The Effectiveness of The Coaching Program in State Prisons in Improving the Skills and Behavior of Inmates and Its Impact on Recidivism Rates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v6i4.3878Keywords:
Coaching Program Effectiveness, Inmate Skills and Behavior, RecidivismAbstract
Introduction: Recidivism remains a critical challenge in Indonesia's criminal justice system, particularly in correctional institutions like the Class IIB Ruteng Detention Center (Rutan).
Purposes of the Research: This study analyzes the effectiveness of coaching programs in enhancing inmates' skills and behavior, and their impact on recidivism rates.
Methods of the Research: Using an empirical juridical approach, primary data were collected through interviews with 20 inmates, 6 staff members, and observations at Rutan Ruteng, supplemented by secondary data from regulations and reports.
Findings of the Research: Findings reveal that while personality and independence coaching programs (e.g., religious awareness, vocational training in woodworking and farming) show moderate effectiveness in skill improvement (70% participation rate), behavioral changes are inconsistent due to limited resources and external stigma. Recidivism averaged 3 inmates annually (2021-2024), primarily theft cases, indicating partial program impact. The study recommends enhanced funding, community partnerships, and post-release support to reduce recidivism below national averages (3.55% in 2023). This research contributes to correctional policy reform aligned with Law No. 22/2022 on Correctional System.
Downloads
References
Abdullah Nasik Ulwan, Efektifitas Pembinaan Narapidana Residivis Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIA Yogyakarta (Study Kasus 2010-2015), Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2017.
Ahmad Arif, Pemenjaraan, Antara Memulihkan atau Menciptakan Residivis, Kementrian Imigrasi dan Pemasyarakatan Republik Indonesia Direktorat Jendral Pemasyarakatan.
A Ilham, M & Rahman, Praktik Penyelenggaraan Ketenteraman Dan Ketertiban Umum, AMU Press, 2024.
Kornelius Benuf et al., “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer,” Jurnal Gema Keadilan 7, no. 1 (2020): 20–33.
Lawrence M. Friedman, The Legal System Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2009.
Fahrija Fajarianoor et al., “Efektivitas Pembinaan Narapidana Berbasis Pondok Pesantren Pada Lembaga Pembinaan Keagamaan Pondok Pesantren Terpadu At Taubah (Lpk Ppta) Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) Kelas Iib Amuntai Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara,” Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia 2, no. 1 (2025): 470–83.
Dwidja Priyanto, Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara Di Indonesia, Cet. Ke-2 (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2009).
M. Zaidan, M. A & Sh, Kebijakan Kriminal, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.
Maulana, A. Bentuk Pembinaan Terhadap Residivis Dalam Upaya Mencegah Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Klas I Medan, ari Https://Eprints.Pancabudi.Ac.Id/Id/Eprint/1553/1/Arifuddin%20maulana.Pdf
Safaruddin Harefa, “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Di Indonesia Melaui Hukum Pidana Positif Dan Hukum Pidana Islam,” University Of Bengkulu Law Journal 4, no. 1 (2019): 35–58.
Sri Yunarti Indra, Elimartati, “Efektivitas Bimbingan Kemandirian Untuk Mewujudkan Ketahanan Ekonomi Bagi Klien Pemasyarakatan Bapas Bukittinggi,” Restorative: Journal of Indonesian Probation and Parole System 2, no. 1 (2024): 33–45
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Antonius Axl Alot Ndalo, Bhisa Vitus Wilhelmus, Heryanto Amalo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
