used is the legal approach. Sources of data obtained are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is by means of library research by collecting materials through invitations, reference books, mass media, such as newspapers. The overall data in this study were analyzed qualitatively.

Results of the Research : The results of this study indicate that the application of the teaching of causality to traffic accidents resulting in death has its own problems where law enforcers, both the police, prosecutors and judges, always use the theory/doctrine of causality because the causality teaching has not been clearly defined, so the application that is present only one or two doctrines from the teachings of causality, be it the theory of conditio sine quo non, generalizing, individualizing, to relevance. Therefore it is very important to provide technical guidelines for judges and prosecutors in interpreting, exploring, analyzing, and applying the teachings of causality so that the process of finding causes that cause prohibited effects produces a truth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics

References

Ahmad Sofian, Ajaran Kausalitas Hukum Pidana, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta, 2018.

Al-Mahdi, dkk. “Perdamaian Dalam Tindak Pidana Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Syiah Kuala, Volume 1, No. 4, November 2013.

Andi Hamzah, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rinek Cipata, Jakarta, 2010.

Andi Sofyan dan Nur Aziza, Buku Ajar Hukum Pidana, Makassar, Pustaka Pena Press, 2016.

Arief, Barda Nawawi, Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan (Perspektif Pembaharuan Dan Perbandingan Hukum Pidana). Pustaka Magister, Semarang, 2011.

Asep Supriadi, Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Alumni, Bandung, 2014.

Jan Remmelink, Hukum Pidana Komentaratas Pasal-Pasal Terpenting dari Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padanannya dalam KitabUndang-Undang Pidana Indonesia, Gramedia Pustaka, Jakarta, 2003.

Jan Remmelink, Hukum Pidana, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2003.

Juanrico A. S. Titahelu, 2020, Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Terhadap Anak Dibidang Lalu Lintas, Jurnal Masohi, Volume 01, No 01.

M Syarifudin Abadillah, 2020, ”Penerapan Asas Kausalitas Dalam Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Yang Menyebabkan Korban Meninggal Dunia”, Jurnal Kertha Semaya Vol 8,Nomor 5.

Muhhamad Mu’iz Raharjo, Pokok-Pokok dan Sistem Pemerintahan Desa, Jakarta, 2021.

Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2009.

Roeslan Saleh, Masih Saja Tentang Kesalahan, Karya Dunia Fikri, Bandung, 1994.

Teguh Prasetyo, Hukum Pidana, Raja Grafindo Persada, Depok, 2010.