Rethinking Overcriminalization in Indonesia: Proportionality, Ultimum Remedium, and the Limits of Criminal Law

Yohanes Leonardus Ngompat; Rosalia Martha Jawa Kelen; Kayla Cahyani; Veronika Katarina Gelalek Werang; Richardus Wesly Teka

doi:10.47268/tatohi.v6i7.4068

Authors

Yohanes Leonardus Ngompat Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira , Indonesia
Rosalia Martha Jawa Kelen ✉ Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira , Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0425-3378
Kayla Cahyani Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira , Indonesia
Veronika Katarina Gelalek Werang Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira , Indonesia
Richardus Wesly Teka Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v6i7.4068

Keywords:

Overcriminalization, Criminalization Policy, Proportionality, Ultimum Remedium, Administrative Penal Law

Abstract

Introduction: The expansion of criminal sanctions into administrative violations and private conduct raises concerns about the proper limits of criminal law in Indonesia. The central issue is how to distinguish legitimate criminalization from overcriminalization while protecting public interests and individual rights.

Purposes of the Research: This study examines the forms of overcriminalization in Indonesian criminal law, evaluates their compatibility with proportionality and the ultimum remedium principle, and identifies normative directions for criminalization reform.

Methods of the Research: This study employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials, including relevant criminal provisions, are examined alongside secondary legal scholarship. Qualitative legal analysis is used to assess the legitimacy, necessity, and proportionality of criminal sanctions.

Findings of the Research: The analysis identifies three areas requiring critical scrutiny: criminal sanctions attached to administrative violations, criminal provisions affecting civil liberties, and criminalization of conduct within the private sphere. The article also discusses prison overcrowding and criminal justice system burdens as potential consequences of excessive penal intervention. However, the causal contribution of overcriminalization requires further assessment against other structural factors. A proportionate criminalization policy should consider the seriousness of harm, the necessity of penal intervention, the availability of less restrictive alternatives, and the relationship between the offense and the severity of sanctions. Conclusion: Criminalization reform in Indonesia should adopt a structured normative assessment grounded in legality, proportionality, necessity, and ultimum remedium. This framework can help legislators distinguish conduct requiring penal intervention from conduct more appropriately addressed through administrative, civil, or restorative mechanisms.

References

Aji, Atqo Darmawan. “Analisis Yuridis Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Administrasi Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Perspektif Critical Legal Studies.” Lex Renaissance 9, no. 1 (2024).

Ali, Mahrus. “Overcriminalization Dalam Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” JH Ius Quia Iustum 25, no. 3 (2019): 450–71. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss3.art2.

Artayasa, I Nyoman. “Kedudukan Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Ilmu Hukum I.” Jurnal Cakrawarti 02, no. 01 (2019): 30–36.

Cahyani, Regyta, Regita Merlandri, and Vinda Milsyi Almeira. “Pengaruh Efektifitas Penyidikan Oleh Penyidik Terhadap Kecepatan Penyelesaian Perkara Dipengadilan Pidana.” Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik 3, no. 1 (2025): 214–24.

Kenedi, John. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy) Dalam Sistem Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. YOgyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.

Mukhtar, Gusti Randhy. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Body Shaming Di Media Sosial.” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2023.

Prawira, M. Rizki Yudha. “Potensi Overkriminalisasi Pada Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Kohabitasi Dalam Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Pidana: Perspektif Fair Trial.” Jurnal Huku Statuta 4, no. 1 (2024): 31–49.

Setiawan, Deni, Awan Maulidin Juna, M Surya Fadillah, Sabdia Oktarianda, Zulkarnen, Agus Rizal, and Ibnu Satrio. “Prinsip Proporsionalitas Dalam Penerapan Hukuman Pidana Di Indonesia.” JIMMI: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin 1, no. 3 (2024): 266–78.

Sirait, Adi Syahputra. “Overcriminalization Dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 1975.” Jurnal Al-Maqasid 6, no. 2 (2020): 169–81.

Wiratama, Aditya Wahyu. “Kebijakan Kriminalisasi Pelanggaran Administratif Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan,” 2018.

Yofarrel, Mohammad. “Kriminalisasi Berlebihan (Overcriminalization) Sebagai Faktor Struktural Overcrowding Lapas Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” UNES Law Review 8, no. 1 (September 2025): 151–62. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v8i1.2504.