Reconstructing Legality in a Plural Legal System: Living Law and Customary Criminal Law Under Indonesia’s New Criminal Code

Lisa Aminatul Mukaromah; Khurul Anam; Imroatul Azizah

doi:10.47268/sasi.v32i4.3890

Authors

Lisa Aminatul Mukaromah ✉ Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri , Indonesia
Khurul Anam Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri , Indonesia
Imroatul Azizah UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v32i4.3890

Keywords:

Principle of Legality, Living Law, Customary Criminal Law, Legal Pluralism, Criminal Law Reform

Abstract

Introduction: The recognition of living law under Indonesia’s new Criminal Code challenges the conventional understanding of the legality principle, which traditionally requires criminal liability to be based on predetermined written law. The challenge is particularly significant in Indonesia’s plural legal order, where customary norms continue to operate alongside state law.

Purposes of the Research: This study aims to reconstruct the principle of legality by examining the normative position of living law and customary criminal law under Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. It specifically examines how legal certainty, substantive justice, constitutional rights, and cultural legitimacy can be reconciled.

Methods of the Research: This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, philosophical, and comparative approaches. Primary legal materials consist of Law No. 1 of 2023 and its implementing regulations, while secondary materials include scholarly literature on legality, living law, legal pluralism, and customary criminal law. The materials are analyzed qualitatively and prescriptively.

Results of the Research: The study finds that living law does not abolish the legality principle but modifies its operation within a constitutionally bounded plural legal framework. Customary criminal norms may function as a limited source of criminal liability only when their existence, territorial applicability, normative content, and compatibility with constitutional and human-rights standards are established. The study proposes a bounded legality model that combines formal legality, validated living law, judicial scrutiny, and institutional safeguards. Conclusion: The reconstruction therefore requires not unrestricted judicial recognition of customary norms, but a controlled integration of living law that preserves legal certainty while accommodating legitimate customary values.

References

Afnaini. “Integration of Customary Criminal Law into the National Legal System : Opportunities and Challenges.” Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 02 (2025): 607–18. https://doi.org/10.58471/justi.v15i02.

Cesare Beccaria. “Beccaria’s On Crimes and Punishments: A Mirror on the History of the Foundations of Modern Criminal Law.” Oxford University Press, no. n 2 (2014).

Creswell, Jhon. “Qualitative Inqury Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches,” 2017.

Creswell, John W., and J. David Creswell. Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and A Mixed-Method Approach. SAGE Publication, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469237-3.

Dupret, Baudouin. “Legal Pluralism, Plurality of Laws, and Legal Practices.” European Journal of Legal Studies 1, no. 1 (2007): 1–26.

Faisal, Andri Yanto, Derita Prapti Rahayu, Dwi Haryadi, Anri Darmawan, and Jeanne Darc Noviayanti Manik. “Genuine Paradigm of Criminal Justice: Rethinking Penal Reform within Indonesia New Criminal Code.” Cogent Social Sciences 10, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2301634.

Febrianty, Yenny, Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara, Bintara Sura Priam-Bada, and Hikam Hulwanullah. “The Limitations of Living Law in Indonesian Criminal Law Reform: An Effort To Realize Justice.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 11, no. 2 (2023): 196–208. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i2.1232.

Hariri, Achmad, Satria Unggul Wicaksana, and Samsul Arifin. “A Critical Study of Legal Positivism As a Legal System in a Pluralist Country.” KnE Social Sciences, 2022, 563–72.

Hoesein, Zainal Arifin. “The Dynamics of Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia : A Historical and Prospective Review From the Colonial Penal Code to the 2023 National Criminal Code.” Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 03 (2025): 671–78. https://doi.org/10.58471/justi.v15i03.

Johann, Paul, and Anselm Feuerbach. Textbook of the Common Penal Law in Force in Germany. Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199673612.005.0001.

Judijanto, Loso. “Customary Law as a Pillar of Identity and Sustainability: A Review of Its Dynamics, Challenges, and Relevance in the Era of Modernization.” International Journal of Global Sustainable Research 3, no. 11 (2025): 787–804. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijgsr.v3i11.96.

Ledvinka, Tomáš, and James M. Donovan. “Reading Legal Ethnographies to Re-Map Legal Pluralism: A Pospisilian Corrective to the Prevailing Dichotomous Description of Afghanistan’s Legal Order.” Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis 55, no. 3 (2023): 366–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2023.2213519.

Maswatu, Ismail, Tomi Apra Santosa, Abdul Ghoni, Mira Nila, Kusuma Dewi, Taqiyuddin Kadir, Andi Hartawati, and Universitas Jayabaya. “Legal Protection of Indigenous Land Rights : A Study of Customary Law Integration in National Legal” 4, no. 3 (2025): 1789–94.

Masyhar, Ali, Rohadhatul Aisy, Anis Widyawati, M Azil Maskur, and Ali Murtadho. “Reclaiming the Unwritten : Living Law ’ s Prospects under Indonesia ’ s 2023 Penal Reform Faculty of Law , Universitas Negeri Semarang , Indonesia Faculty of Law , Universitas Jenderal Soedirman , Indonesia Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business , Univ.” Jambe Law Journal 8, no. 1 (2025): 255–85. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.8.1.255-285.

McKerracher, Kelty. “Relational Legal Pluralism and Indigenous Legal Orders in Canada.” Global Constitutionalism 12, no. 1 (2023): 133–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381722000193.

Putri, Nella Sumika. “The Material Content of Regional Regulations as the Concretization of the Living Legal System in Society (Adat Law) Based on Article 2 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) 2023.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 7, no. 2 (2023): 15–16.

Rohmah, Siti, and Azka Rasyad Alfatdi. “From Living Law to National Law: Theoretical Reconstruction of Applying Islamic Law in Indonesia.” Peradaban Journal of Law and Society 1, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.59001/pjls.v1i1.19.

Sarifudin Malik, Achmad, and Ratih Yulistiya Rahman. “Synergy of Moral Values in Customary Law with the Philosophy of Natural Law Article History.” Iuridica Pancasila 1, no. 1 (2024).

Simanjuntak, Jansen Edinata, Mompang L. Panggabean, John Pieris, and Wiwik Sri Widiarty. “Customary Law and Multiple Legal Systems in Criminal Justice: Indonesia’s Penal Reform Experience.” Architecture Image Studies 6, no. 3 (December 2025): 1864–80. https://doi.org/10.62754/ais.v6i3.528.

Sueni, Annisa Sabilla, Zico Junius Fernando, Ayu Putriyana, and Dwi Putri Lestarika. “Living Law and Hybrid Justice: The Integration of Customary Criminal Law in Indonesia’s 2023 National Criminal Code.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 13, no. 2 (2025): 1–16.

Wahyudhi, Dheny. “Customary-Based Restorative Justice: Philosophical Foundations and Normative Relevance in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System.” Edunity 4, no. 12 (2025): 819–31.

Y. R. Watofa, Yohanna, Muhammad Amir, Miftakhul Huda, and Pitriani Pitriani. “Integration of Customary Law and State Law in Resolving Natural Resource Conflicts in Indigenous Areas.” Journal of the American Institute 2, no. 8 (2025): 1212–19. https://doi.org/10.71364/178dhm07.