Reconstructing Justice in Land Acquisition for Public Interest in Indonesia from the Perspectives of Legal Pluralism Werner Menski

Authors

  • Muslimah Hayati Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sultan Adam, Indonesia
  • Fajrian Noor Anugrah Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sultan Adam, Indonesia
  • Dri Setiawan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sultan Adam, Indonesia
  • Arief Budiono univerˈsitas muhamaˈdijah suraˈkarta   image/svg+xml , Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5284-5684
  • Turdialiev Mukhammad Ali Polatjon Ogli Tashkent State University of Law   image/svg+xml , Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v32i2.3599
Check for updates

Keywords:

Land Acquisition, Public Interest, Legal Pluralism

Abstract

Introduction: This article examines the recurring gap between the normative principle of justice in land acquisition regulations for public interest development and the reality of its implementation in Indonesia. This study highlights recurring conflicts, weak community participation, and socio-cultural tensions that arise in state-driven development projects.

Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze issues of justice in land acquisition for public purposes and reconstruct a more balanced model of justice using Werner Menski's legal pluralism, which integrates state law, social norms, and moral-ethical values.

Methods of the Research: This study employs normative legal research, adopting a legislative, conceptual, and philosophical approach. Analysis was conducted on the regulatory framework, land acquisition principles, and the application of Menski's triangular legal pluralism model to assess the gap between norms and field practices.

Results of the Research: Findings reveal that the dominance of state-centered legal positivism in land acquisition often neglects socio-cultural values and moral dimensions of justice, resulting in social conflict, marginalization, and inequality. As its principal novelty, this study reconstructs the concept of justice in land acquisition through a pluralistic, participatory, and contextual model. This model integrates state law, living law, and ethical considerations, promotes meaningful community participation in decision-making processes, and adapts legal implementation to local socio-cultural realities. In doing so, it seeks to balance legal certainty, social legitimacy, and substantive justice in the governance of land acquisition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics

References

Bakker, Laurens. “Custom and Violence in Indonesia’s Protracted Land Conflict.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open 8, no. 1 (2023): 100624.

Bola, Mustafa. “Legal Standing of Customary Land in Indonesia: A Comparative Study of Land Administration Systems.” Hasanuddin Law Review 3, no. 2 (2017): 175–90.

Dhiaulhaq, Ahmad, and John F McCarthy. “Indigenous Rights and Agrarian Justice Framings in Forest Land Conflicts in Indonesia.” The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 21, no. 1 (2020): 34–54.

Djunaidy, Afieq Mufty, Sri Damayanti, and Ricky Ridwan Firmansyah. “Perspective of Legal Culture and Legal Pluralism in the Ahmadiyah Group in Indonesia.” Social Impact Journal 3, no. 2 (2024): 70–77.

Grabowski, Andrzej. “Juristic Concept of the Validity of Statutory Law.” A Critique of Contemporary Legal Nonpositivism, Heidelberg–New York–Dordrecht–London, 2013.

Hariri, Achmad, Satria Unggul Wicaksana, and Samsul Arifin. “A Critical Study of Legal Positivism As a Legal System in a Pluralist Country.” KnE Social Sciences, 2022, 563–72.

Hartono, Mimin Dwi, Hari Reswanto, Delsy Nike, Nadia Farikhati, Azis Pratama, Utari Putri Wardanti, and Hajmudin Hekmatiar. “Dampak Proyek Strategis Nasional Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia,” 2024.

Holtslag-Broekhof, S M, Ramona Van Marwijk, R Beunen, and J S C Wiskerke. “Perceived (in) Justice of Public Land Acquisition.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29, no. 2 (2016): 167–84.

Kombe, Wilbard J. “Land Acquisition for Public Use, Emerging Conflicts and Their Socio-Political Implications.” International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development 2, no. 1–2 (2010): 45–63.

Kurniawan, Joeni Arianto. “Contested Land, Contesting Laws. A Context of Legal Pluralism and Industrialization in Indonesia.” Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies 6, no. 2 (2014): 93–106.

Leopold, Aldo. “The Land Ethic.” In The Ethics of the Environment, 99–113. Routledge, 2017.

Maria, Marcello De, Elizabeth J Z Robinson, and Giacomo Zanello. “Fair Compensation in Large-Scale Land Acquisitions: Fair or Fail?” World Development 170 (2023): 106338.

Menski, Werner. Perbandingan Hukum Dalam Konteks Global: Sistem Eropa, Asia Dan Afrika. Nusamedia, 2019.

———. “Remembering and Applying Legal Pluralism: Law as Kite Flying.” In Concepts of Law, 91–108. Routledge, 2016.

Moreda, Tsegaye. “Large-Scale Land Acquisitions, State Authority and Indigenous Local Communities: Insights from Ethiopia.” Third World Quarterly 38, no. 3 (2017): 698–716.

Nisa, Ayu Chairun, and Arini Asriyani. “Dinamika Agraria Nasional Dan Sengketa Tanah Adat Dalam Perspektif Hukum Kontemporer.” Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Amsir 3, no. 2 (2025): 173–80.

Pilarczyk, Ian C, Angela Fernandez, and Brian Young. Law, Life, and the Teaching of Legal History: Essays in Honour of G. Blaine Baker. McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP, 2022.

Rohmat, Noor. “Reconstruction of Land Procurement Policies and Land Losses Compensation in the Name of Public Interests Based on Justice Value.” Sch Int J Law Crime Justice 4, no. 2 (2021): 47–53.

Sahnan, Sahnan, M Yazid Fathoni, and Musakir Salat. “Penerapan Prinsip Keadilan Dalam Pembebasan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 3, no. 3 (2015).

Sani, Hanisah Binte Abdullah. “State Law and Legal Pluralism: Towards an Appraisal.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 52, no. 1 (2020): 82–109.

Setiabudhi, Donna Okhtalia. “The Problematic of Small-Scale Land Acquisition (Less than 5 Hectares) for Public Interest Development.” Hasanuddin Law Review 1, no. 1 (2016): 61–74.

Simarmata, Rikardo. “The States Position Regarding Registration of Customary Land (Orientasi Negara Dalam Pendaftaran Tanah Adat Di Indonesia).” The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies 1, no. 1 (2021): 3.

Swenson, Geoffrey. “Legal Pluralism in Theory and Practice.” International Studies Review 20, no. 3 (2018): 438–62.

Swyngedouw, Erik, and Callum Ward. “Land as an Asset.” In The Political Economy of Land, 40–55. Routledge, 2022.

Tejomurti, Kukuh, Denie Amiruddin, Andi Sasongko, and Imam Sukadi. “Pergulatan Mazhab Hukum Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Milik Masyarakat Adat Untuk Kepentingan Umum.” Warkat 2 (2022): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21776/warkat.v2n1.1.

Trenggana, Widaningsih, and Silvy Vebritha. “Peran Pemerintah Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Infrastruktur Publik: Studi Mekanisme Dan Kebijakan.” Jurnal Publik 18, no. 02 (2024): 142–56.

Wahanisa, Rofi, Arif Hidayat, R Benny Riyanto, and Bayu Dwi Anggono. “Problems of Disputes/Conflicts over Land Acquisition towards Development for Public Interest in Indonesia.” International Journal 10 (2021): 321.

Wirda, Putri Raihan, Rahmad Efendy Al Amin Siregar, and Azka Amalia Jihad. “Criminal Evidence Auction System At The Aceh Besar District Prosecutor’s Office Based On Islamic Law’s Perspective.” Jurista: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan 9, no. 2 (2025): 404–25.

Wolski, B. “Mediators and Substantive Justice: A Sociocultural Perspective.” In Law and Society Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference 2017: A Meeting Place for Interdisciplinary Explorations of Justice, 2017.

Yulizar, Yakub. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum Di Sumatera Barat.” Universitas Andalas, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Reconstructing Justice in Land Acquisition for Public Interest in Indonesia from the Perspectives of Legal Pluralism Werner Menski. (2026). SASI, 32(2), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v32i2.3599