Menelaah Keadilan dalam Kebijakan Penanggulangan Illegal Fishing Di Indonesia: Perspektif Konsep Keadilan Thomas Aquinas

Mashuril Anwar(1email), Rini Fathonah(2), Niko Alexander(3)


(1) Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
(2) Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
(3) Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
email Corresponding Author
CrossMark

Abstract


Justice is still an expensive item that is difficult to reach by every level of Indonesian society, including local fishermen who do illegal fishing. The criminal law policy in tackling illegal fishing which is represented in the Fisheries Law is not proportional and does not have a clear measure. Therefore, in the case of illegal fishing, a discourse of justice is attached. Related to the concept of justice offered by Thomas Aquinas, which emphasizes equality, justice, and the policy of tackling illegal fishing in Indonesia, it is interesting to discuss. This article aims to examine funds to analyze the concept of Thomas Aquinas 'philosophy of justice and to explore justice in the policy of tackling illegal fishing in the perspective of Thomas Aquinas' philosophy of justice. In order to answer these problems, this study uses a normative juridical method. Based on the research results, the concept of justice offered by Thomas Aquinas consists of distributive, commutative, and indicative justice. The essence of Thomas Aquinas' three concepts of justice is proportional to equality. Associated with Thomas Aquinas' concept of justice, the policy to combat illegal fishing in Indonesia has not provided justice. It is said that because the sanction for deprivation of freedom in the Fisheries Law only applies to local fishermen and has not reached foreign fishermen who do illegal fishing. In order to be fair, the sanction of deprivation of liberty should not apply to local fishermen who do illegal fishing as well as foreign fishermen.

Keywords


Justice; Illegal Fishing; Thomas Aquinas

How To Cite


APA: Anwar, M., Fathonah, R., & Alexander, N. (2021). Menelaah Keadilan dalam Kebijakan Penanggulangan Illegal Fishing Di Indonesia: Perspektif Konsep Keadilan Thomas Aquinas. SASI, 27(2), 126-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i2.357.
IEEE: M. Anwar, R. Fathonah, and N. Alexander, "Menelaah Keadilan dalam Kebijakan Penanggulangan Illegal Fishing Di Indonesia: Perspektif Konsep Keadilan Thomas Aquinas", SASI, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 126-135, Jun. 2021. Accessed on: Mar. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i2.357
Harvard: Anwar, M., Fathonah, R., and Alexander, N., (2021). "Menelaah Keadilan dalam Kebijakan Penanggulangan Illegal Fishing Di Indonesia: Perspektif Konsep Keadilan Thomas Aquinas". SASI, Volume 27(2), pp. 126-135. [Online]. Available DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i2.357 (Accessed on: 29 March 2024)
Chicago: Anwar, Mashuril, Rini Fathonah, and Niko Alexander. "Menelaah Keadilan dalam Kebijakan Penanggulangan Illegal Fishing Di Indonesia: Perspektif Konsep Keadilan Thomas Aquinas." SASI 27, no. 2 (June 4, 2021): 126-135. Accessed March 29, 2024. doi:10.47268/sasi.v27i2.357
Vancouver: Anwar M, Fathonah R, Alexander N. Menelaah Keadilan dalam Kebijakan Penanggulangan Illegal Fishing Di Indonesia: Perspektif Konsep Keadilan Thomas Aquinas. SASI [Internet]. 2021 Jun 4 [cited 2024 Mar 29];27(2):126-135. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i2.357
MLA 8th: Anwar, Mashuril, Rini Fathonah, and Niko Alexander. "Menelaah Keadilan dalam Kebijakan Penanggulangan Illegal Fishing Di Indonesia: Perspektif Konsep Keadilan Thomas Aquinas." SASI, vol. 27, no. 2, 4 Jun. 2021, pp. 126-135, doi:10.47268/sasi.v27i2.357. Accessed 29 Mar. 2024.
BibTeX:
@article{SASI357,
		author = {Mashuril Anwar and Rini Fathonah and Niko Alexander},
		title = {Menelaah Keadilan dalam Kebijakan Penanggulangan Illegal Fishing Di Indonesia: Perspektif Konsep Keadilan Thomas Aquinas},
		journal = {SASI},
		volume = {27},
		number = {2},
		year = {2021},
		keywords = {Justice;  Illegal Fishing; Thomas Aquinas},
		abstract = {Justice is still an expensive item that is difficult to reach by every level of Indonesian society, including local fishermen who do illegal fishing. The criminal law policy in tackling illegal fishing which is represented in the Fisheries Law is not proportional and does not have a clear measure. Therefore, in the case of illegal fishing, a discourse of justice is attached. Related to the concept of justice offered by Thomas Aquinas, which emphasizes equality, justice, and the policy of tackling illegal fishing in Indonesia, it is interesting to discuss. This article aims to examine funds to analyze the concept of Thomas Aquinas 'philosophy of justice and to explore justice in the policy of tackling illegal fishing in the perspective of Thomas Aquinas' philosophy of justice. In order to answer these problems, this study uses a normative juridical method. Based on the research results, the concept of justice offered by Thomas Aquinas consists of distributive, commutative, and indicative justice. The essence of Thomas Aquinas' three concepts of justice is proportional to equality. Associated with Thomas Aquinas' concept of justice, the policy to combat illegal fishing in Indonesia has not provided justice. It is said that because the sanction for deprivation of freedom in the Fisheries Law only applies to local fishermen and has not reached foreign fishermen who do illegal fishing. In order to be fair, the sanction of deprivation of liberty should not apply to local fishermen who do illegal fishing as well as foreign fishermen.},
				issn = {2614-2961},		pages = {126--135}			doi = {10.47268/sasi.v27i2.357},
				url = {https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/357}
		}
		
RefWorks:

Citation format: 


Jurnal

[1] Adlhiyati, Z., & Achmad, A. (2019). Melacak Keadilan dalam Regulasi Poligami: Kajian Filsafat Keadilan Aristoteles, Thomas Aquinas, dan John Rawls. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 409-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.409-431, h. 412.
https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.409-431

[2] Amin, M. (2014). Konsep Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Islam. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam, 4(02), 322-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2014.4.02.322-343.
https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2014.4.02.322-343

[3] Arum, G. A. (2019). Konsep Keadilan (Iustitia) Perspektif St. Thomas Aquinas dan Relevansinya Bagi Pemaknaan Sila V Pancasila. Lumen Veritatis: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi, 10(1), 23-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30822/lumenveritatis.v10i1.207.
https://doi.org/10.30822/lumenveritatis.v10i1.207

[4] Dwisvimiar, I. (2011). Keadilan dalam perspektif filsafat ilmu hukum. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(3), 522-531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.3.179.
https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.3.179

[5] Harahap, D. R. S. (2020). Kebijakan Formulasi Tindak Pidana Oleh Anak Yang Dapat Diupayakan Diversi Berdasarkan Aspek Keadilan Dan Tujuan Pemidanaan. Ilmu dan Budaya, 41(67).

[6] Harnoko, A. Y., & Ratnawati, I. Y. (2015). Asas Proporsional dalam Perjanjian Waralaba (Franchise). Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 1(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.33121/hukumbisnis.v1i1.54.

[7] Helmi, M. (2015). Konsep Keadilan Dalam Filsafat Hukum Dan Filsafat Hukum Islam. Mazahib, 14(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/mj/v14i2.342.

[8] Mashuri, M. (2017). Teori Keadilan Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kepala Desa Dalam Melaksanakan Kebijakan Desa (Studi Kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor 66/Pid. Sus/Tpk/2015/PN. Sby). MIMBAR YUSTITIA, 1(1), 59-78.

[9] Nasution, B. J. (2014). Kajian Filosofis tentang Konsep Keadilan dari Pemikiran Klasik sampai Pemikiran Modern. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 3(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11106.
https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11106

[10] Nasution, B. J. (2016). Kajian Filosofis tentang Hukum dan Keadilan dari Pemikiran Klasik Sampai Pemikiran Modern. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 11(2), 247-274. DOI: 10.19105/al-ihkam.v11i2.936, h. 253.
https://doi.org/10.19105/al-ihkam.v11i2.936

[11] Pratasis, S. O. (2014). Implementasi Teori Keadilan Komutatif Terhadap Pelaku Pemerkosaan Menurut Pasal 285 KUHP. LEX ET SOCIETATIS, 2(5).

[12] Putra, S. D. E. (2016). Bingkai Keadilan Hukum Pancasila Dalam Perspektif Hukum Dan Relevansinya Dengan Keadilan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 27(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jppkn.v27i1.5515.

[13] Ramon, T. (2019). Kriteria Keseimbangan Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Komutatif. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 26(2), 372-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art8.
https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art8

[14] Siregar, C. (2014). Pancasila, Keadilan Sosial, dan Persatuan Indonesia. Humaniora, 5(1), 107-112.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v5i1.2988.
https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v5i1.2988

[15] Srisusilawati, P., & Eprianti, N. (2017). Penerapan prinsip keadilan dalam akad mudharabah di lembaga keuangan syariah. Law and Justice, 2(1), 12-23.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v2i1.4333.
https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v2i1.4333

[16] Suhardin, Y. (2009). Fenomena Mengabaikan Keadilan dalam Penegakan Hukum. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 21(2), 341-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16261.

[17] Surajiyo, S. (2018). Keadilan Dalam Sistem Hukum Pancasila. IKRA-ITH HUMANIORA: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(3), 21-29.
https://doi.org/10.30601/humaniora.v2i1.51

[18] Suryawati, I. G. A. A., & Santhiarsa, I. G. N. N. (2020). Literasi Budaya Bali: Kajian Filsafat Ilmu Tentang Keadilan Dalam Sistem Subak. Jurnal Nomosleca, 6(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/nomosleca.v6i1.3960.
https://doi.org/10.26905/nomosleca.v6i1.3960

[19] Sutiyoso, B. (2010). Mencari Format Ideal Keadilan Putusan dalam Peradilan. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 17(2), 217-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss2.art5.
https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss2.art5

[20] Vieru, S. (2010). Aristotle's Influence on the Natural Law Theory of St Thomas Aquinas. The Western Australian Jurist, 1, 115-122.

[21] Wantu, F. M. (2013). Kendala Hakim Dalam Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, dan Kemanfaatan di Peradilan Perdata. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 25(2), 205-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16092, h 208.

Buku

[22] Arifin, M. (1993). Teori dan Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

[23] Bushlack, T. J. (2011). Justice in the theology of Thomas Aquinas: Rediscovering civic virtue. University of Notre Dame.

[24] Erwin, M. (2016). Filsafat Hukum Refleksi Kritis terhadap Hukum Indonesia (dalam Dimensi Ide dan Aplikasi). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

[25] Hernoko, A. Y. (2009). Perkembangan dan Dinamika Hukum Perdata Indonesia-Dalam Rangka Peringatan Ulang Tahun Ke-80 Prof. Dr. Mr. R. Soetojo Prawirihamidjojo, SH, Lutfansah Mediatama. Prof. Dr. Mr. R. Soetojo Prawirihamidjojo, SH, Surabaya: Lutfansah Mediatama.

[26] Indrati, Maria Farida S. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Proses Dan Teknik Pembentukannya, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

[27] Lisska, A. J. (2015). The Philosophy of Law of Thomas Aquinas. In A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence (pp. 285-310). Dordrecht: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9885-3_12

[28] Mertokusumo, S. (2010). Mengenal Hukum; Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

[29] Rahardjo, S. (2003). Sisi-sisi lain dari Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.

[30] Sumaryono, E., & Sardi, M. (2002). Etika & hukum: relevansi teori hukum kodrat Thomas Aquinas. Jakarta: Kanisius.

[31] Sunatri, T. (2017). Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Pidana Denda Dikaitkan Pasal 102 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 tahun 2004 Tentang Perikanan. Jakarta: MISWAR.

Lain-Lain

[32] Laliliyah, A dkk. (2016). Laporan Akhir Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum dalam Rangka Pemberantasan Kegiatan Perikanan Liar (IUU Fishing). Jakarta: Pusat Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum Nasional Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI, h. 40.

[33] Putra, A. P. (2015). Tanggung Jawab PT. PLN Terhadap Konsumen Akibat Pemadaman Listrik Ditinjau Dari UU No 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (Disertasi, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta)

[34] Tim Penyusun. (2013). Naskah Akademik Hukum Kontrak. Jakarta: BPHN Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI.

Full Text: PDF XML

Article Metrics

Abstract View grafik : 3320 times
PDF icon PDF Download : 3174 times XML icon PDF Download : 62698 times

 

Cited-By:

 

1. Tanggung Jawab Prinsipal Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Perjanjian Keagenan Dan Distributor
Sudjana Sudjana
Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum  vol: 6  issue: 1  first page: 1  year: 2022  
Type: Journal [View Source]



DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v27i2.357

Copyright (c) 2021 Mashuril Anwar, Rini Fathonah, Niko Alexander

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

Cited-By:

 

1. Tanggung Jawab Prinsipal Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Perjanjian Keagenan Dan Distributor
Sudjana Sudjana
Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum  vol: 6  issue: 1  first page: 1  year: 2022  
Type: Journal [View Source]