Navigating Legal Pluralism in the Conflict Between Waqf and Customary Land in Indonesia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v32i3.3457

Keywords:

Dualism of Land Ownership, Waqf and Customary Heritage, Agrarian Disputes Based on Traditional Values

Abstract

Introduction: The dualism of land law in Indonesia (positive law, Islamic law, customary law) that causes conflicts, especially between waqf land and customary heritage land.

Purposes of the Research: Analyze the roots of conflicts, implications for legal certainty, and find integrative solutions.

Methods of the Research: The research uses a normative legal method with a descriptive-analytical approach through a literature study of laws and regulations, doctrines, and scientific literature related to agrarian law, waqf, and customary law community rights.

Results of the Research: The results of the study show that disputes generally originate from differences in the concept of land ownership, where waqf law places land as an individual right that can be waqf for religious and social purposes, while customary law views land as a communal asset that has historical, cultural, and spiritual value so that any change in status must obtain the approval of all parties who are entitled to it. This paradigm difference causes the administrative recognition of the state to not always be in line with the social legitimacy that lives in indigenous peoples, thus giving rise to legal uncertainty and prolonged conflicts. This research emphasizes the importance of harmonizing agrarian law, Islamic law, and customary law through strengthening land status verification, optimizing waqf administration, involving customary institutions in the decision-making process, and increasing coordination between agencies. This approach is expected to be able to realize legal certainty that is not only formal, but also reflects substantive justice and maintains social harmony in the settlement of land disputes in Indonesia.

References

Aasoglenang, T. A, S. Z Bonye, and G. Y Yiridomoh. “Framework for Building Synergies of the Traditional and Formal Political Adjudicatory Institutions in Conflict Resolution in North-Western Ghana.” Cogent Social Sciences 9, no. 2 (2023): 2268974. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2268974.

Abdullah, A. G. Pengantar Kompilasi Hukum Islam Dalam Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1994.

Fahri, AR, MF Ramadhan, and MA Ilham. “Ketika Kepastian Hukum Tersandung Birokrasi: Studi Implementasi Pendaftaran Tanah Di Kantor Badan Pertanahan Nasional.” Dialogika Hukum 1, no. 2 (2026): 1–17.

Fatahillah, Z. “Perlindungan Hukum Tanah Wakaf Yang Tidak Memiliki Sertifikat (Studi Terhadap Putusan Wakaf Di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Aceh).” Kalam: Jurnal Agama Dan Sosial Humaniora 7, no. 1 (2019): 1–20.

Febriansyah, E. “Peranan Persyarikatan Muhammadiyah Sebagai Nazhir Dalam Pengelolaan Tanah Wakaf Di Yogyakarta Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf (Peran Perusahaan Muhammadiyah Sebagai Nazhir (Penyelenggara Waqaf) Dalam Pengelolaan Tanah Waqaf Di Yogy,” 2008.

———. “Peranan Persyarikatan Muhammadiyah Sebagai Nazhir Dalam Pengelolaan Tanah Wakaf Di Yogyakarta Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf (The Role Of Muhammadiyah Corporation As The Nazhir (The Waqaf Organizer) In Managing Waqaf’s Land In Yog,” 2008.

Fitri, I, R Alauddin, and N Rungkel. “Transisi Hukum Peralihan Tanah Wakaf Menjadi Hak Milik Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Al-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial 10, no. 001 (2023): 416–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v10i001.3869.

Haq, B. U, I Badshah, A Rehman, S Ullah, and U Khan. “Dareemat: A Mechanism of Arbitration and Dispute Resolution among Pashtuns in Zhob, Pakistan.” Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis 55, no. 1 (2023): 97–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2023.2188016.

Harris, A, F. Y Sitepu, and S. L Andriati. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Dualisme Kepemilikan Hak Guna Bangunan Diatas Hak Pengelolaan Sebagai Aset Pemerintah Kota Medan (Sengketa Tanah Di Kecamatan Medan Petisah).” De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 2 (2021): 339–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v6i2.5965.

Kurniawan, K. F. B, A. H Dharmawan, T Sumarti, and M Maksum. “Territorialization of Plantation Concessions: Customary Land Acquisition Process, Agrarian Fragmentation and Social Resistance.” Cogent Social Sciences 10, no. 1 (2024): 2367259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2367259.

———. “Territorialization of Plantation Concessions: Customary Land Acquisition Process, Agrarian Fragmentation and Social Resistance.” Cogent Social Sciences 10, no. 1 (2024): 2367259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2367259.

Lingaas, C. “Indigenous Customary Law and Norwegian Domestic Law: Scenes of a (Complementary or Mutually Exclusive) Marriage?” Laws 11, no. 9 (2022): 19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11020019.

Malaka, Z. “Kepemilikan Tanah Dalam Konsep Hukum Positif Indoensia, Hukum Adat Dan Hukum Islam.” Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam 21, no. 1 (2018): 101–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15642/alqanun.2018.21.1.101-124.

Maran, Mary Grace Megumi. “Pengaruh Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Waris Melalui Mediasi Terhadap Hak Penguasaan Atas Tanah Di Desa Nifikiu Kecamatan Amanuban Timur Kabupaten Timor Tengah Selatan.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 6, no. 6 (2025): 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i6.1384.

Mughniyah, M. J. Fiqih Lima Mazhab: Ja’fari, Hanafi, Maliki, Syafi’i, Hambali. Jakarta: Lentera, 2002.

Oh, C. H., Shin, J, and S. S. H Ho. “Conflicts between Mining Companies and Communities: Institutional Environments and Conflict Resolution Approaches.” Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility 32, no. 2 (2023): 638–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12522.

Pratiwi, B, P. F Soeparan, and W Wibisono. “Peran Hukum Adat Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Agraria Di Indonesia: Kajian Empiris Dengan Metode Komparatif.” Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Sosial 2, no. 4 (2024): 807–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v2i4.2187.

Putri, KVG, and S Akhmaddhian. “Harmonisasi Regulasi Nasional Dalam Pengelolaan Dan Pemanfaatan Tanah Dalam Perpektif Teori Sistem Hukum.” Logika: Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Kuningan 16, no. 02 (2025): 197–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25134/logika.v16i02.3338.

Rifiyanti, S. M, M Wulandari, and A Mubarok. “Pengakuan Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Tanah Adat Di Ibu Kota Nusantara Dalam Tata Kelola Agraria.” Almufi Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora 1, no. 2 (2024): 52–59.

Saija, R, FXR Letsoin, RJ Akyuwen, and P Radjawane. “Status Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Adat Marga Dalam Kebijakan Penataan Aset Reforma Agraria Di Kabupaten Maluku Tenggara.” Sasi 26, no. 1 (2020): 99–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i1.246.

Sirait, Tpw. “Penerapan Model Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Secara Non-Litigasi Di Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo.” Jurnal Media Akademik (Jma) 4, no. 1 (2026): 2–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62281/bqd8rp84.

Umar, U, T Hadi, and A Hanafi. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Sengketa Tanah Adat Dalam Perspektif Hukum Agraria Nasional.” Catatan Hukum 1, no. 2 (2025): 53–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70716/legalnote.v1i2.107.

Wardi, U, Y Yaswirman, I Ismail, and G Gafnel. “Comparative Analysis of Islamic Family Law and Customary Law in the Settlement of Inheritance Disputes in Indonesia.” Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies 3, no. 1 (2024): 13–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57255/hakamain.v3i1.330.

Downloads

Published

Published: July 27, 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates

Article History

Received: October 6, 2025
Revised: July 11, 2026
Accepted: July 14, 2026

How to Cite

Navigating Legal Pluralism in the Conflict Between Waqf and Customary Land in Indonesia. (2026). SASI, 32(3), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v32i3.3457

Article Metrics

Abstract Views 0

Full Text Views 0
Last updated: July 26, 2026