Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Persimpangan: Menelusuri Upaya Pelemahan Dan Dampaknya Bagi Hukum Dan Demokrasi

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, Indonesia

Abstract
Introduction: This article discusses the position of the Constitutional Court (MK) in Indonesia in the context of the attempts to weaken it and its impact on law and democracy.
Purposes of the Research: This research identifies several factors that contribute to the Constitutional Court's challenges, such as political interference, corruption, and legislation that harms the institution's independence
Methods of the Research: Using literature methods, this research analyzes various secondary sources, including books, academic articles, and official reports relating to constitutional and judicial issues
Results of the Research: Weakening of the Constitutional Court (MK) can be divided into two categories: external and internal. External factors include the lack of strengthening authority in the Constitutional Court Law, political efforts in appointing judges, and the removal of judges by the DPR without legal basis. Meanwhile, internal factors come from ethical violations of judges affiliated with politics and inconsistencies in decisions. Strengthening the Constitutional Court institution is needed through a transparent judge selection process and supervision from the Judicial Commission, concluding that efforts to strengthen the Constitutional Court are very important in maintaining justice and democracy in Indonesia. Recommendations are proposed to increase the independence and accountability of the Constitutional Court, including the need for structural reform and strengthening supervisory mechanisms. Thus, this research contributes to understanding the importance of the role of the Constitutional Court in a healthy legal system and democracy.Keywords
DOI
10.47268/pamali.v4i3.2371
Published
2024-11-29
How To Cite
@article{pamali2371, author = {Hilda Salsabil}, title = {Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Persimpangan: Menelusuri Upaya Pelemahan Dan Dampaknya Bagi Hukum Dan Demokrasi}, journal = {PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review}, volume = {4}, number = {3}, year = {2024}, keywords = {Constitutional Court; Weakening; Law; and Democracy.}, abstract = {Introduction: This article discusses the position of the Constitutional Court (MK) in Indonesia in the context of the attempts to weaken it and its impact on law and democracy.Purposes of the Research: This research identifies several factors that contribute to the Constitutional Court's challenges, such as political interference, corruption, and legislation that harms the institution's independenceMethods of the Research: Using literature methods, this research analyzes various secondary sources, including books, academic articles, and official reports relating to constitutional and judicial issuesResults of the Research: Weakening of the Constitutional Court (MK) can be divided into two categories: external and internal. External factors include the lack of strengthening authority in the Constitutional Court Law, political efforts in appointing judges, and the removal of judges by the DPR without legal basis. Meanwhile, internal factors come from ethical violations of judges affiliated with politics and inconsistencies in decisions. Strengthening the Constitutional Court institution is needed through a transparent judge selection process and supervision from the Judicial Commission, concluding that efforts to strengthen the Constitutional Court are very important in maintaining justice and democracy in Indonesia. Recommendations are proposed to increase the independence and accountability of the Constitutional Court, including the need for structural reform and strengthening supervisory mechanisms. Thus, this research contributes to understanding the importance of the role of the Constitutional Court in a healthy legal system and democracy.}, issn = {2775-5649}, pages = {419--435} doi = {10.47268/pamali.v4i3.2371}, url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/pamali/article/view/2371} }
Artikel Jurnal
Amnan, Durohim, ‘LegalitaS PemeCatan HaKim ASWanto Di Tengah MaSa Jabatan Oleh DeWan PerWaKilan RaKYat’, Jatiswara, 38.1 (2023).
Azis, Fuad Abdul, and Irham Ramur, ‘Analisis Kewenangan Dpr Terhadap Polemik Penggantian Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi’, Lisyabab : Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 4.1 (2023), pp. 71–83, doi:10.58326/jurnallisyabab.v4i1.153.
Indramayu, Indramayu, Jayus Jayus, and Rosita Indrayati, ‘Rekonseptualisasi Seleksi Hakim Konstitusi Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Hakim Konstitusi Yang Berkualifikasi’, E-Journal Lentera Hukum, 4.1 (2017), p. 1, doi:10.19184/ejlh.v4i1.5267.
Isra, Saldi, ‘Titik Singgung Wewenang Mahkamah Agung’, Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 4.1 (2015), pp. 17–30.
Satriawan, Iwan, and Tanto Lailam, ‘Implication of Selection Mechanism Towards Integrity and Independency of Constitutional Court Judges in Indonesia’, Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9.1 (2021), pp. 112–38, doi:10.29303/ius.v9i1.871.
Subandri, Rio, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Persyaratan Batas Usia Pencalonan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden’, 2.1 (2024), pp. 135–53, doi:10.51903/jaksa.v2i1.1512.
Syandhira Suzeeta, Nala, and Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba, ‘Pelanggaran Kode Etik Oleh Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/Puu-Xxi/2023’, Pelanggaran Kode Etik (Suzeeta, Dkk.) Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1.11 (2023), pp. 255–62, doi:10.5281/zenodo.10252190.
Topane, Gayus Lumbun, ‘Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Oleh Dpr Ri’, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 6.3 (2009).
Viktoris Dahoklory, Madaskolay, ‘Menilik Arah Politik Perubahan Undang-Undang MK’, Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 50.2 (2011), pp. 222–31.
Wahyu Aji Ramadan, Irma Aulia Pertiwi Nusantara, Tanti Mitasari, ‘Reformulasi Pengawasan Mahkamah Konstitusi’, Jurnal Studia Legalia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3.2 (2022), pp. 21–43.
Wicaksono, Agung Tri, Achmad Arby Nur, Sayidatul Mar’ah, and Ernawati Huroiroh, ‘Praktik Inkonstitusional Pemberhentian Hakim Konstitusi Pada Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia’, Verfassung: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 2.1 (2023), pp. 1–24, doi:10.30762/vjhtn.v2i1.217.
Buku
Mahfud, Moh, Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945 (2008)
———, Rambu Pembatas Dan Perluasan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi (2009)
Gani, A. (2020). Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia: Tantangan dan Peluang. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
Mahfud, M. D. (2021). Konstitusi dan Keadilan: Menjaga Integritas Lembaga Peradilan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Gadjah Mada.
Tanjung, R. (2019). Dinamika Hukum dan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Alumni.
Sudrajat, H. (2022). Peradilan Konstitusi dan Tantangan Modernitas. Bandung: Penerbit Rosda.
Skripsi, Tesis, Distertasi, Online/World Wide Web dan Lain-Lain
Ardhi, Satria, ‘Pandangan Pakar UGM Terkait Putusan MK Soal Batas Usia Capres-Cawapres’, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2023 (https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/pandangan-pakar-ugm-terkait-putusan-mk-soal-batas-usia-capres-cawapres/)
Badan Pengembangan Dan Pembinaan Bahasa, ‘KBBI’, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 2016) https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/pelemahan
‘Indeks Demokrasi Turun, Kebebasan Pers Turut Terancam’, Kompas.Id, 2024 (https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2024/01/31/indeks-demokrasi-turun-kebebasan-pers-turut-terancam)
Ketua Komisi Ii Dpr Dorong Perkuat Mk, Singgung Amandemen Konstitusi’, Detik News, 2024 <https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7533707/ketua-komisi-ii-dpr-dorong-perkuat-mk-singgung-amandemen-konstitusi>
Madrim, Sasmito, ‘LSI: Mayoritas Warga Nilai Putusan MK Soal Usia Capres-Cawapres Tidak Adil’, VOA Indonesia, 2023 (https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/lsi-mayoritas-warga-nilai-putusan-mk-soal-usia-capres-cawapres-tidak-adil/7322100.html)
‘Otokratisasi Adalah Suatu Proses Perubahan Sistem Politik Yang Semula Demokrasi Perlahan Bergerak Menuju Otokrasi’
‘RUU Pilkada Yang Anulir Putusan MK Akan Disahkan Besok Dalam Rapat Paripurna Artikel Ini Telah Tayang Di Kompas.Com Dengan Judul “RUU Pilkada Yang Anulir Putusan MK Akan Disahkan Besok Dalam Rapat Paripurna”, Klik Untuk Baca: Https://Nasional.Kompas.Com/R’, Kompas, 2024 <https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/08/21/19054751/ruu-pilkada-yang-anulir-putusan-mk-akan-disahkan-besok-dalam-rapat-paripurna>Dublin Core | PKP Metadata Items | Metadata for this Document | |
1. | Title | Title of document | Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Persimpangan: Menelusuri Upaya Pelemahan Dan Dampaknya Bagi Hukum Dan Demokrasi |
2. | Creator | Author's name, affiliation, country | Hilda Halnum Salsabil; Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto; Indonesia |
3. | Subject | Discipline(s) | |
3. | Subject | Keyword(s) | Constitutional Court; Weakening; Law; and Democracy. |
4. | Description | Abstract | Introduction: This article discusses the position of the Constitutional Court (MK) in Indonesia in the context of the attempts to weaken it and its impact on law and democracy.Purposes of the Research: This research identifies several factors that contribute to the Constitutional Court's challenges, such as political interference, corruption, and legislation that harms the institution's independenceMethods of the Research: Using literature methods, this research analyzes various secondary sources, including books, academic articles, and official reports relating to constitutional and judicial issuesResults of the Research: Weakening of the Constitutional Court (MK) can be divided into two categories: external and internal. External factors include the lack of strengthening authority in the Constitutional Court Law, political efforts in appointing judges, and the removal of judges by the DPR without legal basis. Meanwhile, internal factors come from ethical violations of judges affiliated with politics and inconsistencies in decisions. Strengthening the Constitutional Court institution is needed through a transparent judge selection process and supervision from the Judicial Commission, concluding that efforts to strengthen the Constitutional Court are very important in maintaining justice and democracy in Indonesia. Recommendations are proposed to increase the independence and accountability of the Constitutional Court, including the need for structural reform and strengthening supervisory mechanisms. Thus, this research contributes to understanding the importance of the role of the Constitutional Court in a healthy legal system and democracy. |
5. | Publisher | Organizing agency, location | Postgraduate Program in Law, Pattimura University |
6. | Contributor | Sponsor(s) | |
7. | Date | (YYYY-MM-DD) | 2024-11-29 |
8. | Type | Status & genre | Peer-reviewed Article |
8. | Type | Type | |
9. | Format | File format | |
10. | Identifier | Uniform Resource Identifier | https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/pamali/article/view/2371 |
10. | Identifier | Digital Object Identifier | 10.47268/pamali.v4i3.2371 |
11. | Source | Title; vol., no. (year) | PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review; Vol 4, No 3 (2024): NOVEMBER |
12. | Language | English=en | in |
13. | Relation | Supp. Files | |
14. | Coverage | Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) | |
15. | Rights | Copyright and permissions | Copyright: Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions: 1. The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent. 2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. 3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. 4. Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
|
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Hilda Halnum Salsabil
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0