Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Kasus Tindakan Pencurian Kendaraan Bermotor Yang Di Lakukan Oleh Anak
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v4i4.2434Keywords:
Judge's Legal Considerations, Motor Vehicle Theft, ChildAbstract
Introduction: one of the motor vehicle theft cases is the Ambon District Court decision No. No.12/PID.SUS-ANAK/2021/PN.AMB which states that Ammar Peisamal alias Ammar was convicted of "grave theft" as explained in the Criminal Code article 363 paragraph (1).
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine and discuss the actions of the perpetrators who have fulfilled the elements in Article 363 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and examine and discuss the basis for the judge's legal considerations in imposing a prison sentence of 2 years and 6 months on the perpetrator.
Methods of the Research: the research method used is normative legal research. The research approach is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of gathering legal materials through literature studies and then analyzed through perspective using qualitative methods.
Results of the Research: The results showed that the Ambon District Court Judge stated in his decision that the defendant had been legally and convincingly proven to have committed the crime of stealing this case and imposed a prison sentence on the defendant for 2 (two) years and 6 (six) months. The public prosecutor's indictment, the public prosecutor's demands and the judge's considerations in his decision have fulfilled all the elements of the offense and the conditions for imposing a sentence on the defendant. This is based on the examination at trial where the evidence submitted by the public prosecutor includes the statements of the witnesses and the statements of the accused which are interrelated. The testimony of the defendant admitted his actions and regretted it.Downloads
Citation Metrics
References
Adami Chazawi, Kejahatan terhadap Tubuh & Nyawa, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo, 2007.
Andi Hamzah. Delik-Delik Tertentu (Speciale De lie t e n) di dalam KUHP, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2014.
Damang, Definisi Pertimbangan Hukum, dalam http://www.damang.web.id.
Eddy OS. Hiarieej, Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian, Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta, 2012.
Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana di Bidang Lalu Lintas, Jurnal Masohi, Vol. 01, Vol. 01, 2020.
http://www/academia.edu/7532931/Analisis_pidana_anak.
Kumala Enggar Anjarani, Penyelesaian kecelakaan Lalulintas Pelaku Anak, Jurnal Dialektika, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2019.
Lilik Mulyadi, Kompilasi Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Teoristis dan Praktek pradilan. Mandar Maju. 2007.
Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, Komentar atas KUHAP: Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Pradnya Paramitha, Jakarta, 1984.
M H Tirtaamidjaja, Pokok-pokok Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Fasco, 1955.
M. Nasir Djamil. Anak bukan Untuk Di Hukum, Sinar Grafika Jakarta, 2013.
Muladi, Teori- Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Bandung: Alumni, 1998.
Rusli Muhammad, Hukum Acara Pidana Konteporer, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.
Yesmil Anwar dan Adang, Kriminologi. Refika Aditama. Bandung, 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revalno Alfons, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu, Iqbal Taufik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms: TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
